This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Simmons uses the lowercase "marine" when referring to Colonial Marines. I have decided to retain this convention unless there are objections. --Mmx1 00:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
This is a very good article. Is there an interest in putting it up for GA or even working to FA? — ERcheck (talk) 03:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I made some edit on the Marine Corps History article but now my changes are gone. At the Battle of Bladensburg, the oldest US Marine Corps post, The Marine Corps Barrack was spare for their bravery. There was nothing in the article post about that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Okita Soshi (talk • contribs) 17:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
The GWOT section mentions Afghanistan (OEF) and Iraq (OIF), but does not mention other areas that the Marine Corps works in support of GWOT (Reserve support of border patrol, Horn of Africa, etc.) I think this is an area that should be expanded to include the full scope of USMC GWOT activities. — ERcheck (talk) 00:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
"and decorated both the 5th and 6th Regiments with the Croix de Guerre. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, then Secretary of the Navy, stated that enlisted Marines would henceforth wear the French Fourragere on the left shoulder of their dress uniforms."
I'd like to point out that only Marines from the 5th and 6th Regiments wear the French Fourragere. The wording leaves it open to the interpretation that all enlisted Marines wear it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shpeve (talk • contribs) 04:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC).
Obviously the Marine Corps were KEY in the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign. They WERE the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign. Its a very responsible use of space, content and imagery of the raising of the flag. I noticed that the article named only the photographer Joe Rosenthal at the raising of the flag, but not any of the names of the Marines in attendance. It is generally believed that their was a lot of anonymity regarding these soldiers. I do know of atleast one Marine that has been identified and honored in Texas for his participation on Mt. Suribachi. This Marine's name is Harlon H. Block. It would be note-worthy in my opinion to include the Marines and Corpsman that were actually raising the flag. Want some feed back please.
Jerry Zambrano
Jerry.zambrano 08:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
I want to discuss the various traditions and symbols of teh Corps (EGA, the hymn, the Rifleman's creed, etc), but I'm undecided over whether it should be a section on this page or a new article. Thoughts? bahamut0013♠♣ 00:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
A note to Bahamut, please don't delete sourced information while making claims about the sources that are patently not true. The source i used clearly mentions the ear collection specialty. As to it being far fetched. May I humbly ask you to read
Or why not have a peek at Life Magazine "Picture Of the Week" from May 22, 1944.
Cheers --Stor stark7 Speak 09:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
From the source:
And this is the sentence that seems to be disliked by so many : A Marine-corp specialty was the collection of Japanese ears, while the army troops preferred to collect and display skulls.[1]
By User:Looper5920 deleted with the reasoning: "it is poorly written, out of context, given way to much emphasis and should not be added to this broad a topic....bottomline it is out of place."
The "broad topic" in question being History_of_the_United_States_Marine_Corps#World_War_II
I can only conclude that the purpose of this article is to be a commercial and a recruitment poster for the U.S. Marine corps, and should be labeled as such to warn any potential readers of this bias and other flaws. Cheers.--Stor stark7 Speak 11:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
This article has way more inline citations that I would expect in a B-class article, so I've promoted it. Its probably ready for a GA review if any of the authors want to give it a try. Kirk (talk) 14:56, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
In the article I found what seem to be discrepancies and a major omission. Any number of sources state unequivocally that The Continental Marines were founded on November 10, 1775. And that Captain Nicholas' second in command 1st Lt Isaac Craig recruited 63 Marines at Tun's Tavern in Philadelphia. While the original building is long gone the Historical Society of Pennsylvania has provided ample evidence of its existence near Dock St. It is to be expected that each of the four original officers probably went to four separate taverns to recruit Marines along the waterfront. Every year there is a major Marine celebration at a tavern on Oregon Avenue in South Philly where Marines have congregated for many years on November 10th. The Marines then joined Commodore Esek Hopkins squadron and made a successful amphibious landing on New Providence Island. They also gave a good account during the "Glasgow" incident which was blown out of all proper propriety for political reasons. Having spent a great deal of time on the water in fog you can become quickly disoriented. That notwithstanding, you could not pick out your own brother at 50 feet, let alone definitively identify a ship at 100 yards.
General Cadwalader ordered the Marines under his command to find out if it was safe to make a night crossing over the Delaware. A group of Marines shoved off slightly north of Pennsbury Manor and landed in New Jersey just south of the Assunpink Creek. Upon finding the area quiet Captain Craig ordered one of the boats back to Pennsylvania so that he could report to Cadwalader that it was safe to cross. Cadwalader refused to cross claiming all sorts of ridiculous objections. (Hence the Philly area terminology of a coward being a Cad.) The Marine officer thereupon recrossed the river and extracted his men according to the Cad's orders. Upon arrival back in Pennsylvania General Cadwalader decided to send the Marines back across the river and secure a beachhead for him for his movement at dawn by which time an infuriated General Of The Armies George Washington had already taken Trenton. The Cad's only accomplishment was to roust a small contingent of enemy troops at Assunpink Creek later in the morning. General Washington abruptly sent the Cad back to Philadelphia while he took the Marines and some Pennsy troops to Princeton. The Marines having never faced a bayonet charge by British Regulars panicked. The brilliant, and gallant General Hugh Mercer rode in among them and rallied the Marines at the cost of his life. Captain Craig thereupon was unwillingly conscripted into the Army serving until the end of the war in 1783.
My name is Walter S. Gee III and I am Isaac Craig's lineal descendant by right of primogeniture. I am first and foremost a researcher and second a writer. You can reach me at s<redacted> or at <redacted> My phone is <redacted> and I live in Copperhill, TN 37317-0423. Should you wish to check out the above your first stop should be The Historical Society of Pennsylvania on Locust St in Philly. Your next stop should be the Carnegie Mellon Library in Pittsburgh, PA. I also located a great deal of information at the Philadelphia Free Public Library. I would also refer you to the National Archives where I also found a great deal of information.
Respectfully Yours, brother walt gee
LtCol Samuel Edmundson Watson, USMC, seemingly forgotten once believed future C.O. of the USMC. He was a Capt. of the circa 1830's Marine Barracks, Portsmouth Navy Shipyard, Kittery, Maine, and then a close friend (and I assumed kinsman) of my old New England Watson family of Dover, N.H. His actual Watson ancestry was old Virginia. He was later C.O. of the Marine Barracks, Washington, D.C., and thought a likely future Commandant. He was killed in the Mexican War and (temporarily? buried in the same grave with Maj. Twiggs, Gen. Twiggs' son. I think Twigg's remains were recovered to the U.S. after the war. The fate of LtCol Watson's remains are unknown to me. Somewhere it was alleged LtCol Watson made mistakes in that war; but I know no details. His death so effected the Washington Marine Barracks, that it's officers wore black arm-bands on their uniform sleeve, 30 days (was this then an "official" practice? Is it still official?). Where this should go with the USMC, I do not know? My ancestor, LtCol Robert Wm. James (1840's Holmes Co., Miss., militia, born 1811 Wilmington, N.C., died 1882 Biloxi, Miss) was civil an master of the U.S. Army transport 'Gen. Hamer' out of New Orleans, in the Mexican War. His pension application was denied because as a master, he was civilian. What was the pre-war, and post-war names of the "Gen. Hamer"; it's fate, and origins? ∞ focusoninfinity 18:26, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
http://www.flymcaa.org/getattachment/MCAA-Publications/YellowSheetWinter2012Cunningham.pdf.aspx "Birth" of flight is designated where actual "first flight" took place- in this case, Marblehead, MA, or in the case of the Wright Bros, Kitty Hawk, NC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.250.56.88 (talk) 17:38, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on History of the United States Marine Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.leatherneckmagazine-digital.com/leatherneckmagazine-share/200703/?pg=48When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of the United States Marine Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Please remove the discussion of Confederate marines from the Civil War section of this article--an article specifically about the U.S. Marine Corps. The Confederate States of America, by contrast, was an enemy of the United States that killed U.S. troops--including at least 148 Marines, as the article itself describes. While CSA government and military organization is of real importance to historians, it is not part of U.S. governmental history and so should mostly be confined to its own articles. Conflating Confederate history with U.S. governmental history may please white nationalists, but it has no basis in fact or logic, and it does a disservice to the more than 360,000 U.S. servicemembers who sacrificed their lives to defeat Confederates and their cause. At most, the text describing Confederate marines should be reduced to a sentence linking to Wikipedia's Confederate marine corps article.