Hitman 3 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 28, 2023. (Reviewed version). |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
As per the developer's website and the official announcement trailer as well as other official channels, the proper name of this game is Hitman 3; it's merely stylized as Hitman III in marketing materials. -JFWillson (talk) 13:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
There were/are issues with the transfer of previously purchased levels and the transfer of progress. That may have caused a stir, covered by reliable sources, however that's not a controversy. Now if someone disagrees with my edit to rename that section and that becomes a prolonged and public disagreement with lots of edit warring... that would be a controversy ;-) In this case there's no public disagreement between opposing factions. Just IOI not being particularly clever about things. PizzaMan ♨♨♨ 22:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
In new games, especially this, this information is important and should be added generally to all games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.91.211.93 (talk) 17:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
What will happen to their respective articles?
They will both be retroactively considered parts of a single game in January 26. 80.60.107.130 (talk) 22:24, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
With the announcement that the game is to be renamed Hitman: World of Assassination, what name should the article use? I personally am in favor of keeping the name as Hitman 3 and having the headline be something like "Hitman 3 (later re-titled Hitman: World of Assassination)..." similar to the articles for the first three Star Wars movies. PolarManne (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
I have a few comments:
voorts (talk/contributions) 23:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 14:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I'll begin a read through shortly. ♦ jaguar 14:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
I don't do this often, but I am compelled to give this an outright pass. It is well-written, comprehensive and simply put, presents itself as a fully-fledged good article. It is well referenced and all the sources check out from what I can see. You might consider nominating this at FAC. I've made a couple of minor adjustments too - feel free to check over. Well done, as usual a sterling article from you! ♦ jaguar 14:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)