Good articleNatalie Portman has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 8, 2006Good article nomineeListed
January 23, 2016Good article reassessmentDelisted
September 29, 2022Good article nomineeListed
October 28, 2022Peer reviewNot reviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 12, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Natalie Portman was a co-author on a scientific paper about frontal lobe activation?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 9, 2021.
Current status: Good article


Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2024[edit]

In the section on Awards, the last line says that Portman has been nominated for two additional Golden Globes, one for Best Supporting Actress for ‘Anywhere But Here’ and one for Best Actress in a Motion Picture Drama for ‘Jackie.’ Portman has received a third additional Golden Globe nomination, for Best Actress in a Motion Picture - Musical or Comedy for ‘May December.’ 66.44.23.108 (talk) 05:10, 13 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 19:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mention in Scientific American article[edit]

Actress Natalie Portman boasts the rare distinction of having an Erdős number (five) and a Bacon number (two) because of her neuroscience publication as an undergraduate. (Natalie Hershlag is her birth name.)Murtagh, Jack (2024-01-24). "This Nomadic Eccentric Was the Most Prolific Mathematician in History". Scientific American. Retrieved 2024-01-25.

The Wikidata record for the neuroscience paper is at Frontal lobe activation during object permanence: data from near-infrared spectroscopy (Q25975509).

I will leave it up to more prolific editors of this article, like Krimuk2.0, to decide whether any of this, such as the neuroscience paper authorship, is appropriate for inclusion or not. Peaceray (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There was a prior discussion related to this here. Pinging some of the involved editors: KyleJoan, General Ization, Sundayclose. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:51, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Based on the consensuses out of that discussion and this RfC, this material should remain excluded. One extra source (i.e., the SciAm opinion piece, in which Portman is only briefly mentioned) does not render the responses in those discussions less relevant or applicable. KyleJoantalk 08:45, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]