This article was nominated for deletion on 6 May 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page was proposed for deletion by LaundryPizza03 (talk · contribs) on 29 April 2022.

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Women scientists Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Red: 2017 This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

• Rembrand Koning et al. (2021). Who do we invent for? Patents by women focus more on women’s health, but few women get to invent. Science doi:10.1126/science.aba6990 Interesting-looking paper on health patents which I can't access. Espresso Addict (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Denise E. Pilato (2016). Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society doi:10.5406/jillistathistsoc.109.4.0374 Interesting article on 1893 fair in Chicago, with some notes on expectations for women inventors eg "Merit, for a woman’s invention, was inextricably linked to how well it reinforced feminine ideals, which were not necessarily merits designating noteworthy technological progress." Espresso Addict (talk) 06:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone object if I tried to reorder by region? It appears be more sensible to group Europe vs N. America &c. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:38, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts on this notion? It seems to me to make it less "pebbles on a beach"-y, but the current order has the advantage of putting the US last, which would be tricky to achieve otherwise (South America, at very least, would end up below the US). Espresso Addict (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]