A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 15, 2018. |
This level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wouldn't the links around atmosphere and venus better point to a page on "the atmosphere of Venus" whcih itself might well point on to pages on "atmosphere" and the rest of th planet?
Unfortunately I know nothing about that atmosphere...
i think because of his mosaics he should be an artist category. I do not like russian painters as he did not paint, should we reverse Category:Russian artists?
Lomonosov was prod to be the first in Russia and one of the first in Europe to restore the ancient art of mosaics. He produced quite a few of them including the Poltava battle depicted on the article. It is in every bio book on Lomonosov abakharev 23:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
This is asserted in several places, but it's not well known. I think it needs to have some backup in this history of Lomonosov, including his exact statement of it, something about his experimental reasons for thinking it, and where he published (we have all that for Lavoisier). Instead, there's hardly anything about it in this history of Lomonosov. If this man really came up with the idea first, it's his most imporant lifetime achievement (since it is a basic conservation law which enabled the science of chemistry to develop from alchemy) so there had better be more about it in the Lomonosov history, if this is to be matter-of-factly asserted in discussions of the conservation laws. Sbharris 20:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
So Lavoisier was also not the one who discovered the law, because people unconciously knew it before ?
Please. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
This page is a mess. Whoever put it together obviously doesn't speak much English. Someone should start over entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.125.46 (talk) 01:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Lomonosov was a srudent of the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. Please read his biography, for instance here: http://ssga.ru/erudites_info/peoples/lomonosov/part01.html. He was a student in Kiev only for a short time. Moreover, there is a plaque on modern Kyiv-Mohyla Academy commemorating this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Plaque_of_Lomonosov.JPG Silin2005 (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
This guy is really interesting. I hope someone can help the article.J8079s (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
They were born just a couple years apart, live din the same times, both were one of greatest mene who ever lived. But who is THE greatest of the two? :) Who was ґsmarterґ, wiser, contributed more, etc? I root for Ben. --KpoT (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Of course, Lomonosov. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.231.0 (talk) 12:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Pomors are considered as a sub-group of Russians, but this does not contradicts to the fact that Lomonosovs were a Pomor family.[4] By analogy, nobody contests that Jan van Eyck was Flemish, and it does not matter, are Flemings a subdivision of some broader nation (such as Dutch people or Belgians) or not. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
I switched this ref over to Sfn. Only about half of these contained page numbers included by the original editor, Historybuff2283, who is now inactive. The others just referenced the book without giving a page number. I just left the page param blank in these cases. INeverCry 00:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Isn't there any other source to access his biography? Most of the information is cited from that source. EkaterinaMir (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
I read some criticism of Lomonosov, namely that his contributions to science were not significant, and much of their significance was drummed up retroactively. Does anyone more knowledgeable on the subject know about these claims? How common are they and do they merit inclusion in the article? —Ynhockey (Talk) 23:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
He anticipated the discoveries of Lavoisier AND got close to the idea of continental drift. It sounds a bit too good to be true. How does the hypothesis of an unknown continental get close to continental drift? This makes me suspicious about the rest of the article. Sceptic1954 (talk) 19:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
I ask moderators to restore a portrait of Lomonosov. I spoiled a portrait mistakenly.Valery Staricov (talk) 14:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
The main source is a Soviet book published under Stalin. Xx236 (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Mikhail Lomonosov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.eduard-belcher.org/belcher-stati5.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Just adding this because it is so amazing. Rudolf Steiner mentions (in 1917-01-15-GA174) that Lomonosov (1711-1765) is the reincarnation of Galileo Galilei (1564-1642): "The soul of Galileo lives again in the Russian Lomonosov". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1811:5382:4F00:49E2:82F8:67A0:736A (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)