WikiProject iconUnited States Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the aircraft project.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Aviation / North America / United States Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

C-36[edit]

The Bushranger Could you please explain why you reinstated original research in this edit? While some sources do state that the the C-36 may have been the YAL-1, I have yet to see one make a definitive claim that it was, and I've also yet to see any which state that "there is literally no other candidate for the description than the YAL-1." such a statement is purely original research and speculation. For all we know, it could have been a precursor, competitor, or maybe even an entirely unrelated classified project. As of yet, the evidence that the YAL-1 and C-36 are the same is circumstantial, and no reliable sources claim that they are. - ZLEA T\C 02:23, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Because WP:COMMONSENSE - and also WP:BLUE. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I fail to see how WP:COMMONSENSE or WP:BLUE apply in this case, especially since there are a number of other plausible explanations for the YFC-36 designation. No reliable sources state that the YFC-36 and YAL-1 are the same, so WP:BLUE is out the window. I've tagged the "C-36" designation as unconfirmed, but the link remains for now. - ZLEA T\C 13:27, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]