This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Companies Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the ((portal|Companies)) template Tag company talk pages with the ((WikiProject Companies)) project banner Answer requests for comments Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Pennsylvania Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the ((WikiProject banner shell)) template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Trains Start‑class Mid‑importance Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The request to rename this article to Sunbury Line (Norfolk Southern) has been carried out. If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using ((subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.)) and ((subst:RM bottom)) and remove the ((Requested move/dated|…)) tag, or replace it with the ((subst:Requested move/end|…)) tag.

Sunbury Line → Sunbury Line (Norfolk Southern) – Possible confusion with Sunbury railway line in Melbourne (Australia), which has been requested to be moved to Sunbury line, but it has been objected as it could be confused with this article. Thus, it may be moved to Sunbury line, Melbourne.

I therefore propose this article also be disambiguated. I can help with any AWB edits that arise from making this title a redirect to an eventual dab page. I’m not personally familiar with North American railroads, but I see that it seems standard to disambiguate like this, another example is Phoenix Subdivision (Union Pacific Railroad). Fork99 (talk) 11:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Mackensen: Fork99 (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. I'd suggested this at the other move discussion, and regardless of that move the potential for confusion exists. Mackensen (talk) 14:41, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support the American one has 132 views but the Australian one has 683[[1]] and I don't think capitalization distinguishes as both are specific not generic topics. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]