This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Withdrawn, 7 September 2008, see discussion. Delete, 21 November 2006, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles New Zealand: Politics / Māori Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

• I believe that this page should be re-created. Greensill is running again and came very close to beating the incumbent last election and considering the polls are so close this time around and that the Maori Party may hold the balance of power in the next government it is important that this person be detailed. In addition she has been leader of several important Maori political movements and though may be consider un"notable" to Pakeha is considered very notable in Maori communities. WahineToa (UTC) (sorry about my format, just working this all out, kia ora!) WahineToa (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd like to include a photo but don't have one of the authorisation (4 day old account)requirements. There is a photo here http://www.tangatawhenua.com/44ang.jpg that is free to use (i.e. doesn't violate copyright) - if you are able could you include it with the caption: Angeline Greensill - 2008 WahineToa (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh and how long before those boxes will be removed (i.e. is the page adequately cleaned up and referenced? Many thanks! WahineToa (talk) 01:04, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the community is satsified that the issues raised int he boxes have been addressed. The ((cleanup)) box can be removed because at this point as the article now has a defined structure and links to other articles here. As for the references box, that can be removed when more external links and sources are added to the article. The people at the biography wikiproject may be able to help with the article if you ask them nicely. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:38, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I have had a look over the page and it is well started. For the following reasons I would support the page and oppose any attempt at removing it. The page will take a few months to develop full volume RoddyYoung (talk) 03:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The page is important to the new zealand election

• • The page is newly created to capture the next three months up to the election

• • The page is of public interest and has a place in an encyclopedia

• • On fairness grounds all candidates in a public election have the right to have a public profile in wikipedia if abiding by the rules

I have nominated this article for deletion on the grounds specified in WP:POLITICIAN. The sources given in this article are not "independent of the subject" given that they are from primary sources. I will be happy to withdraw the nomination if evidence of Ms Greensill's notability in other areas is adduced. However, as it stands I believe that the information in this article belongs on the Māori Party website and not in Wikipedia. If Ms Greensill is successful in the upcoming elections, then I will support the restoration of this article.

Additionally I am dubious about using the category "Māori Party MPs" give that Ms Greensill is not an MP.

In response to RoddyYoung above, please provide evidence that "all candidates in a public election have the right to have a public profile in wikipedia". Wikipedia is not intended to be an electioneering platform nor is it a news source - this last can be found in Wikinews. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 04:51, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Beeswaxcandle I agree that category is misleading, I have removed it. Atutahi (talk) 05:50, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora all - Beeswaxcandle (and others) just wanted to get your feedback on the piece now, we have now included only independent sources from Newspapers and TV and have included her notability in other areas (i.e. pivotal in getting tribal land returned to her people). It is important also to remember that in Maori communities her notability is unquestioned. This is continually an issue which we (Maori) fight for, to have our people, our knowledge and our perspectives included in public discourse, by negating her efforts on these grounds Te Ao Maori continues to be undermined. I would just hate to see that continued here in Wikipedia, and no doubt if more Maori were editing these Wikis this would not be an issue but the fact is that few do, something at least our whanau are trying to help with.

• With this in mind I believe that Ms Greensill meets the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."
• BTW, I do appreciate this process, peer-reviewed articles are definitely valuable. Many thanks for your korero. Atutahi (talk) 08:28, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Move the second paragraph under the Personal section to the Political section.
• The first paragraph under the Personal section doesn't belong in Wikipedia - however, some of this information can be used in other sections. Then remove the Personal section. Also, make the reference to Eva Rickard in the Land Rights section a WikiLink.
• Name usage: Sometimes it is "Greensill" and sometimes "Ms Greensill".
• The link on turangawaewae is to the Turangawaewae Marae - is this what is meant? If so, then it should be capitalised. If however, it is the "place to stand" of another Marae that is meant, then I suggest the link is made to a definition in Wiktionary (it probably needs creating there).
• The claim of expertise in Genetic Engineering needs to be backed up with a considerable body of published data. If it can't be, then the claim needs to be removed.
• The general convention on English Wikipedia for words in Māori is to use macrons over the long vowels - particularly in the word Māori.

Beeswaxcandle (talk) 06:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]