Peter Abelard was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 2, 2006 Good article nominee Not listed

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Philosophers / Logic / Religion / Language / Medieval Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Logic Philosophy of religion Philosophy of language Medieval philosophy Composers This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles France High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Musicians / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance). Christianity: Theology / Catholicism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Top-importance). Linguistics: Philosophy of language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force. Middle Ages Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have archived the talk page up to now because it was very big. I have, however, summarized two of its main topics below, for ease of use of readers, especially since the maintenance template for "Close paraphrasing" claims that "Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page."

Over-reliance on EB1911 text

The Peter Abelard article has been subject to critique due to its over-reliance on text from the 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (EB1911). While the use of this historical text provides a foundation, concerns have been raised regarding the relevance, accuracy, and possible copyright infringement. This discussion encapsulates the main points raised by community members.

Numerous users expressed their discontent with the extensive use of the EB1911 text within the article, asserting that it may not necessarily provide the most accurate or comprehensive information. The language used in the EB1911 text is also seen as a barrier to understanding, with users noting some instances of obscure or outdated vocabulary. There were concerns about potential copyright infringement, which were later dismissed upon the realization that the EB1911 text is in the public domain. An evaluation of the article by a contributor to the Composers Project highlighted the reliance on the EB1911 text and its consequences for the quality and credibility of the article.

Specific comments:

• User:BevRowe (April 3, 2003) questions the necessity of pasting content from EB1911, given its wide availability on the web and potential quality issues.
• A discussion regarding the usage of the word "Quasijocando", in November 2005, raised the issue of potential errors in the 1911 text and the use of obscure language that could confuse readers.
• A Composers Project Assessment of the article, by User:Magicpiano (November 20, 2008), underscores that while the EB1911 text contributes to the quality of writing, the lack of inline citations, outdated scholarship, and difficulty in editing hinder the article's overall quality and relevance.
• User:Unfree (December 17, 2009) defends the erudition and the historical significance of the 1911 text, arguing that modern encyclopedias may not necessarily provide better information.
• An anonymous user (November 30, 2010) initially raises the issue of "blatant copyright infringement". However, this concern is dismissed by User:JohnCD who reminds that the 1911 text is in the public domain.
• User:StarTigerJLN (February 4, 2021) removes a 1911 reference, substituting it with a modern Brittanica reference written by an Abelardian scholar, emphasizing that the 1911 reference isn't necessary or particularly good.

Spelling, pronunciation and origin of Abelard's name

There has been some debate about the correct form and pronunciation of Peter Abelard's name in this article. The discussions cover various facets including alternate spellings, accentuation, and pronunciation.

Specific comments:

• User:Lowellian has questioned the source of the claim that Abelard's name was a corruption of Habélardus and that he was given the nickname 'Bajolardus' when he was a student. Lowellian also requested clarification on the meaning of 'Bajolardus'. (12 January 2007)
  • An unregistered user referenced an extract from the New International Encyclopedia which suggested that both 'Abélard' and 'Bajolardus' are epithets of uncertain meaning. They also hinted at potential Latin and French origins of the names. (19 February 2008)
  • User:Unfree added a humorous comment possibly suggesting a link to the medical condition beriberi. (17 December 2009)
• User:DoNNNald proposed that the spelling 'Abelard' should be used without an accent mark as this is the common academic usage, and it aligns with the Latin spelling of the name. This spelling is now standard in the article. (20 July 2007)
  • User:DoNNNald and User:Makemi discussed the standard spelling of Abelard's counterpart, Heloise, and agreed to the non-accented form. (20 July 2007)
• User:StarTigerJLN emphasized the importance of including the French pronunciation of Abelard's name as he was of French origin. (9 February 2021)
• User:Ransouk proposed that the name should be presented as "Pierre Abélard" instead of the anglicized form, Peter Abelard. (18 April 2021)

For the full discussion, you must read the archive at Talk:Peter Abelard/Archive 1, but I recommend that new issues be started here, so that they might be easier to follow, since the page is now shorter. I hope these summaries help make the main issues with the article clear. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 20:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the heading structure in a way that I believe is an improvement.

I found that this article contained a section with a roughly complete publication history of the Letters of Abelard and Heloise, as well as claims about their authenticity and the authenticity of new additions to the Letters corpus. I thought that this was excessive, and created a separate article for the Letters, moving this material there. I also moved some material from the Heloise article, to which the link Letters of Abelard and Heloise had previously been a redirect. Thiagovscoelho (talk) 20:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]