Some inaccuracies[edit]

Some inaccuracies appeared in the Leadership section (and other sections) of this article on 4 Sept, through the efforts of an anonymous poster [213.34.251.81]. Here is the summary of the inaccurate info that was added to the article on 4 Sept, and has been subsequently fixed:

The version of Barek dated 16 August 2008 is the more factually accurate version, so the content has been reverted to that. The prior citations have also been restored, since the new citations are not relevant and do not add any new factual information not present in the previous citations. Tracktowner (talk) 02:10, 8 September 2008(UTC)

Tags[edit]

I've remove the OR tag since its not addressed on the talk page. The refimprove tag may still be valid, but the article is sufficiently well refferenced that it's better to tag individual statements now. Rich Farmbrough, 12:15 8 September 2008 (GMT).

++++++++++++++++++++++

Can someone please explain what a 'low-gravity treadmill' is - and how it can be operated on a planet of constant mass....? Cheers Mark

++++++++++++++++++++++ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.135.102.65 (talk) 10:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

First paragraph has an advertising tone[edit]

In the introductory paragraph, lots of it seems like an advertisement. "Elite coaching, revolutionary training and use of air thinning technology" seems sensationalized to me. Also the part in that paragraph that talks about the high altitude house seems oddly specific and I think it needs its own section. Agree or disagree?AlexDFischer (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]