This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Christianity: Theology / Saints / Eastern O. / Syriac Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Top-importance). This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Western Asia This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks citations and also treats unverifiable "facts" as truth. It is also clear that it was written by someone who has not studied Isaac extensively. When I get the chance, I'll edit/rewrite the article.Grailknighthero (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I added or Bahrain to a possible location of birth. For more information, see Hansbury, Mary. St. Isaac of Nineveh on the Ascetical Life. St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1989.

Bet Qatraye is a region which includes Bahrain, Qatar, and portions of Eastern Arabia.Grailknighthero (talk) 02:13, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Can anybody confirm whether or not this guy was sainted? Some of the google hits call him "St. Isaac of Nineveh", but Brittanica refers to him as Isaac of Nineveh. Given the sources, I deferred to Britannica when I wrote this stub, but it really isn't my area of expertise. --Scimitar ^parley 15:31, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • He is a saint in the Eastern Orthodox Church. I am not sure about the Assyrian Church of the East Grailknighthero (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Catholic Encyclopedia calls him "Isaac of Nineveh" where he was bishop for some months. An inappropriate descriptor. Everyone else calls him Isaac the Syrian don't they? --Wetman 20:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • It is not an inappropriate descriptor. Not everyone calls him by Isaac the Syrian. It is common among scholarly circles to call him Isaac of Nineveh because he was bishop of Nineveh. One is named after their bishopric. Grailknighthero (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I just was given an icon made at "St. Isaac of Syria Skete". I'm guessing he's a saint in the Assyrian Church of the East in the same way that Pontius Pilate is in the Oriental Orthodox Churches or Charles I is in the Anglican Communion. Carolynparrishfan 02:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He appears to be an Orthodox saint. Check out the skete's website at [1]. Carolynparrishfan 02:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • St. Isaac of Syrian Skete is an Eastern Orthodox Monastery in Boscobell, Wisconsin. It is not Assyrian Church of the East.Grailknighthero (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Isaac THE SYRIAN is venerated in all Eastern Orthodox Churches. We never refer to him as "of Nineveh" - Also, there is no source provided, nor none I can find in any materials related to this saint which even remotely suggest that he was Nestorian, so unless you can source it, that language that weasel-words him in to "maybe" "possibly" being nestorian should be removed. A Nestorian wouldn't be venerated by all The Orthodox (& Roman Catholic) churches. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.138.62 (talk) 03:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • You are wrong when you say that the Orthodox never refer to him as "of Nineveh." True, in the Calendar of Saints he is listed as Isaac the Syrian and he is usually called Isaac the Syrian in other places, but some Orthodox scholars acknowledge that He is also called "of Nineveh." Proof? See above, Mary Hansbury's book is published by SVS Press. Yes, Nestorian should be removed because Isaac and the Church of the East were not Nestorian. As Sebastian Brock suggests, the Church of the East should be labeled as "Theodoran." But there is one chapter within the Second Part, Chapter 11, in which Isaac's Christology is definitely expressed in Theodoran/East Syrian terms. But as far as I know, this is the ONLY chapter within Part I and II in which Isaac's Christology is not compatible with Orthodox Chalcedonian Christology.Grailknighthero (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed a bunch of Bahrain and Qatar cats. Being possibly born in that region more that a thousand years ago doesn't imply that he can be considered Bahraini. --Rafy talk 08:08, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saying that Isaac was Bahrani is as anachronic as claiming that Jesus was Palestinian of that Muhammad was Saudi. Please Ashraf discus you're rationale before including the cat.--Rafy talk 11:50, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, Isaac's exact date of birth and death are unknown. His birth place is known, but I could find only two references stating his date of birth - one states it as 613, and the other states it as 640. I am in a conundrum as to which of them should be included, or if any of them should be included at all. Furthermore, his date of death seems to be a wild guess - but I was able to find multiple (at least 3) notable sources stating his date of death as 700, so it seems to be a generally accepted date.

On another note, his place of death appears to somewhere in Iran. The Quotable Saint and The Encyclopedia of Christian Literature - Volume 2 states it as Rabban Shabur. This makes me wonder why it is currently listed as Nineveh. Elspamo4 (talk) 12:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

It was proposed in this section that Isaac of Nineveh be renamed and moved to Isaac the Syrian. result: Moved per consensus seen below. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply] Move logs: source title · target title This is template ((subst:Requested move/end))

Isaac of Nineveh → Isaac the Syrian – While Isaac is known with both the titles "of Nineveh" and "the Syrian", he is better known as "The Syrian" both in old and modern times. There is no one place I can cite for this, but any small amount of research into him will make this obvious. Swehlam (talk) 01:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC) — Relisting.  –Zfish118^⋉talk 13:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• GEDSH prefer "of Nineveh". Srnec (talk) 13:24, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Christianity has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Western Asia has been notified of this discussion. ❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:37, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: A preponderance of reliable sources should be provided to substantiate the current or proposed name (ie, a brief list of the name each sources uses, if there is no source that directly states the most common or appropriate description). –Zfish118^⋉talk 13:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Move: per sources found in article already. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Move per existing sources, as Pbritti notes. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I've missed the name change conversation, but it'll be worth bearing in mind should it come up for discussion again that (a) Isaac is more commonly referred to as 'Isaac of Nineveh' than 'Isaac the Syrian' in academic literature, especially in the literature on him that's begun to proliferate since the 1980s (e.g. books by Sebastian Brock (1995 and 2022), Sabino Chialà (2002, in Italian), Patrik Hagman (2010), Nestor Kavvadas (2015, in German), Jason Scully (2017), Benedict Vesa (2018), and Valentina Duca (2023); counterexamples such as Hilarion Alfeyev (2015, ed.) and Mary Hansbury (2016) are overall fewer); and (b) 'Isaac the Syrian' is more ambiguous than 'Isaac of Nineveh', since there are at least two other Isaacs who are sometimes referred to as 'Isaac the Syrian', namely Isaac of Antioch (e.g. by Brian Daley, The Hope of the Early Church (1991) p. 174) and Isaac of Spoleto. 131.111.5.135 (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]