GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Businessman (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Caponer (talk · contribs) 18:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pavanjandhyala, I will complete a thorough and comprehensive review of this article within the next 48 hours. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns in the meantime. Thanks! -- Caponer (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Pavanjandhyala, I've completed a thorough and comprehensive review and re-review of your article, and I assess that it meets all the criteria for passage to Good Article status. Prior to its passage, however, I have shared below some comments and questions that should be addressed. Thanks again for all your hard work on this article. -- Caponer (talk) 18:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pavanjandhyala, thank you for your responding to and implementing my below comments and suggestions in such a timely manner. I hereby pass this article to Good Article status. Thank you! -- Caponer (talk) 21:07, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lede

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

As per WP:FILMPLOT, "Since films are primary sources in their articles, basic descriptions of their plots are acceptable without reference to an outside source". Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

 Done Added. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:04, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Production

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Music

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, except for the fact that two lakh discs were sold on the first day, nothing else was known. The soundtrack was more famous for its plagiarism allegations. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Release

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done They complained to Hyderabad city ploice, thus i assume it as Municipal police. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remakes

Possible sequel

Categories