Template:No footnotes is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should be proposed here first. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use ((edit template-protected)) to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

This is the talk page for discussing No footnotes and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

	Reference works NA‑class (inactive)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles NA This article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, 4 April 2022, see discussion. No consensus, 7 March 2007, see discussion.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

• It would be helpful if the text reading "related reading" linked to Wikipedia:Further reading, much as "list of references" and "external links" link to related information respectively. This is a minor change, and shouldn't cause any problems. – Scyrme (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  •  Done. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^put'r there 20:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

    Thanks! – Scyrme (talk) 20:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: Serial comma seems required (more than merely preferable).

Diff:

A876 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:57, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This edit request to Template:No footnotes/doc has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change:

Currently the section How to use has two identical examples on date usage:

This template has a |date= parameter. One way to use this parameter is ((No footnotes|date=February 2024)) but it can be done more explicitly as ((No footnotes|date=February 2024)) (both result in the same output).

I assume one of them is supposed to use `subst` like in Template:More_citations_needed.

I can't see the source so I don't know what's being wrapped in `nowiki` or anything, so it might be more complex than this:

Diff:

Ligaturama (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Completed. For the future, you can edit the documentation page by clicking the edit link in the top-right section of the green documentation, which is usually unprotected. Good catch! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 20:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]