Bayshore Route has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 19, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Bayshore Route appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:13, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Mccunicano (talk). Self-nominated at 18:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC).
In the map in this article's infobox, I only see a short section of the Bayshore Route highlighted in red (immediately north of the Tokyo Port Tunnel), rather than the entire 62-km length described in the article body. I see in the article's GA review that Downsize43 noticed that the route wasn't highlighted in mobile view - I'm using desktop view on Windows, and see the incomplete highlighting on Firefox and Chrome. I did notice that the ((Highway system OSM map)) template is using d:Q1369525, the Shuto Expressway, as its highway_system_qid rather than d:Q4874809, but using the latter in the template seems (from the edit preview) to show a map centered at 0°N, 0°E, so I assume Q4874809 is missing route data. I don't know enough about this to determine whether the cause and solution of this problem are in the article, the template, the Wikidata entry, or OpenStreetMap - if someone who knows more about creating route maps could take a look, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I wonder if we should go back to using c:File:Shutoko_expwy_wangan_route.png for the time being. --Opus 113 (talk) 19:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)