This template is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Miniapolis 20:05, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support. The template name should correspond to the article it is a template for. I suspect most readers imagine that the "Republic of China" is a government of China, so this usage is unnecessarily confusing. Kauffner (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose the template move, fix the names of the various articles first (by renaming or splitting) before moving the template. Several of the articles cover some period before 1949, so the template name is right for what it covers. Those article should be split into two before renaming this template. -- 70.24.250.103 (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per Kauffner. The template should subject to the main article, ie Foreign relations of Taiwan. From the moving discussion of the main article, there was no consensus to split the pre-1949 data to another article. The diplomatic missions articles deal fully the contemporary issue, they should also be moved.204.140.157.73 (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support per WP:COMMONNAME and matching the corresponding articles. I'll put in an RM for the articles that still use RoC. Note that some, such as Taiwan–United States relations, are already in the correct form. --BDD (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
