This template is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies articles
I just started a template for topics related to the end of human civilization, humanity, the Earth, and the universe. It's still very much a rough draft right now, and isn't ready for any articles, but eventually it should be wroth something. Named Template:Doomsday for now. --Wasted Sapience 21:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm going to go ahead and add this to a couple of articles in order to get the word out. --Wasted Sapience 21:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
End of the world and Doomsday cover a lot of the same thing, but different terms. I might have called this template "End of the world" and linked to it as the top-level article.. but then I can see why Doomsday was chosen also. How we do we deal with Doomsday vs EOTW and are there any others like that? -- Stbalbach 00:25, 2 April 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If no-one minds, I will delete the astronomical links in the template. Doomsday, according to the article, is a possible ending to all human life, in an scientific or metaphysical way. The ultimate end of the universe doesn't seem part of it, in my humble opinion. --Soetermans (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I've fixed the request, assuming you want it to remain a template. --BDD (talk) 18:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Default oppose. No rationale offered for move, template has a stable name. Template name doesn't always have to match the "header." SnowFire (talk) 20:40, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oppose Template names are often a memorable shorthand to use in ((inserttemplatename)) for editors, not meant to correspond exactly to the title displayed, which may may be formatted in a different way because of layout or other reasons. walkvictor falktalk 18:08, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.