This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is the purpose of this article? Please explain. Is it to report facts. If so, wikipedia is not a newspaper. The originator needs to re-write this article giving an introduction to this person. Refer to his conviction and criminal background as well. Just some thoughts. We don't want to just have a POV pushing and building a case against Christians. Recordfreenow (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
The purpose of this article is to describe the killing of Swami Lakshmanananda that happened in the state of Orissa. It is not building any case unless the writing is on the wall. Shyamsunder (talk) 10:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Your addition "The involvement of the Christians in his murder resulted in considerable violence in Orissa", is not having any support in the reference provided.
What is the editor trying to prove? Also, you need to use specific names and not broad categorizations. Example: VHP rather than Hindus in case of radical behaviour. Recordfreenow (talk) 04:54, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Recordfreenow (talk) 17:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Let us agree that the murder was an act of anti-Christian violence by Hindus. Fortunately, the Swami has not been accused of rape yet. Before long, he might be so accused here.
I suggest that article be merged to this article. That person is nowhere notability. Only the killing of him is notable. --SkyWalker (talk) 18:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Swami's biography deserves separate section -- How can "killing of swami" became notable without making "swami" notable in the process? The fact that killing was notable alone makes swami notable. Many notables become notable due to a single event(e.g. Rosa Parks). Moreover, Swami was notable prior to his murder and there was ample media coverage mostly due to half a dozen attacks on him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unbiasedpov (talk • contribs) 03:20, 29 November 2008 (UTC) — Unbiasedpov (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Three responses. Yourself and banned troll Googlean (a banned sockpuppeteering troll) do not equal 3. 1 + 0 != 3. Next, I removed the tag nearly a month after no one had posted on the page. After I give you a place to find enough sources to staff the article, you have the audacity to not only claim that you cannot find any (a sign of incompetence on your part rather than any scarcity of sources) but also to term my edits disruptive when it is you who has been hobnobbing with trolls and sockpuppets.Pectoretalk 05:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Murder of Swami Lakshmanananda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore))
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot))
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Murder of Swami Lakshmanananda. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
((dead link))
tag to http://www.indianexpress.com/story/353136.html((dead link))
tag to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl2519/stories/20080926251900400.htmWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
@Unbiasedpov and Pectore: Please provide sources describing this murder as religious violence/violence targetting a Hindu because of his religion, or expect to be reverted again. That template is for religious violence directed at Hindus; not for violence in which the victims are, incidentally, Hindus (otherwise most violence in India would qualify, statistically speaking). Please also note that per WP:BURDEN, you are required to demonstrate the verifiability of the information you are adding, otherwise you are indulging in original research. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
This page was created with unverified news for creating communal hatred. Please delete this page. Lokeshkumar007 (talk) 11:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Deceitful accusations against Christians for the assaination, even after no references or proof of the involvement was provided. It seems to just blame Christians to justify the clense their population during the 2008 Kandhamal violence, by Hindu fanatics. HarHarMahadev2000 (talk) 18:14, 28 June 2024 (UTC)