Citation Flags[edit]

Added citation flags for a number of statements that look quite dubious. Elalan 14:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that it is a major role has to be stated so by an expert in the field. I think that statements needs to be qualified. Elalan 03:40, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Pal, I think the common sense is getting so uncommon nowadays. Do you think the Air Force will fly kites while civil war going on???  ♪♫ĽąĦĩŘǔ_Қ♫♪  (Ŧ) 03:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You still haven't answered any of my questions. How is it that the airforce has a major role to play in the civil war ? You may bring up Defence ministry statements but that is not reliable on this matter. To know it plays a major roles implies it significantly affects something ? This isn't the US airforce we are talking about here. As it stands right know what is being mentioned is an opinion. The airforce, by sheer size can't be argued to be significant. So how does it have a major role to play ? How can you measure that ? This needs to be clarified at very least or its original research. Elalan 05:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
LOL...I think Elalan seems to have a problem with the SL army, navy and airforce. You can edit all you want in here man but the fact is that you guys still cant achieve your dream, so you can get back to ur homeland.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.236.167.92 (talk)

Ranked Highly?[edit]

I think the comment that the Sri Lankan Airforce is quiet biased. In a fact, by technology and size it is far behind 1st World Nations. Maybe the introduction should be re-worded to disinclude this unsourced infomation?

Looks like a totally incompetent bunch. Huge losses, minimal successes. They don't even have a true jetfighter with an on-board radar. Kfir, MiG-27 and their chinese MiG-21F copycats only have fixed radio distance meters, which are worth next to nil in actual combat. They are repeatedly unable to shoot down the rebels' Zlin 143 elementary-trainers-converted-to-light-bombers, even though those planes barely do 250 km/h. Probably even a run-of-the-mill arab air force would rank higher in actual combat value and those guys aren't Einsteins either. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 10:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why would Sri lanka even need a powerful air force, none of its immediate neighbours are bad. The money is better spent on education and development. Daiyusha (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Westland WAH-64 Apache Longbow[edit]

since when does sri lanka operate the Westland WAH-64??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.32.75 (talk) 02:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UAV[edit]

Does Sri Linakan Airforce have any RQ-2 Pioneer...? and IAI Scouts...Scouts have all crashed...only Searcher Mk II and EMIT Blue Horizons II —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.31.110 (talk) 00:32, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ensign of the Sri Lanka Air Force.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Ensign of the Sri Lanka Air Force.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ensign of the Royal Ceylon Air Force.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Ensign of the Royal Ceylon Air Force.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roundel of the Sri Lankan Air Force.svg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Roundel of the Sri Lankan Air Force.svg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SLAF Crest Updation[edit]

Sri Lanka Air Force crest has been updated since 2011.

The New crest has been added to Wikipedia commons: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sri_Lanka_Air_Force_Crest.png

File:Sri Lanka Air Force Crest.png
Sri Lanka Air Force Crest

Attack aircraft fix.[edit]

The MiG-27 helicopter does not exist and should be removed. Technically one special command version and one example was built, but it does not serve outside of Russia. The MiG-24 is the export version of the MiG-23, I added the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSkauai (talk • contribs) 02:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About Mig 29[edit]

SLAF don't have Mig 29! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randeepa (talk • contribs) 17:05, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Sri Lanka Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fighter inventory[edit]

Here are the links:

Related deletion discussion[edit]

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Lanka Air Force Special Air Borne Force. Anyone is welcome to improve this article and link to it from relevant articles. It needs references to the SABF from reliable sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:34, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original procurement numbers[edit]

Again,FOX52,do you mind reading references before randomly deleting stuff!!

This is the article from 2011 you have ignored:

https://www.4aviation.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Sri-Lanka-may11-Scramble-Stefan-Goossens.pdf

This is where it is from:

https://www.4aviation.nl/ https://www.4aviation.nl/tours-overview/

"Aviation offers different kinds of aviation tours. We aim for unique destinations worldwide that enable aviation enthusiasts to thoroughly enjoy their hobby and passion. This can be a ‘regular’ spotters trip, facilitating a visit to an air show or a more substantial and unique behind the scenes visit to an airport, air base or aircraft manufacturing plant. In general plenty of opportunities occur to make great pictures or collect serials. We specialize in military aviation, and can therefore not guarantee exactly what you can expect to see during a tour. The tour guides are experienced aviation enthusiasts and travellers. They offer just that ingredient that makes each tour to a success, both for the aircraft seen during the tour as for the companionship within the group."

These people are plan spotters who organise tours for plane spotters,so they keep track of things like serials - its kind of what these people do,and the numbers seem about right.

If you actually look at the document it also documents aircraft write-offs and crashes which can be verified if you go onto aircraft serial number databases. The thing is look at some of the numbers - the numbers of Mi24 helicopters reported by other sources says 9,and their numbers confirm 9 active and stored examples,plus 2 preserved(there are pictures - one at the air force museum and one at an air force base). The last Kfir crash happened in 2011,and look at the numbers for the Kfir - 1 in service nominally,5 the SL goverment want to overhaul according to Janes and two are preserved. Look at the numbers of remaining aircraft,they mentioned - it was 8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:CA1A:AF00:4E6:46F7:EBD5:872E (talk) 03:12, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Original procurement numbers 2021[edit]

This happened again. Fox52 keeps removing information without checking anything. Aircraft numbers were cited with lots of references to SL media reports and interviews with SL airforce officials. Also subtypes were listed with references. Now its been reverted back to the wrong numbers,with the wrong subtypes of helicopters. You are not checking the references or database links. Flightglobal is not a 100% accurate source as they refer to out of date information. The Mi17 and Mi24/Mi35 have been in operation with the SL armed forces for nearly 30 years,so there are multiple generations of these helicopters in service.

06/10/2021

Again people are using wrong numbers from Flight International,and ignoring far more accurate Sri Lankan military interviews sand sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIKICAT1000 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flightglobal Airforce directory 2022[edit]

This has been published a few days ago and again is inaccurate,and does not match Sri Lankan defence and media sources.

Combat aircraft F-7 5 Special mission King Air 200 (MPA) 2 Transport An-32 4 C-130K 2 MA60 2 Y-8 1 Y-12 8 Combat helicopter Bell 206 4 Bell 212/412 14 Mi-8/17/171 25 Mi-24/35 9 Training aircraft/helicopters FT-7 1 K-8 5 2* Sri Lankan Navy Type Active Combat helicopter Mi-171 4

These numbers are not accurate! For example the SLAF has not had any operational Y8 transports for over a decade! — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIKICAT1000 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flightglobal Airforce directory 2023[edit]

User:FOX 52 Please don't update inventory list based on just flightglobal directory. Data in flightglobal directory is not accurate. There is big mismatch with Sri Lankan defence and media sources.
Example 1 - SLAF has not had any operational Y8 transports for over a decade as mentioned in the last year too.
Example 2 - SLAF does not have 28 Mi17 helicopters. (Please refer local media sources to get latest data)
Example 3 - flightglobal 2023 does not updated with Dornier 228 which inducted to SLAF 2022.

Not sure flightglobal access atleast SLAF offical website before creating their directory.

Clean up is good but please don't update inventory just based on flightglobal which is not accurate. Thanks Randeepa (talk) 05:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Randeepa: in the future if you need to make sourced changes, simply do so - There is no need to discuss which sources are better - Thank you FOX 52 talk! 06:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@FOX 52You keep doing this. In the past accurate figures were inputed with references. You then just wipe them with inaccurate flightglobal numbers and remove comments. WIKICAT1000 (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Look above in 2022. Flightglobal said the slaf had Y8s. The slaf didn't have Y8s for a decade indicated by the databases. There are no videos or pictures of the Y8s flying for decades. SLAF website shows no Y8s:
https://www.airforce.lk/pages.php?pages=aircraft_fleet
In 2021 you wiped detail numbers and every year you do this without checking what you are wiping or reading the references. Every year people have to go through the table and update the numbers and find the references. Its time consuming when it happens every year. WIKICAT1000 (talk) 10:41, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Categories