This article was nominated for deletion on 20 March 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Children's literature Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tasks you can do: edit history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add ((Portal|Children's literature)) to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with ((WikiProject Children's literature)) Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article edit

The synopsis for the book A Week in the Woods by Andrew Clements is incorrect. Most of it is correct, but the ending is different. In the actual book, Mark participates in a week in the woods as part of the fifth grade curriculum. There is miscommunication between him and Mr. Maxwell, and Mark goes out into the woods by himself. He wants to prove he can do it. Mr. Maxwell realizes his mistake and follows Mark into the woods. Mr. Maxwell gets hurt, and Mark finds him. They talk things through, and the book ends with the end of the project. Everyone goes home with more understanding of each other. Mr. Maxwell does not realize he is Mark's father, because he isn't. He doesn't adopt Mark.

I am a third and fourth grade teacher, and I read every book that goes on my bookshelf. Andrew Clements is a terrific author who writes books about kids doing amazing things.

Christi321 (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Christi321[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A Week in the Woods. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206190038/http://www.iasl-ia.org:80/icca.php to http://www.iasl-ia.org/icca.php
• Added ((dead link)) tag to http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=22&pid=409951

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]