GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:After the Rain (TV special)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Averageuntitleduser (talk · contribs) 01:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I'll be giving this a look through! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Well-written

[edit]

How heartwarming! I enjoyed the hook with Typhoon Ketsana and the structure of the rest of the article. Forgive my pickiness, though, as it is a short one.

Done on the first bolded (official) title
Linked
Makes sense, tweaked as suggested.
Thanks for catching that. Fixed now to was spliced
Done.
Done
You're right, fixed now
Revised it for more clarity.
Correct, each of those (three) numbers/songs were with guest acts.
Got it. I tweaked it a little for clarity.
Also correct.

Verifiable with no original research

[edit]

No issues with source formatting. Earwig shows a low score of 30%, due to the attributed quote box. No original research, as all content is cited where needed. However:

I've added that along with the dinner party.

Spot-check

[edit]
Metro Manila is part of Luzon, as well as Calabarzon, Central Luzon. A big chunk of those 23 provinces are in Luzon. It also mentions further in the news article re the regions affected by rainfall, which are part of Luzon (except VII which is in the Visayas) : Regions I, II, III, IV-A, IV-B V, VII, CAR, and NCR.
Ah, that makes sense.

Broad in its coverage

[edit]

I really tried to look for more sources and I've ended up empty-handed. I think this article is as comprehensive as possible. However:

Added this bit alongside the aid packages.

Neutral

[edit]

No issues on this front.

Stable

[edit]

No recent edit wars or content disputes.

Illustrated

[edit]

The title card is relevant and has a suitable fair use rationale.

Summary

[edit]

I love the work you're doing with Filipino artists, and this article is close to becoming another green piece of the puzzle! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 14:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As always, feel free to disagree with my comments or use something better than what I've suggested! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 15:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Averageuntitleduser: Thanks for taking on this review and appreciate the kind words. I've actioned all comments and suggestions. Let me know if there's anythng I might have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The changes look nice, great work! Averageuntitleduser (talk) 18:40, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.