((WikiProject banner shell))
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.France: Paris B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
((WikiProject banner shell))
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Libraries B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
((WikiProject banner shell))
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Higher education B‑class | |||||||
|
((WikiProject banner shell))
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Politics B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
There needs to be detailed sections on each of the Sciences-Po 12 master degrees, but especially on the new MPA and MBA programs!
We also need more legitimiately uploaded pictures of Sciences-Po.
The school should be referred to as "Sciences Po" not "the Sciences Po".
I don't understand why the fr were removed: now the names don't link to any article, which is rather silly.
And yes, we don't need mention of the other IEP.
This is how Wikipedia works: when articles don't exist, you write them. Don't forget that about 5.8 billion people don't speak french. Peco 06:23, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
But then it should appear clearly from the fact that there is an article in French and none in English that the English version need be written, no?
You're new here! That what red link means. Peco 09:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm afraid it's not exactly true. The FNSP administrates Sciences po, Sciences po being subbordinated to the FNSP. Peco 15:11, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Nope. Sciences Po refers both to the whole : IEP and FNSP. That the FNSP administers the IEP is barely relevant here and mentioned elsewhere.
Yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. Peco 19:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
A previous discussion with User:81.7.26.202 resolved my confusion w.r.t. the listing of Ambassador Paul Bremer in this article. Since Ambassador Bremer was neither "head of state" and he wasn't the president nor prime minister of Iraq either, his listing was moved to World politics and government. Why has he been moved again? This time he's listed under world governance.
For the benefit of those who are a bit sketchy on the topic, the United States government is partitioned into three main branches of government:
Neither branch has more power over the other; except of course, the President of the United States who has special powers (which apparently is always under both congressional and public scrutiny) that include the authority to veto bills; appoint ambassadors, appoint members of his/her cabinet and the judicial branch (i.e the supreme court); pardon criminals; make executive decisions for the people whom he/she swore to serve, and make use of the United States military as the "Commander in Chief". Ambassador Bremer is not the President of the United States. He was appointed by the President of the United States in 2003 to serve in Iraq (which ended officially on June 28, 2004).
Again, my point is, Ambassador Bremer has been misplaced again.,,,,,<<<<greetings!,,,Ariele 18:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
I appreciate the Constitutional lesson, but I'm American (and the one who listed Bremer under International Governance). I think you do not fully understand the distinction between government, which you outline a bit above, and governance. Governance cannot be defined in such a clear, limited, and anachronistic way. Governance is not government, and Paul Bremer is not listed as head of state or government. He is listed as a head of international governance given that he was the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq. In essence, Bremer was the American proconsul in Iraq. The term governance is not associated with the formal government of any one state, but is more associated with governing - or with political authority, institutions, and, ultimately, control. Governance in this particular sense denotes formal and informal political institutions or individuals that aim to coordinate and control interdependent social relations and that have the ability to enforce decisions within a given organization, state, region, or on the world stage more generally. This would include a head of the Red Cross or CARE International, a UN Secretary-General, and someone like Paul Bremer.
Sorry, but you clearly do not understand what governmance is vis-a-vis government. I suggest you look it up b/c the distinction is certainly not erroneous.
Your explanation for moving his listing [back to your version] under notable alumnus is debatable. The transitional government is a misnomer [my opinion] because Iraqi ministeries were up and running very shortly after the old regime was ousted.
The ambassador's listing under world governance does appear to elevate his status to the far reaches of the universe. Is that how he would have wanted to be remembered?
Is that you again User:Geo Swan?,,,,,<<<haloo again,,,,Ariele 05:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I noticed a few major problems with this article which I have since tried to fix. First, this article was way too long - it included a series of unnecessary information (e.g. listing some 30 institutional alliances in separate sections and sub-sections), and often repeated itself in many areas. Second, there was not a single reference made on the page. Third, there was not a condensed overview of the school listed at the top of the page - this is common for universities on wikipedia, partly b/c it allows people to understand the nature of an article quickly, without having to read or scan the whole article. Anyway, that basically sums up my edits - but I'll certainly try to do more... particularly vis-a-vis referencing.
"Excellence, Innovation, Diversité" is not an actual motto, either official or unofficial, just some recent slogan, used e.g. on the occasion of Condoleezza Rice's remarks in February 2005 [1]. Actually the only Google results are Wikipedia pages... [2]. See the talk page of the article in French.
I also made a minor correction regarding the Sciences Po Library, which has never been a "political science arm" of the BNF.
Keriluamox 12:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Re diacritical marks on capital letters, the referred page http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_des_majuscules_en_fran%C3%A7ais says the opposite: "L'Académie française recommande donc l'usage d'accent ou tréma sur une majuscule, tout comme l'utilisation de la cédille et de la ligature. Ainsi les publications de qualité écrivent-elles les majuscules (tout comme les capitales) avec les accents et autres diacritiques, au même titre que les minuscules. En effet, les signes diacritiques ont un rôle important dans les langues qui les utilisent." No doubt Wikipedia is a quality publication. But I agree that in this case it should be "d'études". Davidships (talk) 16:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Image:Logo-sciences-po.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
This article only mentions the school in Paris, the introduction and the whole layout must change or a new article must be created.Sheodred (talk) 16:03, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
The article École Libre des Sciences Politiques should be merged into this article. It is the same school. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 20:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
I wonder why any mention of Former Prime Minister Jose Socrates as a current student of Po is washed over by this user Life of Gray. I think that to mention this is a valuable asset for this institution since rarely a Prime Minister goes to School after he is in such an elevated position. Once and for all Life of Gray must come here and present is reasoning for being portuguese-phobic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.118.126 (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to Sciences Po has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using ((subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.)) and ((subst:RM bottom)) and remove the ((Requested move/dated|…)) tag, or replace it with the ((subst:Requested move/end|…)) tag. |
Institut d'études politiques de Paris (Sciences Po, Paris) → Sciences Po – Per common name. Rangoon11 (talk) 12:38, 26 September 2012 (UTC)