This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Excerpt from Dupuy, Trevor N.; Dupuy, R. Ernest (1993). The Harper Encyclopedia of Military History. Harper Collins Publishers, page 366:
1221. Battle of Pirvan. While Genghis was gathering his sons' contingents for another campaign together, Jellaluddin with 120,000 men defeated an advance Mongol force of 3 toumans (30,000 men) in the Hindi Kush Mountains northwest of Ghazni. Genghis moved swiftly to avenge the defeat, and the Turkish prince, deserted by his Afghan allies, withdrew into the Northern Pubjab with about 30,000 men. Genghis followed with more than 50,000.
Another source cited at the Battle of Indus artice similarly gives Jalal's forces as 120,000 for this battle. Page 273. Here is what it says:
At the head of an army of about 120,000 men, Jellaluddin, son of Mohammad Shah, meets and defeats 30,000 of Genghis Khan’s Mongols in the Hindu Kush in the Battle of Pirvan. Jellaluddin, now deserted by his Afghan allies, withdraws with about 30,000 men into the northern Punjab, pursued by Genghis Khan and a force of 50,000 Mongols.
What do you mean? You mean "the lowest estimate" sides should be updated? That is the only thing I see that might be considered confusion. While your point is kinda true, Carl Sverdrup evaluates what the true numbers might have been and states the reported numbers are hugely exagerated whereas others just choose which of the reported ones might be closest to be true, without taking into account the possibility of exageration --81.213.215.83 (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And what do you think about merging the section Aftermath and Legacy? I think the two should be merged and named "Aftermath and Legacy" because the insurgency that emerged after this battle serves both sections as well as all the things in the legacy section. Also, does the article qualify to be good or A-class? --81.213.215.83 (talk) 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An IP-editor requested a reassessment in the MILHIST assessment page. The following are still unreferenced, thus b1=no and still a C-class:
Infobox
Cavalry numbers
The mongol losses should be mentioned in the article body with a reference
Background
All of first paragraph
Note [a]
Last sentence of 2nd paragraph
Note [b] (you mention a name, but please also add an inline-ref)
Army strengths
Last sentence
Battle
All of first paragraph
Note [e]
What does "On the second day of the battle, to deceive the Khwarezmians, Shikhikhutag mounted straw warriors on spare remounts, which may have spared him from a killing stroke, but Jalal al-Din was not fooled by the ruse." mean? If the ruse didn't fool Jalal al-Din, then how did it spare Shikhikhutag?
The battle section seems rather short. Is there more you could write about this?
Finally, this could use a bit of proofreading, e.g. cavalries → cavalry, news spreaded → news spread, etc.