GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Nathan2055 (talk • contribs • count) 17:16, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Immediate problems in the section "Hybrid transformer". Please copyedit the section to fix problems. Fixed as of 19:48, 5 September 2011 (UTC) | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | While one section needs a copyedit (see above), it complies with the manual of style. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | I spotted three citation neededs. Please source those statements. Fixed as of 21:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC). | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | See 2a. Fixed as of 21:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC). | |
2c. it contains no original research. | No original research found. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | I may not have good knowledge in engineering, but it read well enough. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | It looks great, just like a real encyclopedia article. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | You really can't be biased with this kind of article. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars seen. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | All images licensed with Commons-supported free licenses. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Wow! Using figure numbers like in a "For Dummies" book was a great idea! | |
7. Overall assessment. |