WikiProject iconSystems Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the field of Control theory.
WikiProject iconElectronics Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

MIMO[edit]

I don't think that MIMO should be redirected to this page. Maybe a link in MIMO, but not erasing that page directly. There could be MIMO information in the other page lost by moving. --Ncc1701zzz 12:55, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I haven't received any comment in 24h, so I will change it, recovering the redirected page to this one and making a link in MIMO.--Ncc1701zzz 11:22, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Changed. If anybody thinks I'm wrong, please add a comment in the discussion, don't change it silently.--Ncc1701zzz 11:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It is interesting that this article relates systems analysis to only one discipline (EE). I don't think that this definition works considering the discipline of System Engineering, etc. Could we agree that this article discusses a specialty area of systems analysis -- perhaps "Systems Analysis (EE)"? Cask05 15:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

this article needs some drastic formatting, especially getting rid of all capitals and indents that cause boxed text. for anyone who is interested in this task, a good reference on wikipedia formatting is at Wikipedia:Cheatsheetfrymaster 07:32, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is the purpose of this article?[edit]

What is this article for? It seems to just be a collection of loosely-connected thoughts, badly formatted, with no references. For example, why does the article delve into a discussion (albeit brief) about LTI systems? The general theme of the article appears to be software development procedures, but this sort of thing is already covered in Software_development_model and the like. I would imagine that this article is verging on appropriate for deletion. Oli Filth 19:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ah, I see now. At some point in the recent past, someone added a load of irrelevant guff. I've now brought the article back to something approaching a sensible state. Oli Filth 19:52, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

List of System Analysis Tools and techniques[edit]

I would like to see a good list of system analysis tools and techniques. This would include:

Flowchart, Venn diagram, Decision Table, Decision Tree, Decision Matrix, Matrix – many kinds, Cause, effect diagram,

Along with others I can’t think of. Where should this best appear? Should it be a section in this article or a separate list? What tools and techniques should be added? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lbeaumont (talkcontribs) 12:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mathematical rigor[edit]

I feel that there really needs to be a rigorous formal mathematical definition of what a "system" is here. As far as I can tell, it seems to be sort of like an operator, but one that is perceived as running "in real time" along with its input. I hope someone who knows more than me can add a section formally defining what a system is. --1.122.182.53 (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]