This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to leave comments. After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the ((Article history)) template when the FAC closes.

The Structure of Literature has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 24, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books GA‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Literature GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Chicago GA‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles GA This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note to self: Replace current cover with the black hardcover (1954). I think the current version is the paperback cover. czar 01:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Structure of Literature/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Will do. AryKun (talk) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

• Literary criticism truly sounds like the type of topic that is the life of a party.
• "The published version of his doctoral dissertation in the humanities, Goodman" Implies that Goodman is the published dissertation.
• "made in a 1934 article on aesthetics by the author" maybe better as "made by the author in a 1934 article on aesthetics"
• "Goodman's mentor" Mentors, since there's two of them?
• "known as the "Chicago School" and affiliated with Richard McKeon and R. S. Crane" The second part of that clause seems grammatically incorrect.
• Langrum, Robert (June 14, 1954). "No Final Vision". The New Republic. Vol. 130. pp. 25–26. Is not cited.
• James, Mertice M.; Brown, Dorothy, eds. (1955). Goodman, Paul. Structure of literature. p. 365. Has a formatting error.
• Spot-checks:
  • Rodway, A. E. (1955). "A Critical Technocrat". Essays in Criticism. 5 (1): 55–63. Verifies all claims made.
• That's all I have. AryKun (talk) 15:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for the review! I kept "article on aesthetics by the author" so that the following "who" clause refers to Goodman and not aesthetics. "Goodman's mentor" refers to just McKeon, hence that order. And I've edited the rest. Thanks again. czar 12:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]