GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appears fairly long but well-written. Sorry it had to wait so long. I will post my comments soon :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:27, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sainsf, I look forward to your assessment. Cinadon36 19:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
General comments
  • A few parts in Political stance however lack inline citations.
  • Are all the works in 'Works' mentioned with proper sources earlier? For those that are not it would be good to add inline citations
** Doing...Cinadon36 10:55, 21 April 2020 (UTC) Done. I removed a subsection of works published after his death. It seems that these titles didnot receive much attention by other authors.Cinadon36 09:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments on prose

Well-written and grammatically accurate on the whole. A few queries and suggestions:

It 's already there, at main body ("At age 44, he was the second-youngest recipient of the prize, after Rudyard Kipling, who was 42")Cinadon36 17:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I meant in the lead. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:59, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I feel it is a bit trivial info to have a place in the lede. Cinadon36 18:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The rest looks good to me. Thanks for this interesting read :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 16:55, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, everything looks great :) Promoted! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 22:04, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks Sainsf for taking this GAN. I 'd also like to thank you for your comments and points- the article looks much better now. Cinadon36 08:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]