This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Politics: American B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as High-importance). U.S. Congress B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is about one (or many) Thing(s). Taxation B‑class (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Donald Trump B‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law B‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles B This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 50 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

@SPECIFICO "This is viewed as a red herring by most sources that discuss the trump tax cuts. Cuts for lower income taxpayers are not a significant result of the act, according to mainstream." Please provide the "mainstream" sources that supposedly prove your arguments. Also, I'm concerned that you're engaging in WP:FOLLOWING towards me. X-Editor (talk) 20:49, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPECIFICO You've still haven't responded to my post. Please provide an explanation for my questions above. X-Editor (talk) 00:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPECIFICO "UNDUE. SYNTH." How? The source I provided deems the temporary increase to be notable. I'm not sure how I violated SYNTH when the Bloomberg sentence and other sentence are clearly separate from each other and state their findings separately. "Cited source describes this immediate increase as an insignificant brief uptick it calls a "sugar high"in the context of a 10 year $1.5 trillion cost with no prospect of commensurate trickle-down benefit." I think you're getting the "Paying for Itself" part confused with the "Renewed Investment" part. "no prospect of commensurate trickle-down benefit" What does this have to do with investment? This has more to do with income inequality. "Brief uptick not portrayed as structural, systemic benefits claimed by the bill's supporters" That's true, which is why the article notes the temporary nature of the benefits, but that doesn't mean the temporary benefits should not be included while being contextualized with the decline afterwards, which is what my edit included btw: "However, according to Bloomberg, the bill did temporarily increase investment before investments started to decline shortly after." X-Editor (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Politicsfan4 Lead first sentence should be changed to just "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" since that's its widely known name per WP:COMMONNAME. No other wikipedia page uses that long name of the bill for the lead; it's unnecessary and should be taken out. Phillip Samuel (talk) 00:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to Tax Cuts and Jobs Act has been carried out. If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using ((subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.)) and ((subst:RM bottom)) and remove the ((Requested move/dated|…)) tag, or replace it with the ((subst:Requested move/end|…)) tag.

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 → Tax Cuts and Jobs Act – Per WP:NCGAL § Legislation, both the official short title and common name for this legislation is "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" with no year, and there is no similarly named legislation to confuse it with. Getting rid of the "of 2017" was discussed a few times on the talk page but it seems like it was never formally proposed. –CWenger (^ • @) 19:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]