This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mission: Space article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Mission: Space. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Mission: Space at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sounds excessively advert-like. Needs wikification.
I don't know why, but there is open code at the bottom of the page!! Someone PLEASE clean this up!
71.125.165.91 16:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Need a source of information besides Disney's promotional stuff. The simulator is, among other things, a centrifuge to simulate g-forces of escaping a gravity well.
I am going to give it some thought. Anyone have suggestions?
WCFrancis 01:48, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
When I try to bold the introduction Mission:SPACE it weirds out the paragraph, making it italics and bold in odd places. Any idea why? - DavidWBrooks 00:02, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Copied from Talk:Mission: Space
The article titled Mission: SPACE has been replaced with a redirect to here. I think that the final project could profit from merging the two articles. -- WCFrancis 01:41, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Copied article back to here (i.e. Mission: SPACE} and put redirect on Mission: Space. --WCFrancis 18:23, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hewlett Packard's teaming with imagineers began in April 2000 and HP merged with Compaq as of May 2002. Statement that HP took over sponsorship when acquired Compaq appears to be incorrect. reference: [1]. --WCFrancis 02:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I came to this article and I clicked on the redirect and no article about Mission:Space came up. --12.222.121.79 04:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
I just can't see how a four-year-old even get on the ride in the first place, let alone his parents allowing him to go when they knew what kind of ride it was. How was a 4-year-old tall enough??! It all does not make sense to me.--Martin925 01:50, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I've been to Epcot and after you leave the Mission: SPACE, there is a place where you can play various games. There is an area where you can participate in a futuristic space race. There is an online version of the space race at http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/wdw/special/missionspace/gameDetail?id=SpaceRaceGameDetail&appRedirect=/wdw/special/missionspace/screenname?. I'm just wondering, should I add this to the page? Tiggs 16:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
There seems to be a contradiction about the g-forces exerted on this ride. The attraction facts on the page say 2g, but the ride mechanics state there is 2.4g. Which is correct? --Imhungry 17:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I worked at this attraction, and know that the horizontal axis g-force exerted on riders is approximately 2.3 - 2.5G on the orange-ticket version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.170.34.70 (talk) 04:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I believe Mission: SPACE should be moved to Mission: Space. See Wikipedia:Article titles#Standard English and trademarks. I quote: "Items in full or partial uppercase (such as Invader ZIM) should have standard capitalization (Invader Zim); however, if the name is ambiguous, and one meaning is usually capitalized, this is one possible method of disambiguation." Mission: Space is certainly not ambiguous, so we should follow standard capitalization and move the article. If no one objects to the move, I will carry it out. David1217 (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
As no one has objected to the move within a week, I am carrying out the name change. David1217 (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Oops, I forgot that the name had been previously been changed from Mission: Space to Mission: SPACE, which makes my move proposal controversial. See my requested move below.
The result of the discussion was: page moved. JohnCD (talk) 20:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
Mission: SPACE → Mission: Space – In Wikipedia:Article titles#Standard English and trademarks, it says, "Items in full or partial uppercase should have standard capitalization; however, if the name is ambiguous, and one meaning is usually capitalized, this is one possible method of disambiguation." Mission: Space is not ambiguous, because it redirects straight back to the article. Thoughts? David1217 (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)