This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The spelling 'Cornet' appears in several articles on the Internet and should probably appear in both the article and 'Cornet' disabiguation. Also, is 'Kornet' the Russian/Slavic spelling for 'Cornet'? 89.0.216.89 11:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC) Roy
Here is an article saying Hizbollah were using it. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/08/15/wmid15.xml
So, if telegraph says it has been used, we should accept newspaper's writings as true? Where is russians admitting it was used? Where is Israelis showing ANYONE those Kornets found? NOWHERE, so, please, do not rush to add Hizbollah to Kornet users, it was never proven to anyone. And regarding the supposed "evidence" on this page, that russians supposedly tightened control over foreign countrys users of equipment, it very well might be all about RPG-29, and not Kornet, we can not make a conclusive claim that it was about Kornet here, hence we can not claim that Kornet was used by Hezbollah. Also, new control law might be a preemptive measure. It has been rumored Kornet has ben used, not proven. So, unless wikipedia wants to be a place where rumors are being displayed as truth without evidence, then sure, let's add back that Hezbollah has been using Kornet.
What's with that Hezbollah paragraph? It's like some kid wrote that. There's double negations, a lot of maybe, probably, perhaps, etc... It should just be one sentence. It is unclear wether or not it was used. All the mambo-jambo about tanks disabled but not destroyed and the israelis going to moscow is superfluos chatter.190.50.213.208 (talk) 09:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The page has been vandalized on a daily basis by different IP addresses. I've added a request for semi-protection. --Super.zhid 13:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Kornet has NOT been proven to be in Hezbollah and Israel conflict, why does the page say it was? It was NEVER proven by Israel. RPG-29 Vampire, yes, but Kornet, never.
wooden Boxes aren't solid proof. Israel need to capture real life Kornet or a color video of Hebollah fighter carrying it. Yes, the writing say's it's Russians, the Tare marking seem's legit, But for country like Israel who developed some of the most advance weapons in the world, a simple stenciled wooden box aren't really beyond their technical capability. I admit, maybe, i say MAYBE, Hezbollah did used Kornet, but Wooden boxes aren't going to prove anything, unless if you put a gun on everyones head and force them to believe it. 60.48.73.162 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC).
I would like to point out that Hassan Nasrallah, secretary general of Hezbollah, implicitly admitted having Kornet missiles in one of his speeches. The video of the speech I'm referring to can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hRwn3kJ_xE Nasrallah makes the implicit admission at around minute 26 of the video. He is saying roughly that if he is going to accept the decision that the government of Lebanon took of dismantling the Hezbollah telecom network, this step would be soon followed by others that would target its military capabilities, anti-tank weapons, and the Kornet. The word Kornet can be recognized even by those who don't speak Arabic (26:02-26:04) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.126.24.52 (talk) 23:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user User:211.187.89.102 has removed Hezbollah from Operators section twice ([1], [2]) in the last day. Unless this edit is explained, I'm going to revert is as vandalism. Also notifying the user on his talk page. --Super.zhid (talk) 09:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
The addition of HAMAS to the list of those in possession of the rocket is unjustified as it is unproven. Even the article linked to justify it states that it was believed to have been used by "Army of Islam" and not HAMAS. As a result, the mention of HAMAS should be removed. For this reason, I have removed mention of HAMAS in the list pending submission of some evidence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.22.223.193 (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I am wondering whether the shooting at a school bus really belongs under 'Combat history'. Maybe we should create a new section, like 'Terrorist attacks' or something? Any thoughts here? Bazuz (talk) 20:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article, File:Hizbollah3.tif, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:37, 18 November 2011 (UTC) |
An image used in this article, File:Hezbollah flag.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
its pointless every weapon is cable of killing civilians its unhonest and has nothing to with combat history, should for every Israeli drone and phosphor bomb added a section how they killed Palestinian children???--Alibaba445 (talk) 07:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
I removed the picture because it is not relevant to the article. Weapon articles on wikipedia don't normally show pictures of wounded people. For example the AGM-114 Hellfire article doesn't show pictures of dead Palestinian children.
Also I removed the text "In attacks against civilians" because whether civilians were deliberately targeted in the attack is disputed.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/09/palestinians-israel-hamas-idUSLDE73807X20110409 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ojoc (talk • contribs) 21:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
As I said, Korent is a thrid generation anti-tank system. Please correct this innacurate statement.
As I said, Korent is a thrid generation anti-tank system. Please correct this innacurate statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.213.94.73 (talk) 08:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
As there are not accepted standard or general consensus of anti-tank system generations what-so-ever, any reference to generations are inaccurate by default and thus should be removed. /BP 81.225.216.15 (talk) 20:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
The price per unit repeatedly added by 84.52.101.196, $2,200, is totally unrealistic and should be reverted to what it previously said, $875,000 per system (with one launcher and ten missiles per system). Having a reference (SIPRI) that says that Eritrea bought 80 Kornets for $170,000 in 2005 does not outweigh the fact that common sense says it's not a realistic price (and WP:RS expressly says that common sense is indispensable when evaluating sources...), and must be part of a military aid deal or something. Thomas.W (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklistIf you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:32, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
http://i.imgur.com/a7QAc9r.jpg http://i.imgur.com/YZ89YJU.jpg http://i.imgur.com/glr9lO8.jpg http://i.imgur.com/Yf4cmGL.jpg frontal arc was penetrated and the tank was destroyed entirely. Burned wrack http://i.imgur.com/CfAP71Q.jpg afterwards (notice the hit was in the frontal arc the tank burned entirely) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.242.72.131 (talk) 12:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 9M133 Kornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 9M133 Kornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Foreign language SaintAviator lets talk 03:07, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 9M133 Kornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://kbptula.ru/old_site/eng/atgw/kornet.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on 9M133 Kornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://english2.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=9103085396When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 9M133 Kornet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)