Todo

[edit]

Needs more on impact, and slightly longer intro. Jdorje 20:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Impact pictures, inline sources. Jdorje 19:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I found an AMS paper talking about Juliette. It turns out that it was one of the wettest tropical cyclones in point storm total rainfall in Baja California for the past quarter century. I'll add the reference/text in the next couple days. Thegreatdr 19:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good find. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good link Hurricanehink (talk) 17:44, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Damages

[edit]

If anyone is curious on how I found the damages, I found that Juliette caused $175 million dollars in damage in 2001, per this site. Though it says dollars, it means pesos, I asked my spanish friend (luckily enough I have one). After that, I converted $175 million pesos to USD using this monetary converter site. I wasn't sure of the date, so I chose late December. Then I inflated it to 2005 USD. If this is disallowed, I can remove it, but feel free to comment if necessary. Hurricanehink 19:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is okay for now, but ultimately we should use GDP deflation for the inflation calculation. — jdorje (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Did we agree on that (I forget)? The whole money thing is a little confusing, so until we change all of them, we should keep it as it is. Hurricanehink 20:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We haven't really agreed yet. But that's how it was done in the Cuba document. I agree, until we start changing all of them, we should keep it as it is. — jdorje (talk) 21:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Hurricanehink 21:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section too short

[edit]

I believe that the lead section for this article is too short compared the the rest of the article. Gummycow moomilk 16:39, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
Passed. Fritzmann (message me) 14:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Juliette (2001)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 01:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Fritzmann2002 (talk · contribs) 01:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Hurricanehink, I'll be taking this review. It's a bit out of my wheelhouse but I'll do my best, so bear with me. Fritzmann (message me) 01:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fritzmann (talk · contribs), whatcha think? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:30, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies for the delay, holiday travel set me back more than I thought it would. 02:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
No worries at all, hope you had safe travels! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

  • That's a tricky thing to prove. We don't usually include when storms don't do something, like if storms fail to cause much damage. So I moved that to the met history. It felt out of place before. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I changed it to more of a space reference, when it was offshore southern Mexico. The wind measurement was a little bit notable since it was gale force, which warranted some tropical storm warnings. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • I think the fact that newspapers covered the storm is more of reflection of its notability, showing up in farflung places. I might be able to replace some of those references with URLs, but that was from the early internet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding Latitude 38, I felt it was useful to include it to have some form of impact outside of Los Cabos. By the nature of reporting, the tourist and popular areas tend to get the most coverage. If that still seems too minor, I can remove it, but I liked having an additional example of impacts. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Summary The article is well written with only a few very minor points of correction. If you wouldn't mind pinging me once you've responded to my nitpicks, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you for a very thorough and informative article! Fritzmann (message me) 02:01, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories