This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. U.S. Supreme Court cases Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

I worked on this page as part of the Innovation Law and Policy Editathon hosted by NYU Law School's Engelberg Center. I've significantly re-organized and updated this page. Here's a list of key changes I've made:

• Converted from a list to sortable wikitable
• Added a link to the decision for each case
• Added more cases
• Added information about each case, including vote, opinion authors, general subject matter of the case, and a categorization of whether the case deals with substantive copyright law, litigation procedural issues of copyright law, or is a non-copyright case (with significance for copyright issues).

The following still needs doing

• Summaries need updating/development
• Statute references should be completed or scrapped - unclear how useful this is
• Vote counts probably could use verifying, especially on older cases.

Hope this is useful! Absentminded (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Wonderful! Thanks. Yaay editathons. --Lquilter (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]