Bukit Kutu has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 28, 2020 Good article nominee Not listed March 30, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with ((WikiProject Geography)). To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs Malaysia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Southeast Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ghost towns Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on November 25, 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bukit Kutu/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This looks interesting. I'll review it. Guettarda (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

• After the first "kilometres" you can abbreviate them to "km". I recommend adding the parameter |abbr=on in the ((convert)). If you don't, you should use |adj=on in places like the second sentence get 15.3-kilometre (9.5 mi) bridle path instead of the grammatically incorrect 15.3 kilometres (9.5 mi) bridle path

 Done WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Third sentence: and the British government acquired the station's bungalows. Was it actually the British government, or perhaps the government of the Federated Malay States? If you aren't sure (the source just says "the government", unless I missed something more specific), I think "the government of British Malaya would probably work. But I'm pretty sure the government of the United Kingdom (which is where that link leads) did not acquire the hill station.

I am not entirely sure which "government" in the reference refers to, In sentence, at the moment replaced with "government of British Malaya". WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

History

• You say Because of safety precautions... and Despite the trail's dangers..., but you don't say what the safety precautions or the dangers are. The first one could be As a safety precaution... but if you start with "because of" or "despite" the implication is that you are referencing something that came before.

 Done rewritten as due to risks of lost inside the trail. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• In July 2017, another hiker from Egypt... - unless there was a previous hiker from Egypt, you should just say something like "a hike from Egypt", or "another hiker, this one from Egypt". And if there was a previous hiker from Egypt, you should mention them before the "another".

 Done There is only one hiker from Egypt with this incident. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Biodiversity

• For instance, seven variants of mosquitoes - do you mean variants, or do you mean species or subspecies? "Variant" usually implies something less than a subspecies.

 Done replaced to "subspecies". WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Guettarda (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

@Guettarda: I had done improve the article based on your suggestion. Can have a check on the article before finalize for the GA. WPSamson (talk) 04:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! Nice work. Guettarda (talk) 12:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]