Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. SimulaserVP (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (contributor was employed by Simulaser during the periods discussed in the article)

I was wondering if anyone knew about a place where a civ can study combat with miles. I would be intrested to try it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.74.114 (talk) 00:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How commonly used is it? -Toptomcat 20:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I re-classed this as a B-class in quality. It MAY only be a Start-class because of B-class criteria #1, "It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. " I think that this is met (barely) by the list of external links. It needs to be much better, but since the article meets the other four B-class criteria and is significantly better in quality than the simple Start-class criteria, I believed this to be appropriate. VigilancePrime (talk) 03:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well the Army regulars might not use it but this image shows a Pakistani SSG squad during an exercise with MILES attatched to their M4 carbines

IMAGE CHANGED i dont know why but the image showed some fruit sellers instead,anyway http://www.statesman.com.pk/pictures/Px06-035.jpg

Back up the list of users with sources or don't type them in the first place, to my knowledge, and 5 years in the RDF, neither the Irish RDF or PDF use the MILES system.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Multiple integrated laser engagement system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006114119/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/MultipleIntegratedLaserEngagement/index.html to http://www.lockheedmartin.com/products/MultipleIntegratedLaserEngagement/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150119045217/http://www.saabgroup.com/Global/Documents%20and%20Images/Land/Training%20and%20Simulation/Live%20Training/CVTESS_web.pdf to http://www.saabgroup.com/Global/Documents%20and%20Images/Land/Training%20and%20Simulation/Live%20Training/CVTESS_web.pdf/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:20, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Multiple integrated laser engagement system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100419222541/http://www.megaforce.in.th/ to http://www.megaforce.in.th/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:30, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed in this section that Multiple integrated laser engagement system be renamed and moved to Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use ((subst:requested move)). Do not use ((requested move/dated)) directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Multiple integrated laser engagement system → Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System – Revert unexplained undiscussed move. It is a proper noun. Schierbecker (talk) 08:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Military history has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:38, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it is a proper noun, then why isn't it capitalized in the article text? Bensci54 (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per WP:CAPITALIZATION, Article titles should be in sentence case, not title case. Unless the title is a proper name, which I doubt. Vpab15 (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]