Template:Multiple issues is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should be proposed here first. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multiple issues template. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This template (Template:Articleissues) was considered for deletion on 2007 May 9. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Following User talk:Kanashimi#Expand by language templates in .7B.7BMultiple issues.7D.7D, I would like to discuss here whether or not Category:Expand by language Wikipedia templates should be grouped into ((Multiple issues)). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
I agree this needs to be resolved one way or the other to end the tool conflict. I'm leaning towards including. While Expand Languages may technically not be a "cleanup" issue, that distinction would be lost on the average reader. The wrapper just says "issues" and expanding is an "issue" of some kind. Combining saves valuable real estate and lets readers get to the text faster. MB 14:47, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
((Multiple issues))
begin Using too many individual article message boxes can distract from the article…(emphasis added) and continue in a spirit that seems less concerned with distinguishing among types of messages and more concerned with limiting visual and focal disruption to the reader. --N8wilson 🔔 16:51, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fix it yourself instead of just talking about itper WP:BOLD. It looks like we broke something and I think this reversion is a quick fix while discussion continues. This also shouldn't be misconstrued as a criticism of the initial bold change that the revert undoes - in fact the B in WP:BRD is encouraged and welcomed. In this case, it just took a really long time for the community to notice that the previous bold change might not be the best long term solution and should be discussed further before proceeding. --N8wilson 🔔 14:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I believe the formula representing the Gini-Simpson Diversity Index in this article is inaccurate. There are two possible ways to generate this index but the formula in the article is neither. They don't match the cite in the article at the bottom of the page<ref><http://www.countrysideinfo.co.uk/simpsons.htm >. Slgarry (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
((Multiple issues))
. If possible, please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. If you cannot edit the article's talk page, you can instead make your request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for edits to a protected page. Izno (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2023 (UTC)This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: having example (as well as default) 'y' to 'Enter any text here to replace the word "article" with "section" in the template.' is pretty confusing imo Michael H (talk) 15:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: maybe allow the collapsed by default do be activated trough just 'y'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael21107 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
This edit request to Template:Multiple issues/styles.css has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Per the discussion at WP:IANB#MakeMobileCollapsible gadget, I'd like to propose that we conditionally remove the mw-collapsible [show/hide] links when the page is loaded in Minerva
Diff: Special:Diff/1188836674
/**
* Don't show the [show/hide] toggle in the mobile skin due to
* the deployment of the MakeMobileCollapsibleGadget -- Sohom
**/
body.skin-minerva .multiple-issues-text > .mw-collapsible-toggle {
display: none;
}
I think should be a pretty uncontroversial hack to prevent this issues from showing up :) Lmk if there are any issues (ping @Izno and @Alexis_Jazz) Sohom (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
body
. Let me know if any issues arise. SWinxy (talk) 20:20, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
body
. Would you add that in per the original request? SilverLocust 💬 06:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
body
because (afaik) the browser's parser will select the body element anyway. Is there a place where this can be seen to work vs not? cc Sohom Datta. SWinxy (talk) 01:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
en.m.wikipedia
in the URL rather than en.wikipedia
(i.e., it hides on the desktop site when you explicitly select MinervaNeue, but not on mobile).body
is not what is causing the issue. (I just thought that because when I tried putting it in the /sandbox and then previewing it on mobile, the show/hide button was no longer there in the edit preview. But that seems to have just been odd behavior in the preview.)body
would fix the issue, and just made the edit (since it would either fix it or make no difference). SilverLocust 💬 04:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
body
and now, I became a template editor.) Also, I've found a note in mw:Extension:TemplateStyles#Caveats that explains why this was necessary: "use a selector such as" SilverLocust 💬 11:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)body.skin-vector .myClass
; specification of thebody
element is required and must be followed by a descendant combinator (i.e. the space).