This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

We have tried to modify the content of the article. It is not possible because when modifying it, the original appears again. We think it is necessary to update the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saragommezz (talk • contribs)

Your changes are being reverted because you are removing the existing, properly sourced content and replacing it with new stuff that is not reliably sourced. - MrOllie (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are using official sources of updated information. We only want to update the existing information because the current one is outdated Saragommezz (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're using a collection of industry white papers and primary government sources, which are both of lower quality than the peer-reviewed, secondary sources in the current version of the article. - MrOllie (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current references are very outdated and date from 2005 to 2013, we believe that its update is necessary Saragommezz (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you rewrite it based on whatever newer, peer-reviewed articles are available. But marketing materials like industry whitepapers are really not useful sources. MrOllie (talk) 15:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to write something based on reliable, secondary sources. Waiting a month and making the same edit again will not help. MrOllie (talk) 12:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Common european dataspaces and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 11#Common european dataspaces until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The EU is currently investing heavily into Data Spaces, seeing them as a key enabler for industry digitalization.

• The following associations are involved: BDVA, IDSA (started this line of work in 2014), GAIA-X, ADRA, DSBA
• There's a lot of serious work being done, both technical (https://internationaldataspaces.org/publications/ids-ram/), legal and business work.
• About 10 data spaces are in the works; eg I know of 4 Horizon Europe projects (~10MEUR each) working on EU Energy data space

@Saragommezz, MrOllie, Rosguill, NikkiDataSpace, Duncan.Hull, Triadic2000, Tourorist, Beetstra, Aramallo, Biogeographist, Kku, and Padgriffin:

Do you think this article talks about the same topic and can be expanded? Or should we start a new article?

• AFAIK, EU data spaces are not yet covered in Wikipedia and Wikidata, not even the above associations
• There's just https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q110739430 with a DE page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobility_Data_Space; listed as a subclass of https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q370685 (which points to this article)

PS: is there a relevant project I can ping?

• Can't find any relevant active project at https://bambots.brucemyers.com/drb/WikiProjectList.html
• The following are supposed to exist (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Directory/Science#Information_science) but return error:
  • Error: the group "Databases" was not found.
  • Error: the group "Computer science" was not found.

Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please list the independent secondary sources that comply with Wikipedia's sourcing guidelines that have become available? We really need to avoid industry whitepapers, government documents, and other primary sources, either on this or on some new article topic. MrOllie (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested changes were not specific enough.

I'd like to suggest the following improvements to the article on Dataspaces on behalf of the International Data Spaces Association.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete entire Applications of dataspaces section
• Reason for the change: It a direct WP:COPYVIO of Franklin 2005, Section 2. Examples
• References supporting change: http://sigmod.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0512/p27-article-franklin.pdf

• Specific text to be added or removed: Remove the paragraph with the ZDNet reference
• Reason for the change: The paragraph and reference were added to promote a product launch. The reference is WP:LINKSPAM - a product launch press release. Neither data spaces nor data graphs are discussed in the source.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Remove the external links section
• Reason for the change: The only external link no-longer leads to relevent content.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Add short description "Abstraction in data management"
• Reason for the change: WP:SHORTDES, "Each Wikipedia article should include a concise explanation of its scope in the form of a short description".

• Specific text to be added or removed: Reposition existing references.
  • Belhajjame 2010 & 2013 - Move both to end of paragraph 1, sentence 2.
  • Talukdar 2010 - delete, the paper explicitly states that it is not talking about dataspaces.
  • Sarma 2009 and Franklin 2005 - Move to the end of paragraph 3
  • Howe 2008 - Move to the end of paragraph 2
  • Dong 2008 - Delete, mentions DSSP once, duplicating Sarma 2009, so not needed
  • Dong 2007 - Leave as is

• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. Many of the sources have the same authors (e.g. Dong, X. and Belhajjame, K.) and contain very similar wording. Some can be more appropriately used to reference other sections.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Add Linked data to the see also section.
• Reason for the change: It's a key principle in dataspaces.

MisterTech (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC) MisterTech (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 18-OCT-2023

  Specification requested  

• It is not known what changes are requested to be made. Your request states "Please move third paragraph" or "reposition references". This is not clear enough of a direction. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change x to y using z".

Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed.
Regards,  Spintendo  22:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

I've revised the requested changes to make them clearer.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete entire Applications of dataspaces section
• Reason for the change: It a direct WP:COPYVIO of Franklin 2005, Section 2. Examples
• References supporting change: http://sigmod.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0512/p27-article-franklin.pdf

• Specific text to be added or removed: Remove the paragraph with the ZDNet reference - "Data graphs play an important role in dataspaces systems. They work on a fact based (triples or "data entities" made up of subject-predicate-object)^[1] data modeling approach which supports the "pay-as-you-go" techniques described above. They support data co-existence and are therefore an ideal technique for semantic integration. Search and relational-style queries and analytics can work simultaneously on data graphs which is another important property of dataspaces."
• Reason for the change: The paragraph and reference were added to promote a product launch. The reference is WP:LINKSPAM - a product launch press release. Neither data spaces nor data graphs are discussed in the source.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete the External links section
• Reason for the change: The only external link no-longer leads to relevent content.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Add short description "Abstraction in data management"
• Reason for the change: WP:SHORTDES, "Each Wikipedia article should include a concise explanation of its scope in the form of a short description".

• Specific text to be added or removed: Move references ^[2] and ^[3] to end of paragraph 1, sentence 2 (ending " ... "pay-as-you-go" fashion as it is used.")
• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. These references only refer to the first two sentences.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete reference ^[4]
• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. This paper explicitly states that it is not talking about dataspaces.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Move references ^[5] and ^[6] to the end of paragraph 3 (ending " ... (e.g., for commit protocols).")
• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. These references can be more appropriately used to reference another section.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Move reference ^[7] to the end of paragraph 2 (ending " ... to set up a data integration system.")
• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. This reference can be more appropriately used to reference another section.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete reference ^[8]
• Reason for the change: There is no need for eight references (WP:OVERCITE) for the first three sentences. This reference mentions DSSP once, duplicating ^[5], so it is not needed

• Specific text to be added or removed: Add Linked data to the see also section.
• Reason for the change: It's a key principle in dataspaces.

MisterTech (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done All done except #1. A page number was not provided with the reference (a reference which is 7 pages long). That actual page where the alleged copied-and-pasted text resides needs to be provided with the request. Surely the COI editor does not expect the reviewer to read 7 pages of text in order to verify the copyvio. Regards,  Spintendo  00:45, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll open another edit request for the remaining couple of issues. MisterTech (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

I've further revised the remaining edit requests to make them clearer.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Delete entire Applications of dataspaces section
• Reason for the change: It a direct WP:COPYVIO of the originating paper.
• References supporting change: http://sigmod.org/publications/sigmodRecord/0512/p27-article-franklin.pdf Page 28, or page 2 of the document, Section 2. Examples

• Specific text to be added or removed: Remove the paragraph with the ZDNet reference - "Data graphs play an important role in dataspaces systems. They work on a fact based (triples or "data entities" made up of subject-predicate-object)^[1] data modeling approach which supports the "pay-as-you-go" techniques described above. They support data co-existence and are therefore an ideal technique for semantic integration. Search and relational-style queries and analytics can work simultaneously on data graphs which is another important property of dataspaces."
• Reason for the change: The paragraph and reference were added to promote a product launch. The reference is WP:REFSPAM - a product launch press release. Dataspaces are not discussed in it.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MisterTech (talk • contribs) 09:21, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 20-OCT-2023

  Copyvio text deleted  

• The COI editor is gently reminded of the need to sign all talk page posts left by them.

Regards,  Spintendo  17:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://doi.org/10.1145/1107499.1107502%20. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Brendan ❯❯❯ Talk 17:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]