He isn't that hard to kill

[edit]

On my very first game through I killed the Master in two turns. I just stood behind the pillar and he couldn't attack me. I walked in front of him when it was my turn and attacked. I got a 400 crit with a minigun (my big guns skill was only 70-some %) and then did about 100 more damage with my next attack and he was dead. He only spawned one super mutant and Dogmeat even lived through the encounter. I was actually fairly disappointed. I'm not here to brag, but saying the Master is a difficult fight is untrue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.111.208.82 (talk) 00:58, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

I would like to point out that Super-mutants are actually capable of reproducing several years after the mutation, however The Master still can be convinced about his failure. This information can be found out in Fallout 2 if you go to New Reno's Cat's Paw brothel with Marcus in your party and ask some action for him. After that, you can ask him about the sterility of mutants and he explains.

Actually, Chris Avellone, who designed New Reno, clearly stated afterwards that Marcus was only joking. Whether or not it was the initial intent or a retcon is unknown.Ausir 03:00, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

[edit]

I dont know how to make a redirect, but the Stealthboy, which is currently highlighted in red in this article is described in brief in the PIPBoy 2000 article, so mabye a redirect is in order Jay-Me 22:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Master (Fallout). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Master (Fallout). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:05, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review following un-redirect.

[edit]

Based on [1] reference order:

  1. 1up feature on Fallout - Single mention of Master as antagonist. Trivial mention, no coverage.
  2. Gameinformer - Single mention as an aspect of movie ideas. Trivial mention, no coverage.
  3. Escapist Mag - Single mention as part of a graphic, no discussion of the character.
  4. Kotaku - Single sentence describing his accent and appearance. No indepth coverage.
  5. Guinness - Unable to personally verify this offline source, but described as "quick fire facts and trivia"
  6. UGO - Best source so far, 2 paragraphs dedicated to character as part of a top 10. Article's context though is "Our favorite Fallout characters" so its not really independent of the series (i.e. no broader context)
  7. Denofgeek - Not convinced DOG is a reliable source, but there's no indepth coverage here beyond "He's the last boss and he's tougher, or you could join him."
  8. Gamespot - Best source now, multiple paragraphs as part of a broader top 10 list of villians.
  9. Gamespot 2 - another list of villians, same source
  10. Gamesradar - Article states was #75 on this list, but the archive does not contain this and the current version of this list at Gamesradar only keeps 30 entries and Master is not there.
  11. Kotaku 2 - 2 sentences, nothing in depth.
  12. PC Gamer - No indepth discussion of the character, a couple paragraphs discussing the gameplay options of fighting him
  13. IGN - Two paragraphs discussing plot elements within the context of "best fallout moments"
  14. GamesRadar - Not about Master but about his location, again a list in the context of "memorable Fallout locations". Not really coverage of the character at all.

Based on this analyze I'm going to restore the redirect. If contended we can check with an AFD to see if it should really exist. Almost everything said here, if important, can be at Fallout's article. Master never appears in any other games. -- ferret (talk) 18:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the redirect was accompanied by a complaint that nothing was ever merged. I have just merged the things that seemed relevant. -- ferret (talk) 19:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Master (Fallout)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Shooterwalker (talk · contribs) 14:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done: Replaced with a more relevant dependent clause.

Thanks for your patience. Going to work through the lead now and give this all a second pass.

  • "Once a human male who was mutated by a mutagen called the Forced Evolutionary Virus (F.E.V.) into an amorphous creature, the Master expanded himself by absorbing other victims." -> "Born Richard Moreau, he was transformed into an amorphous creature by a mutagenic virus, and later absorbed the genetic material of other victims."
  • "The Master's experimentation of the F.E.V. on human subjects led to the creation of the Super Mutants. Deeming humanity inept and Super Mutants to be superior, the Master seeks to transform every human in the wasteland into Super Mutants." -> "He created a race of super mutants after experimenting with the virus, and decided to transform humanity into these mutants to correct for their weakness."
  • "The Master was conceptualized by Fallout's development team as the result of a man, a woman, and a computer terminal being dropped into a virus vat by mutants and morphing together" -> "The Fallout development team created the character concept as a synthesis of a man, a woman, and a computer terminal mutated together."
  • "The character was made morally ambiguous; characterized as a villain with well-intentioned motivations." -> "The character was designed to be morally ambiguous, by creating a villain who saw himself as a hero."
  • "The Master has been praised as among the best villainous characters in video games, especially for his multiple ways of being defeated and his sympathetic nature." -> "The Master has included on several rankings of best video game antagonists, due to his sympathetic nature, and his robust reactions to the player's input."
  • I don't think the footnote is enough to make the identity of the Vault Dweller clear, or make the sentence more readable. I see two valid approaches: write a short sentence introducing the Vault Dweller as the player character, or remove references to the Vault Dweller entirely. (You can easily understand who the Master is without going into detail about the player/Vault Dweller.)
  • "Grey eventually collaborated with trader Harold to lead an expedition into the wasteland to find the source of frequent mutant attacks on Harold's caravans in 2102." -> "Grey met a trader named Harold in 2102, and they form a joint expedition to discover the source of the mutant attacks on Harold's caravans."
  • "This led them to Mariposa Military Base, where the expedition group is overwhelmed by mutant forces, and" -> do a full stop here
  • "According to producer Tim Cain: during the development of Fallout, there was discussion among the development team of mutants dipping people into virus vats to turn them into other mutants" -> "According to producer Tim Cain, the Fallout development team conceived of a faction of mutants who grew their ranks by dipping people into virus vats."
  • "Cain said that after the audio director understood Cain's instruction of when to switch the Master's voice, the development team was glad that they made the Master the antagonist." -> "The development team became confident in their vision after the audio director reacted to the voice-switching concept, and every department believed the Master would be a great antagonist." (switching the order makes this clearer, and flow better as the last sentence.)
  • "The Master received" -> "The Master has received"
  • "Alan Bradley of GamesRadar+ thought the encounter with the Master combined with the contradictory nature of the Cathedral made the Cathedral 'one of the most striking storytelling devices of its era'." -> "Alan Bradley of GamesRadar+ thought the encounter with the Master made the game's final area one the 'one of the most striking storytelling devices of its era'."
  • I'd consider moving the Bradley statement until later (end of pargagraph?), and leading with a statement that focuses more directly on the Master.
  • "and stated 'Every...'" -> ", stating that '[e]very...'"
  • "Ron Whitaker of The Escapist, ranking the Master as among the best video game bosses, said that the Master being "not entirely evil" made him memorable." -> "Ron Whitaker of The Escapist ranked the Master among the best video game boss battles, explaining that the character is memorable because he is 'not entirely evil'."
  • "UGO and Kotaku found the ability to convince the Master that he is wrong to be fun and unforgettable respectively" -> "Multiple journalists especially praised the option to convince the Master that he is wrong, with Kotaku describing it as "unforgettable", and UGO describing it as "fun"." (clearer)
  • "In relation to his confrontation," -> "Praising the final confrontation,"
That should get us all the way there, if not close. Thanks for your patience. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shooterwalker: I have addressed all your request. Lazman321 (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, could you also do a general source reliability and formatting check for the FAC of the article for Fallout (video game) after this review, please? Lazman321 (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Made one or two minor fixes, and was happy to give this article a pass. Thanks for your hard work and congrats on the GA. (I'll add the main game to my watchlist and see if I can work on that in the next week.) Shooterwalker (talk) 13:51, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for the article!.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Categories