![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Regarding The Avengers film project, this is a particularly unusual article because it is about a film that has not started production yet. Per WP:NFF, we usually start articles about films once they start principal photography because it is a near-guarantee for the film to be completed. This case is unusual because while it does not meet WP:NFF, there is a lot of detail that people think it warrants an article anyway. The best way to look at the project article is that it's an article about recent history, not an article about an unreleased film. If filming does begin, we can revise the article's format to be that of a film -- using the infobox, film-related categories, cast layout, etc. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:21, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Just letting you know that you might want to add captions to the movie logos that you just posted. Thanks.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this edit about the reliability of the cite, I have opened a discussion at the WP:RSN here, thanks.Off2riorob (talk) 17:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
I reverted this file back to the original version. The image you uploaded appears to be of concept art for the film and not a logo nor other promotional material intended by the film makers to be used as identification for the film. Also in the future please upload any image in a new namespace that is clearly not a version or derivative of the original image. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 23:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
There are several policies in place for use of non-free images. Specifically, this page would fall under likely not reflecting minimal-use [1] and specfically having a gallery [2]. I loved the movie and the comics were okay, but this seems like a fairly cut and dry policy violation. Maybe try expanding the article with reviews, pulling one of the internal comic images and adding it to describe something about the story or art. -Sharp962 (talk) 13:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC).
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in The Expendables (2010 film), makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geoff B (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
So that's you told. As for being speechless, what's wrong, can't I take a break from Wikipedia for an hour without upsetting you? Sorry, but I have other things to do. Geoff B (talk) 23:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
I don't know if the article has seen enough changes to warrant semi-protection yet. If it keeps on happening, however, then yes, we should definitely apply for it. Geoff B (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fulcrum (Chuck). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Active Banana (bananaphone 15:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Fulcrum (Chuck). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wikipedia article are NOT allowed as "references". They are user generated content that fail our "no original reseach" policy.
Please revert yourself. Active Banana (bananaphone 15:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
You are uploading a great amount of non-free content which is not needed. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, and the use of non-free content is extremely strictly governed by the non-free content criteria- basically, non-free content is used as an absolute last resort. We do not, for example, need to use four screenshots in Chuck Versus the Leftovers; one is more than enough. I'm going to remove a large number of the images you have uploaded from articles, and I advise you avoid using non-free content until you are more familiar with our policies and guidelines on the subject. J Milburn (talk) 13:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Sure, feel free. J Milburn (talk) 20:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Since you suggested renaming Untitled Spider-Man reboot to something else, you may be interested in this requested move. Erik (talk | contribs) 18:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChuckGobbler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Update: Dr Copley says he has a certified copy of Sharlto's birth certificate which he can fax or post to me. How can we reference this as a source? Are these links adequate?
Maybe just ask people to compare the photo of Sharlto with the photo of his dad. I have rarely seen a father and son who look more alike!ChrisStefan (talk) 13:14, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks so much. I needed a place to put Hydra information and that article wasn't there last week.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:20, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Just FYI, since you asked the question in an edit summary, describing Danny as Detective Sgt. Danny Williams is completely correct. His rank is sergeant, police ranks being more or less aligned with military ranks, as I'm sure you know. In addition, he's a police detective, which allows him to use the title Detective. As a result, the form in most police departments is to combine the two: Detective Sgt. (usually written like that), Detective Lt., etc. (Check The Closer, where they all have rank in the LAPD Detective Bureau.) I've just tweaked the character description and first description of Danny, including fixing his title, and thought a quick message here might avoid confusion. Drmargi (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
No, I'm Chuck Norris:) It's a joke. I'm from Russia The Castbreeder (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
A LOT of care needs to be taken with these sections. Too many of the "continuity" details being used were rather trivial and inconsequential to the article and could be branded as trivia. Others were talking about plot points already detailed in the episode summary. I think this section should be reserved for issues such as Clara's age in Masquerade (3 mos. on Valentine's Day means she would have been born around the time of vs. the Leftovers) or significant mythology details. Details such as Morgan sleeping with Carina in S3 jeopardizing his relationship with Alex in S4 just aren't of major importance and worth being singled out. Ambaryer (talk) 22:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I have reviewed your article and failed it, as it unfortunately is not ready for GA status. Please take a look at my comments, and consider re-nominating it later when my concerns have been addressed. If you have any other questions, please let me know. Thanks, Ruby2010 talk 16:58, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Your edit here was also "inconsistent and unconstructive", seeing as how it broke the wikilink to the character article. Also note that there is some uncertainty as to the correct spelling of Moe's first name (Mowadh or Mowahd) which was the reason behind my edit in the first place, please refer to Talk:List of NCIS: Los Angeles characters#Mowadh or Mowahd?. Thanks. -- Jake Fuersturm (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Future Films Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
I was partly in error (including telling you that you made a mistake). In SNL season articles, bold has denoted WU anchor, but not WU anchor only. I'm not sure why it was worded that way in this article. In any event, my apologies for stating that your edit was an error. Thanks for the communication. Best wishes. Cresix (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, had missed your question and only just saw it. I'm not sure - personally I wouldn't have a problem as it could potentially help the reader by breaking up the information but it would depend on the Television WikiProject's manual of style for episode articles. If it doesn't say one way or the other, it might be worth asking on the project's main talk page. Miyagawa (talk) 21:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi so I see you've been editing Psych:Dual Spires. It's horribly long. I was wondering if you would help me to make it shorter, and take out a couple details. Of course, which details to take out is the question. Ideas would be welcome. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luckyannastar (talk • contribs) 19:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for helping with the Dominic Toretto page! Please note that two other character pages that you have helped out on are in discussion for deletion, and I don't know that I'll be able to help with them (I've neglected my family responsibilities too much already). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brian_O%27Conner http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leticia_Ortiz_%28character%29 Macchess (talk) 18:55, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
As someone who has a great deal of experience on Wikipedia, would you mind looking over and possibly rating a couple new articles I've created? I want to make sure I didn't miss anything, and have a third party read over and fix anything I may have done wrong. The articles can be found at Burn Notice: The Fall of Sam Axe and "Pilot (White Collar)". Thanks! Kevinbrogers (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I've reviewed Chuck Versus the Family Volkoff, which you posted at GAN a little whiles back. I've put the article on hold for the next seven days to allow for responses and fixes. The link to the review is here. --Starstriker7(Talk) 16:27, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
Would you mind filling out brief edit summaries? I watch most of the Chuck articles, and I usually don't bother reviewing your edits, since you do good work, but when 20 new Chuck article edits show up in a single refresh of my Watchlist, it would help to separate things like ref changes (which I wouldn't even bother looking at) from content changes (which I might be interested in just reading, if nothing else). Thanks! --Fru1tbat (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Hi, have you had any luck with finding sources for the Production section? Once it has been expanded and I've checked its prose, I'll pass the article. --Starstriker7(Talk) 23:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Buddy! I had to revert your edit to the article on Richard Castle. The name Rick Castle is a play on RICH Asshole -- Fillion and the producer have talked about it a number of times. There's a source to support it, so in this case, Rich is correct. (BTW, haven't forgotten your request -- I should get to it soon. I want to be sure I have enough time to do it properly!) Drmargi (talk) 20:41, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
From the excerpts of the new POTC novel, Pirates of the Caribbean: The Price of Freedom, by A. C. Crispin. http://www.accrispin.com/The%20Price%20of%20Freedom%20excerpt%2006.pdf ,http://www.accrispin.com/The%20Price%20of%20Freedom%20excerpt%201.pdf --Max Tomos (talk) 08:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Chuck season four poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 June 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wilfred (U.S. TV series), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the upcoming FX television series Wilfred is based on the Australian series of the same name and will star series co-creator Jason Gann in the titular role of Wilfred the dog? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Calmer Waters 06:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, I have a question about the comments you've left in your reversions of the Red John article. You're saying it was confirmed that the man in the season 3 finale really was Red John. Can you identify your source for that? I've looked for Bruno Heller's interviews, and I can't find that confirmation. (I found him saying that Bradley Whitford's character really died, but I can't find him confirming his identity as Red John.)
Note: I've read the Talk page and the Inlandia Press interview cited in the article. I'm going to post something in the Talk page, but I specifically wanted to ask about your claim that it's been confirmed that it was Red John. (Note: You can just reply here. Or on the Red John talk page.) -- Tirmie (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I have reviewed "Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger" and placed the article on hold. Notes for improvements can be found on the articles talk page. Thanks, -- Matthew RD 20:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to List of So Random! sketches: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:19, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
The article Dual Spires you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dual Spires for comments about the article. Well done! GRAPPLE X 20:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
My apologies; I must have forgot about your initial message. Surprisingly, I understood the plot quite well (and actually found it quite interesting). If you're considering a FA nom, I'd recommend combining the first two paragraphs in the production section and using a better picture of Chris Fedak. Also, you might want to combine the music and cultural ref sections (just a personal preference thing). Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 20:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Actually, looking at the broadcast date, I would not recommend bringing the article to FAC until the DVD special features are released. I made that mistake with one of my FACs a while back (Olivia) and decided to denominate it. If you really want to bring a Chuck episode to FA, perhaps nominate another from a previous season (and use the DVDs to expand them). Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 16:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Hey, Boycool42. Don't worry too much over the nomination. After all, it's supposed to be a somewhat fun experience building an article to the FA level, not a reason to get a heart attack. I understand that you're a bit frustrated and I totally know how you feel; being told that your work doesn't meet a standard is beyond irritating. That being said, I think the article's not bad at all, and that it can be improved to the desired level with some hard work and a bit of time. I'd be willing to lend my help if you would like it. ceranthor 02:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello there, just to note that I've taken Malleus Factuorum to ANI for his personal attacks against both you and (when I took it up with him) me as well.
![]() |
The Wisdom of Solomon Award |
For displaying a maturity in admitting to mistakes, that some editors chronologically older than you would do well to emulate. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 06:18, 30 July 2011 (UTC) |
I know you are working on a draft of this article and thought you might be interested in this. With that short film, the the digital comic and the MCUs films, I think the character might be notable enough for a stand-alone article. Though I might suggest adding a character description section based on information published in reliable sources.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
And a grammatical bravo to you, for "that / which" at Marvel Cinematic Universe! I, too, cannot resist making a gentle joke when I see some grammatical or syntactical error that changes a sentence's meaning. It's like the panda with a gun who Eats, Shoots, and Leaves (to quote the book title). Wonderful surgical edit. My kudos. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. I see that you are a contributor to The A-Team (comics). Your input is requested on its talk page in response to it having excessive copyrighted content on it, possibly in violation of WP:NFCC#3. Thank you. Phuzion (talk) 19:24, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Do you know the circumstances of this film passing GA? I had to jump through hoops to pass Scream, I can't see how this article is meant to have passed.
...Apparently passed by someone who joined yesterday? WTF broken system much? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 16:48, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() | On 13 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Phil Coulson, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that S.H.I.E.L.D. agent Phil Coulson, played by Clark Gregg in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, will appear as Peter Parker's school principal in the upcoming cartoon series Ultimate Spider-Man? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Phil Coulson.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from the active members of the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 16:02, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
for quick and clean compromise involving hatnotes on The Cape article. RadioFan (talk) 00:57, 14 August 2011 (UTC) |
The article Chuck Versus the Intersect you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Chuck Versus the Intersect for things which need to be addressed. GRAPPLE X 11:11, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
I just joined, and I gotta say that I'm a HUGE fan of anything by Douglas Adams, in addition to Chuck! The BEST show on TV right now! I'm sad it's the final season soon, but ah well. I haven't had time to keep up with season 4 so I'll have to get the DVD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beachdude42 (talk • contribs) 04:54, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
Since you've been giving me some advice because of your similarities of my situation in the past, would you mind keeping an eye out for me, and fixing problems when re-nominated? I'll fix them, but I'm going to need more than one person to do this for this to reach FA, and I'll promise to help you on your Chuck article. Fanaction2031 (talk) 03:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)