Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
I'm not sure i got it but how a village, existing from Crusader era becomes only defined as "Palestinian". Was it never Crusader, Mamluk, Ottoman and currently an Israeli national park? I'm not saying we should merge it with the Israeli Qastel national park article, but this article should not be only about Palestinian Arab village, cose it sounds like WP:SYNTH.Greyshark09 (talk) 19:56, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
This, from the travel section of the Jerusalem Post, is written by the owner of a tour guide company. I welcome somebody to explain why it is a reliable source. If what he writes is true, there should be no trouble finding an actually qualified source for it. nableezy - 18:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)