18:3318:33, 31 May 2024diffhist+35
Ethnic cleansing
These were swapped but this eems more notorious and fitting for the lead of the two in regarding to the Yugoslav Wars and coining of the phrase.
27 May 2024
16:1716:17, 27 May 2024diffhist+1,298
Dalmatia
Undid revision 1225720213 by Botushali (talk) Isn’t the onus on the one changing the stable form? Hence removing long-standing information should require talking it out on the talk page. It seems recently removed rather than added.Tag: Undo
17:2017:20, 26 May 2024diffhist−181
Ethnic cleansing
→Etymology: Undue given why would it be significant who was the first individual in every nationality to use the term, also for next sentence is not what the sources said. It said both factions used the word. Not the order.
22:4622:46, 24 May 2024diffhist−10
Dubrovnik
Seems undue since both historically used and where the city is in modern day. Did the edit have consensus when added? Returned to typical format like other city articlescurrent
04:2804:28, 21 May 2024diffhist−166
Split, Croatia
This was added with an edit summary “fix”. Spalato became the official name in the 18th century so it seems undue and misleading to imply it was the definitive historical name. There were multiple forms. Hence the original “others names” section redirect makes more sense. Unless there was mass consensus on this which I didn’t see?
04:1504:15, 21 May 2024diffhist−284
Zadar
Was there consensus for this addition? Seems numerous edit wars had followed. There wasn’t only one historical name so this is undue and pov. Mentions of Zadar in the 12th century had predated Zara of the 15th century per Etymology section. And there were other names before. Why would Zara be defacto the historical term? This implies some nation’s having more important than others. The original direction to the naming section is neutral. Has been for many years. Unless I am missing something?