Hurricane Nate (2005) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 9, 2012. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More everything. Damage totals, or other impact on Bermuda would be appreciated. Hurricanehink 20:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
It should be added that the remains of storms Nate and Maria eventually reached Scandinavian shores and killed four people in Norway (see Hatlestad Slide).
Should the death caused by Maria and Nate's rip currents be counted as a death in the infobox? I think it should, but both Maria and Nate together caused the one death. Having one on both places would mess up the totals. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Reading this article, I found it hard to understand. It doesn't pass the criteria for being well-written as the phrasing is awkward and the terminology isn't explained well. The structure is confusing and it could use quite a bit of clarification. Good luck with that and happy wiki-ing! --Keitei (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
I saw this on the list of GA candidates and thought I'd take a look. Overall very good, however a couple of minor things that could be added:
Hope these are useful and congrats for a very informative article. - Suicidalhamster 23:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice article, but a lot of the links are dead now. How many people were killed in Norway? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.218.88 (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
More details: article says 1, the article for the weather in Norway says 3, and this talk page says 4. The link to the source is dead, so I can't confirm from there. It's surprising that Wikipedia chose this article as a featured article without noticing this problem. --69.61.218.88 (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Preposition Use Although "under" may be used informally when you mean "less than" or "fewer than," consider using "less than" or "fewer than" for a more formal or traditional tone. • Instead of: Please buy under 35 pounds of cherries. • Consider: Please buy less than 35 pounds of cherries. • Instead of: We will hire under 60 employees. • Consider: We will hire fewer than 60 employees. Please fix article a bit--77.28.104.213 (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Hurricane Nate (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Nate (2005). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 20 May 2017 (UTC)