This article was nominated for deletion on 4 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
An image used in this article, File:ErinWeirPortrait.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ErinWeirPortrait.JPG) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC) |
This photograph was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license and is no longer scheduled for deletion
I have been the primary editor of this page to date. I am associated with Erin Weir and thus may be perceived as having a conflict of interest. I recognize that Wikipedia values NPOV and I will do my best to edit this article with that principle.
I would note that I neither created the page, nor participated in the discussion to delete. I have also never removed information placed on the page by any other editor. SKL688 (talk)
I think the facts are okay, but some parts read a bit like an advertisement. Could they be toned down a little bit?
Language like "His commitment and dedication to his studies..." sound promotional in nature.
"many honours" -- how many is many?
"Erin is an accomplished writer and essayist" - how is that determination made? Why "accomplished"? Isn't "essayist" sufficient?
Also, what "reference books"? They could either be esteemed or marginal reference books. I'm not sure.
Again, I think the article is generally fine, but some of the language could be pulled back a bit, perhaps. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.165.36.130 (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Erin Weir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Why is the CCF listed as his political party when they haven't existed for 60 years? This is misleading. I know he chose that affiliation in the House, but MPs can chose any affiliation. If a MP choses to affiliate with a non-existing organization, that doesn't mean said non-existing organization becomes existing. It's fine to note his choice to affiliate with the CCF in the body of the article, but including it in the infobox, where people will be seeking info about membership in actual, real political parties. The inclusion of the "CCF" there is misleading and the edit reversion by Saxones288 should be undone. 108.26.146.175 (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2022 (UTC)