This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. California: Southern California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Southern California task force.

Was it an upgrade to DIII ? Is the 2nd D for Divertor ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the given coordinates are incorrect. I think the fusion reactor is here: 32.902251, -117.228856. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 03:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DIII-D is not a fusion reactor.
It is a tokamak used to investigate how to best build a fusion reactor. The page should be moved to DIII-D (tokamak). — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmiliaWiki (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Y Done. I agree with this and I've performed the move. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you EmiliaWiki (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed in this section that DIII-D (tokamak) be renamed and moved to DIII-D. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use ((subst:requested move)). Do not use ((requested move/dated)) directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

DIII-D (tokamak) → DIII-D – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. GZWDer (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose Google and views[[1]] doesn't suggest this is the primary topic so the base name should be retargeted to DIII. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]