|
Peaceray (talk) 00:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~))
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, Yes this is another account my old ones were blocked from editing because all were the socketpuppet of NomanPK44. With NomanPK44 I used to do disruptive editing, especially on Indo-Pak-related pages that is the main reason I was blocked from editing from NomanPK44 account. Yes I know I have abused multiple accounts and I am extremely sorry for that. When I created this account I did decide that I will not do any disruptive edits and will always try to obey the Wiki rules u can also check the editing history of this account most of my edits were productive contribution and doesn't contain vandalism that's why I ask u to please allow me to use this account and unblock me. I have understand the wiki rules and how wiki works vandalism has no place here and I will always try to stop it and also not do it. BenCKP (talk) 13:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You obviously hadn't the slightest intention of following WP:SOCK or WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 13:23, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BenCKP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Yes I didn't follow socket rules and I am sorry for that. But u also have to realize that I don't have any other options I wanted to edit on Wiki that's why I use to create another account and when they get banned I didn't appeal because I thought the appeal won't get approved as I was doing somewhat disruptive editing with the new accounts as well but when I created this account I have decided that I won't be doing any disruptive editing and will be following the rules of the wiki that's why I always tried to not do and disruptive editing with this account. That is the main reason I am appealing to u that please reconsider and allow me to edit as I am not doing what I use to do with my previous accounts and don't keep me ban please. BenCKP (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You do have other options; you can abide by our rules. If you actually intend to follow our rules, you must stop socking no matter how much you want to edit. Your only possible pathway back to editing it to demonstrate your good faith by refraining from editing for at least six months(so no edits before November 25th) and at that time requesting unblock under your original account. If you aren't willing to do that, you are just wasting our time here. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@331dot: Sorry for the ping but I want to ask that why some of my edits that were constructive have been reverted and even the pages that I created have been deleted per WP:BANREVERT. But WP:BANREVERT states that "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a banned editor (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand)". Please look into it. BenCKP (talk) 14:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)