This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles
Firstly, should notable achievements really include placings lower than 3rd? That seems odd to me. Secondly, I'm really not sure whether the achievements of the Team Curse rosters prior to joining Team Liquid should be included in this list, as they were not Team Liquid's achievements. I would move to create a separate Team Curse page, as I believe the organisation's involvement in eSports is significant enough to warrant it, and to migrate the achievements and history of the roster under Team Curse to that page.
Fred BR (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't at all, every single sports team on Wikipedia lists notable accomplishments. It's not violating any kind of neutrality to differentiate between what is important and what is not. Try reading the guidelines you link and maybe do a tiny bit of research? Fred BR (talk) 04:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I dont play LoL, so I cant judge the importance of all the placings, but the list seems a bit long, compared to the Dota 2 list that only lists TIs and Majors.--Chaosquo (talk) 15:30, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The page is getting a bit messy considering how two major aspects are being discussed, the team and the website. It should probably be split and this page could be made into a disambiguation page to keep both pages at a decent length and to remove clutter. Draconicfire (talk) 04:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportSeems like a good idea, since the two is more or less separate. In the near future as esports gets more coverage it may even be necessary various game divisions from the main team page. It might be better to call the esports team Team Liquid Pro, seeing as its a more natural disambiguation and how the organization refers to itself.--Prisencolin (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support- The websites and the teams are pretty independent from each other. Creating its own article for Liquipedia might be worth it as well, since esports wikis got pretty important in the scenes, but i might be biased on that one, since i am staff for Liquipedia. FO-nTTaX (talk) 15:12, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Where is the sourcing to warrant the split to a separate "website" article? If none shows up, the section would just be merged right back. As it stands, the stuff without sourcing in the article should be reduced if it cannot be referenced. czar00:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The article is about the team and its community website that was created by the same people. I think it should be one article. --Frmorrison (talk) 20:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The website itself may not meet the guidelines for a standalone article. It does not have enough coverage from third party sources and is a part of the Team Liquid organization. CentreLeftRight✉02:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion