This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Conflict of Interest policies does not prohibit persons from participation in the least. It does mean if I write an article about myself and you updated it with information I shouldn't go removing all your edits.

Leewells2000 (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Interior 15:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

I confirm that I share your personal classroom experience, in London in the mid-1960s; and at the age of 10 we did not read a simplified version. It is difficult to correct the misleading impression because it is quoting a cited reference: perhaps we should remove the citation and change it to "until the 1960s"?Jezza (talk) 18:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi AllyD, The SafePeak wiki page exists on the wikipedia for several years and provides a summary brief about the company and the technology that was developed there. Lately, the company entered into a technology IP acquisition with ScaleBase, which moved the focus from the corporate website to the acquirer. In addition, the company plans to have the safepeak website to be reinstalled, under a different domain, a process that is in place. I added many several links/references/citations of external sources about the company and its technology, and also made special attention to make sure there is no bias due to COI. Hopefully this will in line with Wikipedia's policies. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladimirvex (talk • contribs) 12:38, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi AllyD, I appreciate your help. However, in the biographical article Jadranka Skorin-Kapov citations include official web pages from the university, not written by the subject of the article, they are about the subject. The two book references are wrtitten by the subject, but are published by independent respectable publishers and the text in the article refers to the text printed on the back covers of hte books. Would this be sufficient for establishing verification?Hatripet (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

• Replied at User talk:Hatripet. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

• Thanks. I agree about notability and the need for reliable 3rd party sources, but it seems that verification can be established based on the sources listed, so that there is one less issue with the article.Hatripet (talk) 13:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi AllyD,

We do ask your help to provide citation that I am a friend of Kristin Leachman and had been asked by her to place the information that she had provided on her site within a Wikipedia page for more of the world to see and know. I had also emailed her when the issue arose about the copyright item, and she had agreed that this was the information that she needed some help in placing on Wikipedia. I am not in this for fame or fortune, just to help out someone that did not understand (or want to understand how to use Wikipedia).

Thanks for your help, Tylerdigital (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect How to upload profiles on wikipedia. Since you had some involvement with the How to upload profiles on wikipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi AllyD, thanks for your suggestion, but let it be separate because page is made for "book:Bhat, Daskroi". And for book our team need all the sections will need in separate page. I also request you to help us on our article issues, I would like to let know that I'm new on Wikipedia, help us removing some unwanted tags. Our information is 100% right and all info are as per government authorization. Do the needful please, and Thanks again. Villagebhat (talk) 02:07, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

• Replied on User talk:Villagebhat. AllyD (talk) 08:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Just thought I should let you know. Arjun G. Menon (talk · mail) 20:01, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ally ,

Please do not mark this page for deletion as Hemant Bhandari is a very rewnoned person in Sate and he is very good social work for needy people.

Krdrs (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

What the problem with page deletion with KushaGra AsaTi i have added notavility tags etc and all . Remove the tag Kimji like (talk) 09:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Prof tpms. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Lingapuram, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Prof TPMS (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Hey , If you are Reviewing my Articles Please inform me in a formal Way , Don not Delete the Article I hope you Let me know Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddoes30 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove any of our pictures or content we have uploaded. We are the owners of Bausch Advanced Technology Group and have full copyright over all our images. This is our company and our pictures we have taken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BATG115 (talk • contribs) 18:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm not sure as to why the page, TechFly, has been marked for deletion. It has been collectively written by both fans and our own editorial team alike and holds a few references to other sources. We're still trying to track down suitable citations for some figures and some facts.

Yours,

Charlie — Preceding unsigned comment added by CharlieJamesTennant (talk • contribs) 22:42, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @CharlieJamesTennant: If you want to have your opinions heard in the deletion discussion, please leave them at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechFly. Comments you make here will not affect the discussion there, nor the actions that result from it. --Drm310 (talk) 17:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I've just noticed that you warned Sksamudre regarding placing copy and pastes of mainspace content vertablim in talk-space a couple of days ago. Just a courtesy notification that I've just came across another instance of it occuring at Passion Movies Pvt. Ltd's talk page, which I have removed. Leaving it up to you whether you want to take it further. Regards -- sandgemADDICT ^yeah? 08:59, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed you placed the "not English" template on ചക്കളത്തിപ്പോരാട്ടം but did not add it to Wikipedia:Pages needing translation into English (WP:PNT). If it is listed there it brings the article to the attention of more people capable of translating it. I have added it for you. Thanks, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 10:13, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Amir Murad Tawas Kheil. I do not think that Amir Murad Tawas Kheil fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "from 2010 till 2015 he was Voice President of ANP in Dubai." is a claim of significance. I request that you consider not re-tagging Amir Murad Tawas Kheil for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 16:51, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

I am the webmaster of renchispace.com that content is mine...I thought it would be understood that someone who is writing about a renchi design philosophy would likely be either the owner of renchispace.com or an affiliate of the website which is home to the design philosophy but I guess that was missed.

anyways, please let me know the correct way to explain to you that I own the copyright to my own images, hency why I checked "these are my images" checkbox when I uploaded those images.

• The above comment has been added by an IP editor, which I presume to be User:Racercafe, who contributed the article Renchi design. Given what is said, I will place the standard Conflict of Interest guidance at User talk:Racercafe. AllyD (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

I noticed you have put a deletion tag on my article. It only mentioned facts and nothing in praise of the company, but wikipedia deleted it again and again for reason like unambiguous advertising. I would be grateful to you if you could give suggestions regarding my Article.

• My first suggestions are to (1) declare interest per WP:DISCLOSE and (2) to desist from removing speedy-deletion and COI tags. AllyD (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Done as you suggested. Removing the Speedy deletion was not intentional. Sorry for that. Can you suggest anything further for my article. i really want it to happen.

Good call, thank you! ricjl (talk) 10:12, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for you review. I disclose that I have an affiliation with Peiffer Rosca Wolf Company. I believe that all content is sourced from reliable newspapers and online publications as New York Times, WSJ etc. Any suggestions on how I can rewrite it to comply wiki policy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danmitroi2016 (talk • contribs) 11:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Good evening Dear Sir, I created the article Statue of Yuriy Dolgorukiy, Moskow, but due to my mistake in the name of city (must be Moscow and I wrote Moskow) I had to change name of article. As I understand no other article Statue of Yuriy Dolgorukiy, Moscow or about Statue of Yuriy Dolgorukiy in Moscow the English Wikipedia has not. I checked beforehand.

BRGDS Грищук ЮН (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

The author may be uncooperative, he has alredy removed the template.Xx236 (talk) 11:39, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi AllyD - Shelley Yoelin is a famous tenor saxophonist. His name is red. So is another name listed on the page. That's not a reason to delete it. Thanks, 301man (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC) 301man

• See the note in the box at the top of the editing window for the List article: "This list is subject to the Biographies of living persons (lists) policy and the lists of people guideline. Please familiarize yourself with both before editing this list. In addition, note that a reliable source that justifies inclusion in this list must be provided for any new entry.". AllyD (talk) 07:48, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

AllyD: I appreciate your advices, and yes I do have a COI on page Computer Systems Institute since I am in charge of CSI's marketing. I have been a volunteer editor of Wikipedia since 2008 (this account only for my job at CSI) and I fully understand and respect the rules here. I will disclose my COI as you suggested. As you might seen the editing war of this page started on April 2016, with high volume of IP-vandalism, most of them untruthful accusation and personal attacks on company leadership. If the tension continues I might apply for semi-protection on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BohaoZhaoCSI (talk • contribs) 15:47, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

What is the Burmese name? Is there such a page in Burmese Wikipedia? Xx236 (talk) 07:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

• @User:Xx236, best ask someone with a local background in that language! I only checked for an English-language source as part of WP:NPP and added it as a references to the new article. AllyD (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Dear user AllyD, why you deleted the information I pasted about the company? How can I properly write this information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kompaniya (talk • contribs) 07:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Dear user AllyD, why you deleted the information I pasted about the company? How can I properly write this information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kompaniya (talk • contribs) 08:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

• See the linked articles provided when the article was nominated for speedy-deletion on grounds of being promotional. AllyD (talk) 08:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
• ok, thank you. Can you help me to create this article? 08:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kompaniya (talk • contribs)

allyD , The citations and reference had been provided , if any editing is required then please Edit the article as per Wikipedia guidelines - thanks., — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpadma (talk • contribs) 07:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

• See response on Talk:Poonam Jha. AllyD (talk) 07:28, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Added more citations and references , please review again now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpadma (talk • contribs) 07:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. 20:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Thanks for reviewing my page I made :) Yselnne (talk) 03:11, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

please help me to create article talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunny880 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Please reassess your input on the article Audrey Bagley. You voted: Delete: A Highbeam search returns nothing and Google returns the usual social media and primary sources. No evidence of WP:CREATIVE or broader biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your vote to add the debate to the list of Band and Musicians list is not applicable as this wiki link is an animation artist. Independent sources updated do indicate notability - see criteria listed on Audrey Bagley. evidence of WP:CREATIVE or broader biographical notability is provided. Under section 3 of WP:CREATIVE The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilady03 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

• I did not add the debate to particular watch lists: if you look at the text you have quoted, that was done by someone else after I had placed my opinion. AllyD (talk) 19:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Gbawden. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Zac Hall, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Elected member of a parliament, so meets WP:POLITICIAN #1, verified at the parliament's website. AllyD (talk) 11:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
  • Sorry I was trying out page curation and hit the tick button not realising it had already been curated Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Ah, easily done: the accidental hit on the Undo button etc! AllyD (talk) 13:24, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I placed an UNDER CONSTRUCTION template for a reason. The article is still being constructed. I am making improvements and modifications.

Batreeqah ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 17:06, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

• An "Under Construction" tag is not an exemption allowing advertising of a commercial service. AllyD (talk) 17:26, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Olaniyan Olushola. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Foluke Adeboye, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 17:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

HI AllyD, I have done as instructed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stunnerggg (talk • contribs) 14:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Always pager of this article suggested for delectation so, I will try with different Name. BecauseMr. dev has Many Public Names....such as Dev, Shiva, Gulgulwa, A real Farmwr, A real Leader, Father Of Nepalese Farmers etc. so we can wright with different name . Pel...help me whats there mistakes and edit if you can otherwise never mark for delectation bcoz I am try m best. User:Dev_Dhawal —Preceding undated comment added 08:19, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:25, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Please make this page M Bilal Arif Acphalia (talk) 09:55, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

thanks for your comments on the wikipage about Sharon Christian. I believe all the facts are now supported by verifiable and reliable sources.Icareaboutart (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for your invaluable contributions to The Wikipedia Library as a coordinator. As you might know, it currently is a tough job to keep every coordinator updated on announcements, and to get in touch with fellow coordinators. We are beefing things up a notch for better communication among the coordinators of TWL. Flawless means of communication is crucial for the success of any team. Hence, we've decided it is essential for all coordinators (existing and new) to be subscribed to our mailing list wikipedia-librarylists.wikimedia.org. I've added your email ID (the one used for correspondence with TWL) to the subscription list of the mailing list. You are of course welcome to use a email ID of your preference unsubscribing this one. When subscribing, please make sure you include your Wikipedia username in the field "Your name (optional):" to help us keep track of subscriptions. Either way it is crucial that you are subscribed to the list.

You can change your preferences by logging into the interface here. You should have received a welcome mail which contains the password to access your account in the mailing list.

Please contact me (User:UY Scuti), or Jake (User:Ocaasi) or Nikkimaria (User:Nikkimaria) if you have any questions/concerns/issues. Regards—UY Scuti ^Talk 17:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Cotton2. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jaditoner, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cotton2 (talk) 08:26, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Software glitch, no tags on article, but showed as reviewed status. Thanks for reviewing. Cotton2 (talk) 08:31, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism of a user registered in the article :Barranco de Badajoz.--83.55.88.100 (talk) 15:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

This page is a copy vio too. Lead is copied from http://www.emersonindustrial.com/en-IN/Electric-Power-Generation/Pages/home.aspx.
FYI, regards --220 of ^Borg 07:26, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Dear AllyD, you did review twice my creation of Impak Finance article. I since made a major upheaval of it in order to correct the flaws in it, yet I still am unsured if it would pass wikipedia's filter. Since you did put the page for AfD and none other than me commented on it, I felt the survival of the article may rely entirely on you.

I truly do wish to at least make it available so at least the open source nature of Wikipedia may join in it's contribution. I made the following corrections:

• I indeed reviewed the self-promotion prose of the first article in the aim of making it truly neutral. I truly hope I succeeded.
• I worked on the notability issue. I reattached the two references from canadian national medias, but this is the part that indeed does make me unsure about the article. While both are independent and notable, they are in french and they are, well, only two (I couldn't find a minimal number of references needed on the wikipedia notability rule page). This is the one that leaves me most uncomfortable, I truly hope the article may pass this filter.

So anyway, I rely on you about it. I hope the changes were good enough. Otherwise, it's okay, I saved a copy and will try again another day.

Thank you very much

Et443367 (talk) 16:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Dear AllyD, you reviewed my article on Professee. You have raised 3 flags: 1- A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. I understand the first one to mean that you consider me too close to the subject of the article. Then who should write/edit the article to solve this issue? 2- The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for products and services. This topic is about an online game, how does it relate to the notability guidelines? Can you please give an example of what I have wrong? 3- This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Most of the info is from one source which is the portal of the game, but the information is true and referenced. How should this be changed?

I'd appreciate any and all help as I'm a first time Wikipedia contributor.

Please note that I changed around the number and content of references, and also reduced from external links. Is this enough to remove the tag "This article relies too much on references to primary sources."?

Seecosm (talk 14:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

• No, the references need to be what other people have said, not what the Professee site or Facebook says about it. Only reliable 3rd party sources are suitable and can establish whether this product is notable. AllyD (talk) 14:07, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

She is not writing for herself! She saved my sister from taking her own life, due to cyber bullying. After that she became my mentor and I am simply using her account to make this page for her. She has helped a lot of women and men. The only reason she signed to be on the show the daily push is so she could reach a lot more people (since the show is worldwide) on cyberstalking. If I need to created my own account to clear up any confusion please let me know, bc I am writing his not her. Krisdegioia (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

I have replied on this user's talk page to a similar message. JohnCD (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

How dare you!! Please provide the original information ASAP DJSTELLA (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

• Replied on User Talk page. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi AllyD, Thanks for checking my first wikipedia article i.e. SunTecIndia. I noticed that you nominated it for speedly deletion and the reasons i can see are:

1. 1: It does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant.
2. 2: The article appears to be about an organization or company

Well, i completely agree with those highlighted stuffs and have also taken some actions by removing the text/content that were looking promotional or not standing for an encyclopedia information. I request you to please check that.

Also, as a newbie in creating a wiki article. I want to ask some questions from above mentioned two points and I will be glad if you can help me this this. Because, this will help me to improve my understanding and knowledge of Wikipedia.

Question #1: Is the subject is not important then why this company page is still present https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prodapt_Solutions. Because, as i can read this, i did not find any useful information and many things relates to the things i mentioned in my article. And, there are many pages like this. So, whats the secret ingredient for that

Question: #2: Yes! its ia bout an organization or company and there are again many pages in Wikipedia reffering to any company or organization page. And, i created this page so that community should know the history of an 17 years old IT firm, which will actually help them to understand more on the firm.

And, i guess almost all brand pages are meant for that, excepting the pages of Big Billioners MNCs. I hope you are getting my point.

Please let me know the answers of these two questions and also provide me the suggestions on how can i further improve my article. Because, i really want to become a valuable contributor on wiki and its my personal will and not doing it for any profits.

Looking for your kind support :)Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 07:45, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• This is an encyclopaedia not a Yellow Pages for companies, whether they have been operating for 1, 17 or 500 years. Existence is not encyclopaedic notability. I am seeing nothing to indicate that this is more than a firm going about its business. Regarding articles on other firms, feel free to nominate them for deletion if notability is not evident. Incidentally, what does this even mean: "Passionate about innovating and developing solutions with unique ability to think out of the box and intuitively grasp the evolving business needs."? Pure marketing methane. AllyD (talk) 09:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey AllyD, thanks for your feedbask and thanks a lot for notifying me the issues with that line, i have completely removed that. Secondly, i understand its not a Yellow Page platform, ofcourse! and i agree with your next point as well.

Alright, i am not asking you to remove the deletion nomination, rather if possible can you please send it to draft so that i can search for more useful information instead of just making it look like an promotional stuff for the organization.

Thank you!Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 09:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• You are free to reinstate it in Draft - as it was before you moved it back into mainspace with the same problems as in July. If you are going to pursue this, you need to read the WP:COMPANY notability guidelines.And if you have any affiliation with the company it must be disclosed. AllyD (talk) 09:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

July!! That's a long story AllyD. No i don't have any affiliations with this company. I just dont want to let my first article hanged in draft and thats why i scheduled a f2f interview with the CEO which took lot of efforts of mine, and you wont beleive i have a long document of the interview questions, but unfortunately i can't share the complete insights from that too, because it containt lots of promotional lines which i personally dont want to share on an encyclopedia platform, because i understant for what the platform is - Anyways, thanks a ton for your kind help. Could you please tell me from where i can put it in draft, i don't know that Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 10:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

But thanks for sharing WP:COMPANY, i am sure i can consider the things mentioned here.Mikewilsonn1 (talk) 10:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Dear allyD brother. as the shoppingpak organization was launched in 2016 it have less coverage but all the information provided on wikipedia is correct ant true as the citing is mentioned. please recommend. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mechengrasim (talk • contribs) 14:33, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

• A Facebook page, two press releases and a listing are not references. AllyD (talk) 15:12, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

19:07, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

• I was just tried to create a translated page for greek language wikipedia, using the translation page, but it saved in english language one instead... I didn't understand why... The same method worked fine for phosphorane a few days ago... Of course it should deleted from here...

Vchorozopoulos (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please don't delete the subsidiary of Procter & Gamble because it contain the former names of Procter & Gamble Philippines, Inc. ɔyʀɥs ɴotoʒɑt bulɑɡɑ (You want to talk to me?) 10:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

kadang kadang zaman dulu kita bisa membantu orang mahu masuk dengan bahasa - tetapi Indonesia Proyek shrunk in recent years, to the point there are not the editors with time interest or capacity.. thanks for your timely comments, my time in Java is creeping away in years, and my formal expressions dalam bahasa are getting rougher and rougher. So thanks JarrahTree 10:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Emilurex (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for this great catch, would have been difficult even for Indians. Pratyush (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello AllyD. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as mark pages as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Saw your comment on my talk page. Thanks for your points on Managing conflict of Interest. I fully understand and appreciate your points. I would like to request you to kindly help me to resolve the issue and rescue those pages. Looking forward to hearing from you. Spurkait (talk) 07:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, AllyD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	best of luck! Isurugam (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for your comment on my new article that was deleted. Could you please advise how to create an article in a new language? The Darknet market article exists in English, but I need add this article in Ukrainian for my school project. Thanks for your help Anastasia192 (talk)Anastasia192Anastasia192 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Anastasia192: If you follow this link to the Ukrainian language Wikipedia you should be able to create the article there. AllyD (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rachel Rozema, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• ? No point in unreviewing a blank page that has been tagged G7 and is heading for the exit. AllyD (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

G7 was wrong for this kind of page. Please be sure to use the correct criterion so that our statistics are accurate. You have been accorded the New Page Reviewer right which assumes you are familiar with WP:DELETION.. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: my recollection is that the article author had at that point blanked the page so that it had zero content, hence the CSD G7. It was then deleted at 19:40, 22 November 2016 by User:RHaworth "G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND)", i.e. the same rationale. AllyD (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

My apologies. Yes, indeed, a review of the deleted material confirms that the creator blanked the page himself with the edit summary: Made page for joke, joke is done, deleting page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello AllyD,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 814 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

	The Original Barnstar
	best of luck! Isurugam (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

Thank you for your comment on my new article that was deleted. Could you please advise how to create an article in a new language? The Darknet market article exists in English, but I need add this article in Ukrainian for my school project. Thanks for your help Anastasia192 (talk)Anastasia192Anastasia192 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Anastasia192: If you follow this link to the Ukrainian language Wikipedia you should be able to create the article there. AllyD (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Rachel Rozema, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• ? No point in unreviewing a blank page that has been tagged G7 and is heading for the exit. AllyD (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

G7 was wrong for this kind of page. Please be sure to use the correct criterion so that our statistics are accurate. You have been accorded the New Page Reviewer right which assumes you are familiar with WP:DELETION.. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 21:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kudpung: my recollection is that the article author had at that point blanked the page so that it had zero content, hence the CSD G7. It was then deleted at 19:40, 22 November 2016 by User:RHaworth "G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND)", i.e. the same rationale. AllyD (talk) 21:33, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

My apologies. Yes, indeed, a review of the deleted material confirms that the creator blanked the page himself with the edit summary: Made page for joke, joke is done, deleting page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:07, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello AllyD,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 814 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .