This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
This article, together with its image should exist to provide necessary informations to anyone who needs it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gorden Cheng (talk • contribs) 09:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Something about the numbers of the new VOA scheme doesn't add up. There are:
193 UN countries | - 180 future VOA | = 13 |
- 8 not eligible for VOA | = 5 | |
- 2 that do not need visas (BT, NP) | = 3 | |
- 1 (India itself) | = 2 (which ??) |
I.e. 2 countries haven gone missing somewhere along the way... Travelbird (talk) 20:06, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
I reverted an edit removing the historical content about VOA from the article. As Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is meant to contain historical information when it is significant. Given that the section removed was significant for the history of the Visa policy of India, I believe it should remain in the article. Feel free to offer thoughts on whether this content is worth including. ~ RobTalk 15:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Is it so hard to arrange a list https://i.imgur.com/gj1IirN.png ? --Twofortnights (talk) 10:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The visa policy between India and Nepal is governed by the 1950 Treaty between the two countries, and establishes a 'Freedom of Movement' regime between the two countries. This is different from a visa-free regime. I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 16:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
This article implies that the only types of visas available are 30 day visas, except for special category visitors such as Pakistanis over the age of 65 who are visiting relatives. This information is incorrect. This is especially implied by the map illustration showing which countries can obtain visas, as the implication is that only a 30 day eVisa is possible. In fact a longer term and better value visa can still be obtained in the traditional manner and the article should at least mention that. หมีขั้วโลก (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
hi any one can update this article because now Visa on arrival to be available at Vizag airport http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/andhra-pradesh/vizag-airport-gets-e-visa-on-arrival-facility/article21808759.ece http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/visaonarrival-at-vizag-airport/article9995179.ece https://www.btwvisas.com/news-and-updates/2017/12/16/green-flag-to-vizag-airport-gets-e-visa-on-arrival-facility http://www.newindianexpress.com/states/andhra-pradesh/2017/dec/15/vizag-airport-gets-mha-permission-for-e-visa-system-1728203.html can u please check this news papers Jeevan naidu (talk) 12:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, As far as I am aware, the e-Visa regime for Chinese passport holders is not cancelled, but temporarily suspended due to COVID-19. It is true that Chinese citizens living in China are barred from applying for an e-visa to India. However, suspension does not equal cancellation. There is no governmental proclamation that indicates India will not resume issuing e-visas after the pandemic wanes. Therefore, I think it is a good idea to put China back on the map and add a note saying that the e-visa policy is suspended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temptation115 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)