body.skin-vector-2022 .mw-parser-output .skiptotalk,body.mw-mf .mw-parser-output .skiptotalk{display:none}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a{display:block;text-align:center;font-style:italic;line-height:1.9}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::before,.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::after{content:"↓";font-size:larger;line-height:1.6;font-style:normal}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::before{float:left}.mw-parser-output .skiptotalk a::after{float:right}Skip to table of contents
Good articleNuevas Ideas has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2023Good article nomineeListed

References[edit]

can you please use references in english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.32.148.110 (talk) 04:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cyan[edit]

is it really cyan? for me its clearly light blue Braganza (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The party's color is cyan, specifically process cyan, as per the party's statutes and virtually every news outlet referring to the party's representation in the Legislative Assembly as the "cyan bench". PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 09:28, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PizzaKing13: does cyan have the same meaning in spanish though?
How about calling it azure Braganza (talk) 08:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it is light blue (as much as they call themselves "cyan". Process cyan is #00B7EB while the flag on the article is #00AFEF. I'm afraid @PizzaKing13 is editing according to his bias for supporting president Bukele (which he admits on his talk page).
TanookiKoopa (talk) 10:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology[edit]

"While Bukele himself has been described as a conservative politician" It should be mentioned that he was seen as a left leaning politician before he came to power.They only began to be describe him as conservative only after he spent a few months in office. Smahwk (talk) 11:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on political spectrum[edit]

Yeah this page seems to be edited a lot in terms of "political spectrum". I 100% think that if we're going to keep it, it should be "Centre to centre-right". Right now it's "syncretic" with no sources explaining how, I don't think that there's anything "left-wing" about it personally but I wouldn't call syncretic an accurate description. It just feels like a buzzword. I personally think we should just delete the whole "spectrum" part. Gnerkistanislaviyort (talk) 08:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Nuevas Ideas/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 16:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Solid work and pretty exhaustive. Good on you for maintaining NPOV despite supporting the party, too. Just some copy tweaks to be done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 16:46, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie: Thanks for your comments. I've made some changes. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 18:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes[edit]

Lead[edit]

History[edit]

Symbols[edit]

Spot checks[edit]

Images[edit]

There are three images, each CC-licensed. The first is cropped from the original. (Nice grab on the one from Wilbur Ross's official Twitter.) The party symbols in the infobox are below the threshold of originality. All have alt text.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ideology 2[edit]

Source 91 FES does not say anywhere that NI is left-wing. The first quote you mentioned only states that NI has attracted left-wing voters, and the second quote groups it with left-wing parties, but with the context of the first quote, that doesn't correlate that NI is left-wing as it would be referring to its left-wing voters. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 04:38, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, the first reference does not mention it, but it has absolutely nothing to do with it. Its voters can be left-wing and the party as well 2800:2503:4:C66B:1965:29AC:AD21:D46D (talk) 09:56, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, how are you? To begin with, the article clearly speaks of the party as a left-wing one. It does not literally say "Nuevas Ideas, of the left" but it makes it very explicit, in addition to referring to its voters in this way. Therefore, I suggest that the information be added again. There is no reason why this information should not be in the article. Best regards.

2800:2503:4:C66B:375B:454C:859E:B0B2 (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And (although nothing to do with the previous discussion),if I can add it, here is a reference that the party defends a welfare social state: https://revistas.ues.edu.sv/index.php/rcs/article/download/2511/2513/6123. 2800:2503:4:C66B:DDD1:C8E1:8B3D:5102 (talk) 10:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Political position[edit]

I think the party's position needs to change since the "big tent" category is very vague and simplistic for this type of parties. I think we should reach an agreement to change his political position. We should add syncretism as a position and state that it combines policies of populist neo-Keynesian center-leftism in the economic sphere (such as the donation of computers, the free use of many sectors, price controls, high taxes, etc.) with conservative (or ultraconservative) right-wing policies in the social sphere ( such as his position against abortion, LGBT rights, equal marriage, etc.). Bukelist argentinian (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have multiple sources which state it is syncretic. It is currently labeled big tent because the sources state so. Changing it based off of what we perceive it to be would be WP:OR. PizzaKing13 ¡Hablame! 20:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]