This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi C.Fred, I do not understand why you undid my edit because I researched and found a reliable site that states that the war was inconclusive. TheNewSMG (talk) 16:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
—C.Fred (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Ok, at it then.TheNewSMG (talk) 16:36, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Ok, the website is made by a company and its directors called Compare Infobase Limited and there is a disclaimer on the site, "Disclaimer: All efforts have been made to make this image accurate. However Compare Infobase Limited and its directors do not own any responsibility for the correctness or authenticity of the same." I am pretty sure the site is accurate and is not a junk site posting lies.
TheNewSMG (talk) 16:41, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Encyclopaedia Brittanica has a source that states that the battle was inconclusive. I somehow cannot copy and paste the source and save the edit. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
If you look up indianetzone.com and search Battle of Haldighati, the source will pop up.
TheNewSMG (talk) 17:37, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
This is the second time this article has been created by the same user, and then speedy deleted. Is there something further that can be done to curb this from happening again? Thank you for your time.18abruce (talk) 01:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Will you please redirect ((Disney Channel Original Movies)) to ((Disney Channel pilots, films, and specials))? HOoOH (talk) 04:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
C Fred,
I edited Airtran Flt 867's incident report, as it contained incorrect information. I was also an Airtran Captain, and I have in depth knowledge of the Boeing 737, as well as that specific incident. I also heard a recounting of the incident from the Captain involved, and his reasons for turning off the runway toward the hill. I was based in Atlanta for over a decade, and that runway (26L) has a steep downward slope past the end of the runway. It would have been Russian roulette to gamble on the accumulators stopping the aircraft before the end of the runway. Like all airliners, the Boeing 737 can be steered with the rudder as well as hydraulic accumulators for nosewheel steering, so literally, any pilot would know there was no loss of control.
Skylotus (talk) 15:30, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Understand.
Skylotus (talk) 14:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
There are strong arguments on both side of the issue, when it comes to its authenticity. However, you seem too dismissive of the view that differs from your own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gscmds (talk • contribs) 02:36, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
I notice that you indef semi protected Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority Police due to continuing edit wars, and as you claim, sock puppetry. The war has been continuing at MTA Bridges and Tunnels, the parent organization, in the police section. You may wish to do something about it. By the way, semi protection may not be ideal, as one of the parties appears to have an account (GySgtHartman (talk · contribs)), but after a COI warning he seems to have preferred editing logged out instead, except as necessary to get around the protection. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:02, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Good day. Is there a way to send you a private message about an issue I am having with other editors on the Vanessa O'Brien article? I was threatened on my Talk page by one of the editors when I tried to correct a wrong on this article last week, and didn't want to list the name(s) of those editors publicly on your talk page if I had a way to send you a message privately. Thank you. Salvatore42 (talk) 13:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
it is about my son i am new and having a hard time with this — Preceding unsigned comment added by C Deals (talk • contribs) 02:54, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Canada is objectively located in the northern half of North America. Geometric accuracy is obviously important. The edits I made to the Canada article are objectively constructive. I am the state (talk) 17:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
The material you removed yesterday came back. I removed the worst of it but tried to keep a bit, but it needs to work. No objection if you think it should all go. Meters (talk) 19:34, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Please can you help? How can I edit ritodrine to include the fact that when children reach adolescence they may develop mental health issues? Sorry I'm new to this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 19:39, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
http://www.medschat.com/Discuss/yutopar-aka-ritodrine-241313.htm
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00044-014-1066-1
For example — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 19:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Is a youtube video link allowed that only shows the side effects on the mother when on ritodrine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 20:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
If I can't mention the effects on the child then so be it but the video can support the side effects on the mother that are already mentioned in wikipedia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKiExFioFBA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 20:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
It is my video and it is me. I think it is important to show in video what the side effects can be because reading and seeing are two very different things. You want my medical files to prove it? I can provide if necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 20:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Wow this is really frustrating. Ok one final question. This is a fact fact promise. Can we include that the medication was designed to be used for a short period of time (days). I can find the relevant link again. You see people are being put on this medication for months but it was designed for just days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjingjie (talk • contribs) 21:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I was just wondering why in particular the page "The 5th Records" was taken down, and what process went into you making that decision. Thank you!
John Hopkins23 (talk) 02:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)John Hopkins
It's been over 3 years since you posted in the talk feed so I thought I would shoot you a message since I spotted it. I rev a pic of the University Football practice facility showing the two claimed national titles and a media mentioning the other three not claimed. I created an Unclaimed nat'l titles into the info box to fit with other football wikis. Just wanted you to know since I saw your name on the talk page about this.KillerFrosty (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, thank you for your input. I appreciate it. It's obviously my first attempt at doing this, so naturally I will screw up. But, if you don't mind, allow me to ask you to edit my content. Let me know what I need to make sure the article is well written and well documented. I can forward you some news articles that have been written about our federation (FIFCO) and our role in the federation. Again, thank you for your help.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by CorporateSoccer (talk • contribs) 02:07, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
C.Fred - I did not see this as a self promotion. The CCSL is a national league, with players, teams and other. In my description, I never mentioned how to sign up, nor how to participate. In fact, I stated the facts of what the league does, where it plays its games, the amount of players and our international affiliations. Seeing your comment, did you actually read the article I posted? Is it mostly that my user name is the same as the league that bothers you?
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorporateSoccer (talk • contribs) 02:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Ok, this is clear. I get it now. But with all due respect, corporate league is not in the same category as a sunday rec league, nor any beer league. The corporate teams, of the like of Apple, Ubisoft, PwC etc, all compete at city, national and international levels. We are affiliated to an international organisation that promotes the game, the teams and the championships. There is world cup associated to it. I have never seen a rec league at this level before. The international federation has articles about them, but in foreign languages, does this help?
˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by CorporateSoccer (talk • contribs) 02:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I think one of the IPs that you reverted the edits of on L.A. Love (La La), one of the 24.41.xxx.xxx range, returned with the IP 107.77.215.181. They restored their edits there and on several other pages. Ss112 00:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you could look into these pages: Sir Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet, and Talk:Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet.
Basically, the page Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet redirects to the Sir Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet page, and Talk:Sir Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet redirects to Talk:Henry Seymour, 1st Baronet. This struck me as odd, and I was wondering which name the article should go under. Thank you. Zhangj1079 (T|C) 15:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
hi there, you very helpfully redirected the above page. however john cosgrove is better known as a referee and a teacher than he is for his days playing gaelic football here in mayo. i personally think john cosgrove gaa is a better page title. what do you think? if you agree can you change it back to "John Cosgrove GAA" thanks gerry Rochwick (talk) 20:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thank you. i'm new to wikipedia so i don't really understand that but it sounds great. thank you so much for your help. gRochwick (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Can you revdel the edits from Rylyn123 to this page; they're completely copied from this page. I tagged the talk page for deletion also, as it's identical. Home Lander (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. It's racist and anti-Semitic in one distasteful fell swoop [1]. Many of us are inclined to chafe when someone reverts an edit, but this is something else. Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
C.Fred
I keep trying to re-edit Fred Hampton but I noticed you keep reverting the edits. I really want to make a clarification and further explain. Please I am trying to re-edit for the sake of further giving justice to the legacy of Fred Hampton. In the initial opening paragraph, it says that the Chicago Tribune reported the case as being a result of a "wild gun battle". This is NOT the case, that's why I keep trying to say that the story was falsely fabricated. Secondly, at the end of the paragraph, it begins to suggest that Fred Hampton's death was justified.. And then it says that a civil lawsuit resulted in a resettlement. I'm saying that some people might not know that terminology, and I'm trying to re-edit and say maybe even leave that part out. Why even suggest that it was a justified death, it was not at all. And I'm trying to emphasize that by re-editing a few parts to give the proper elaboration. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayymach15 (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Looks like the creator of Zachary Grixti is still doing that page and has a possible duck account on it now. Wgolf (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
No brother that he works by writing books in the periods not to write books Balkleh and others [3] Khaledsalah (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This is an official page for a journalist, author and author [4] This is his page goodreads [5] This book has been authored On the world famous site goodreads [6] The sources I wrote about [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] Khaledsalah (talk) 22:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
But it is a book written by the name of the top men All the sources here are my dear brother Nader mohamed Khaledsalah (talk) 22:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
My brother Azay is not one author, a journalist, political critic and the director of the largest real estate companies in Egypt attended you. And I attended you with sources in all the Arab and foreign sites [12] And in some sources to his book about the journalist Nader Mohammed
Khaledsalah (talk) 22:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I am a writer, journalist, writer and manager of a large real estate company in Egypt, and all this is mentioned by my brother Proof of that And the proof that I am the author of books [13] The proof is that I am a journalist [14] , [15] [16] Khaledsalah (talk) 22:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
i request to create a new page. RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 12:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Thnks for editing [[[Mahesh 25]] thnks.. RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 16:04, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Please check this to see what I have done right. RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 11:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
I have created a page, check it out Naman Mishra RaashikhannaDHFR (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
A sockpuppet of the creator of recently deleted page "Studio 54' " is going after pages i have created and tagging it with db-author. User is Tundejoshua Zazzysa (talk) 20:08, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred,
I recently reviewed a page ( Victoria Thorpe ) created by a new user about herself and tagged for deletion but user keeps removing deletion template even after being warned. I have reverted twice and will no longer revert until an admin takes action. Thanks in advance. The same thing is applicable to Studio 54' and i suspect same user created new account for the sole purpose of removing speedy delete tag Zazzysa (talk) 19:50, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
oops I'm sorry I hadn't realised I wasn't allowed to :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictoriaThorpeArt (talk • contribs) 20:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fred I did contest but was not given an answer it was just deleted please can you shed some light as to why Anne Stokes has a biography page yet I am not allowed one? How do I write one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictoriaThorpeArt (talk • contribs) 20:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for finally explaining the matter of the autobiography matter for the page Michael Taillard. This page is not an autobiography. We made a wiki account in the memory of this individual, as he has contributed greatly to the field in a very short time span but does not have much longer to contribute as a result of a neurological disorder resulting from medical complications caused by a severe acid burn.
Please, if anything, we ask for your support in editing this article to the degree that it will be deemed acceptable on Wikipedia so that their visionary contributions will be accessible to those outside the field of behavioral economics.
Thank you. We do apologize for the username issue. We were not aware that this was a policy. Is there some way you can assist with that matter? Do you have recommendations? The article was not written or published by Michael, and we don't want our own oversight to become a problem.
Can you please specify the matter of conflict of interest? What is the specific conflict of interest to which you refer? If there is some aspect of the article that presents a conflict of interest, we will change it.
I appreciate your prompt and helpful responses. Would it be asking too much for your personal assessment of what can be improved within the article? I assure you that no advertisement was intended. The guy can't even work since the accident, so what would be the point of advertising? Notability is definitely not an issue, either. During his short period, he wrote several highly influential books, fundamentally changed the paradigm of international capital allocations, taught at graduate schools in the US and China, and spearheaded research into groundbreaking medical research using financial metrics. How much more notability does a person need? In any case, if you would give us a more specific review of what needs to be changed, we would greatly appreciate it. His work was revolutionary but published for other experts. The public deserves to know.
Fair enough, but Michael worked for other professionals to improve their work. He was not very publicly visible, but was very influential in the field. Even if you disagree with that, can we agree that the "advertisement" warning is unwarranted? At the very least, can that be removed?
Sorry about the signatures. Still learning. In any case, I noticed you made a couple minor edits today. Were there any issues you found regarding violations of a "neutral point of view"? There have been a large volume of changes made by Wiki editors and members of the public, so I'm not entirely sure exactly what changes have been made anymore, myself. If you have found something, please let me know so that I can change it. If these changes have resolved any matters, then can the warning be removed? Mtaillard (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I appreciate you taking the time and effort to help "the new guy". As for the COI concern, I do not personally see anything that needs to be changed. However, should you find something, by all means feel free to alter it. I would much rather improve the quality of the page then let it sit with some problem in it, much less risk the entire page being deleted. If you do not see anything that presents a conflict of interest, then I look forward to seeing that warning removed, but the quality of the page is, of course, the highest priority. Mtaillard (talk) 19:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
@C.Fred The matter of the image ownership has been resolved, as Taillard's wife (who took the picture) has acknowledged ownership and approved for its free usage and distribution. In addition, I have found yet more outside citations which improve notability. You can find them on the page's Talk page. I will wait for you to address them and include them to the article, as you recommended. Mtaillard (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@C.Fred It is on the deletion request nomination page for that image in Commons. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Michael_Taillard,_PhD_MBA.jpg Mtaillard (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
@C.Fred That has already been established. I never denied I knew them. I acknowledged before that Taillard is a colleague of the people who put together his article. As the warning says, "It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view." So, the real question is whether or not there is anything in the article that actually violates the "neutral point of view". Since the original creation of the article, several people totally unknown to Michael or myself have made significant changes, and if they improve the quality of the article then that's great. If there is something in the article that needs cleanup, then let's clean it up. If not, then give credit where it is due and remove the warning. Mtaillard (talk) 03:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi there,
I have been trying to include information about Direct Selling Europe's wikipedia page and I have to disagree about your last deletion, based on another user's mentioning of plagiarism. The last information that I wrote on the page is not plagiarism as it only includes some information mentioned in DSE's website (such as statistics in Europe), and always with a different drafting.
How can I solve this?
Many thanks
Care to take a look at his latest creations Special:Contributions/Jeremy9901? The block does not seem to have helped. Meters (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. I am attempting to correct misinformation about my late husband Tobe Hooper. That's all I want to do. His name is Willard and everyone keeps changing it to William He has one son, William Tony Hooper and the press and media keep saying William Hooper and Tony Hooper are 2 people. There is a William Hooper, sound editor that Google keeps saying is a relation, but he is not a relation. And he is also working with me trying to get Google to disassociate his name from the Tobe Hooper clan and All American Massacre.
That's why I keep correcting it. It's not because I am partial or one-sided. It's because I want his legacy to be accurate. If you need me to fax in marriage certificates, death certificates, let me know where.
Thank you Rmbart (talk) 15:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
I have opened a SPI into the users who have kept recreating the page, something smells funny here. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harrisonjames48 331dot (talk) 22:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear Fred, i created a page for user itslider i picked that username but we are a product no user. How can i make a page describing a invention that has to be coined here. We have worked 12 month in secrecy on this i have to document the time stamp of today. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Sir it is not about promoting a product. It is a patented tool and we are coining the term MicroSport. It doesnt exist on wikipedia. I have to coin the term Micro Sport in the first place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
I am not blatently promoting a product i even updated the page. I like to describe the sport i invented. I am an inventor not a marketer. Can i get any support form wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
So if i coin a new sport it is not something i can write into wikipedia. How did everything then get into wikipedia? I can find everything in the world in here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Then please link me to something that is called it. slider or Micro Sports. You are telling the untruth above saying that it exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Fine, I will follow up in two weeks after launch. I am very upset by your analysis. Thank you Goodbye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itslider (talk • contribs) 00:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
it was my first day on wikipedia and i already don't like it. do what you need to we are a legit company it. LLC and a news source itstudios.com the rest you will learn from media. I dont think i will ever return to wikipedia. Good day — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1012:B021:C7EB:5DD:820:F965:8A89 (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for deleting Shawn I Faqua there is also Shawn faqua.Theroadislong (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Just letting you know the you don't really need to warn Coastermaniac, as I have already reported them as a VOA. Tornado chaser (talk) 02:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Can you please give me -time- to finish my own edits before you make yours? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LuciBLSRA (talk • contribs) 00:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Ugh... still getting used to this.. That was from me, about the time. I'm dyslexic and need to go slow. LuciBLSRA (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Fred, I'm having trouble formatting the Biblio. I'm attempting to make it look similar to the Bibliography on Fannie and Freddie Mac on Wiki but also keep some of the formatting of the original article on SSRN so it's easy to read. Are there any quick guides to formatting? I thought I understood it, but I keep getting weird stuff. LuciBLSRA (talk) 00:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
C. Fred,
I am new to Wikipedia and am not aware that I was using any copyrighted material. Perhaps you can tell me what was copyrighted, because I am unaware of it. You said I was blocked on my talk page and I notice that when I try to even ask for an unblock on my talk page I just get the notice that I'm blocked.
When I try to put in an "unblock" request, it says I'm not blocked. JPGordon says I have never been blocked. Since I'm new to Wikipedia I don't know what to do. I have learned that I must go to the William M. Branham talk page before I can get anything changed.
Please give me a reason why you blocked me and I'll try to conform. Also, I don't know how to request this block be removed. Will you please help me?Danpeanuts (talk) 13:09, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Danpeanuts (talk) 06:07, 11 September 2017
((unblock))
template yourself for whatever reason. The procedural decline reason is that you are indeed never blocked. Also this is the block log for your account, as you can see it's blank, which means you have never been blocked here. As a result, you can still edit articles, as long as in a constructive way and follow the rules. Good luck. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. 🖉← 13:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)See edit history. Article hijacked several years ago and no one noticed. This other entity is not notable and doesn't have any reliable references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goalpostsback (talk • contribs) 21:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I'm Politsi, Minaj certification sales already quite enough for her to join the list with 85m-claim https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_music_artists please see the list. Thanks Politsi (talk) 01:10, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Jennifer Koranteng, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
— InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 13:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.
The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.
To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.
We really appreciate your input!
Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.
For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
I wanna recreate the jace norman and isabella morners page pls reply quicckly Egbodo huddy (talk) 23:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
The guy who made Sufi Rock Band I believe is a promotional account, have already reverted a couple of his edits, don't feel like going through every one though! Wgolf (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
I believe User:Account new title may be a sock of WP:LTA/SGK. Note other similar account names at User talk:Ks0stm#Troll_accounts. Either way, I think it's WP:NOTHERE. Home Lander (talk) 03:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Have you read this Discussion page about my explanation of the "Provinceness" of Jakarta rather than a city? - NouVa (talk) 17:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Before delete the page you should let me know the actual reason. Other are saying that no any content like promotion in page. Then why are you deleted? If you feel happy to delete the page, then i can provide you many pages they have links broken and like advertisement. Please provide strongest reson and word you saw like promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chir49 (talk • contribs)
I don't know why some like advertise and some are telling that there is not any content like advertisement. There are many page that are not to be on wikipedia but still exist. And i had also linked references with the article but i think you are dumb
Azay Akhi is a famous person, author, journalist and some sourcesKhaledsalah (talk) 21:06, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
I want to retrieve the article brother Please I am tired where one of the people who are based on Wikimedia Commons edit my page will be supported with the EncyclopediaKhaledsalah (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Please try to retrieve the page and what errors are correctedKhaledsalah (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
There are sources that put his official image inside the articlesKhaledsalah (talk) 21:27, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Words in the sense: Some of the sources you talked about are reliable sources mentioned in the pages alshuhranewsalfnalyoummasrawyelwatannewscopts-unitedakhbarakKhaledsalah (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2017 (UTC) I mean the person is Nader Mohammed and not someone elseKhaledsalah (talk) 21:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Your presence says that some sites invite someone else how someone else they talk about someone famous author such as Nader Mohammed and some sites put his image by the article and some reliable news sources talking to him at the headquarters of the newspaper and put a picture of their news to be the real person and not someone elseKhaledsalah (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fred! Very new to this wikipedia editing, kind of confusing.
Can you help me rename the article to Saudin so the url becomes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudin - and rename/move that article to the url https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudin_(chemical) ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamSaudin (talk • contribs) 17:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
How about the album covers of his last two project releases? Or links to his iTunes/Spotify artist profiles? His twitter/instagram/facebook page names? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamSaudin (talk • contribs) 17:12, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
In a recent podcast interview with TheComeUpShow, at 5:51 minutes in Saudin states that he is dropping the A.J. to be known only as Saudin. Link here https://www.thecomeupshow.com/2017/08/30/saudin-comes-easy-wont-last-lasts-wont-come-easy/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamSaudin (talk • contribs) 17:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Excerpt from the podcast beginning at 5:51
Host: So, Saudin? AJ Saudin? What is it? What’s the Saudin, AJ Saudin? Seems like - Saudin: So it’s just Saudin. Host: Saudin. Saudin: Yeah it’s just like you know just drop the AJ it’s just straight Saudin. Host: And that’s the family name? Saudin: That’s my last name and I’m actually like the last boy Saudin, so I’m trying to carry on the legacy as much as I possibly can. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamSaudin (talk • contribs) 17:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
That's alright for now I suppose. Thank you. Testing signage, hope this works TeamSaudin (talk) 18:03, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. An IP you blocked two weeks ago for block evasion, 24.41.228.188, is now back and restoring their edits to the pages they were reverted on. Ss112 01:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
There was absolutely no reason to delete because rule G3 has nothing to do with this. I was just simply making my table of Big Brother with my own cast and evictions but thanks to you all my hard work is gone. This took me 3 hours to complete so it would be kind of you to return my information and so I can continue what my time was spent on. Jayden275722023 (talk) 02:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
Bit of a noob but have been asked to rectify errors on the page with regard to incorrect logo...and minor changes to the party structure Ukvandppmerch (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
C. Fred -- I'm about as close as a primary source as you are going to get. I'd really like to see my LONG TIME ex-husbands name off my wikipedia page. Do I need to send you a divorce decree? A wedding certificate? My driver's license? Please tell me what I need to do so I can take control of my own biography. Thank you. ZippityDooDah (talk) 20:58, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello C. Fred,
Thank you for your response to my edit; and for your guidance on this. Info removed was no longer contemporary in nature, and I did employ the reason for edit box/section. I'm very sorry if this was not seen or otherwise picked up! This is the paragraph in question:
In 2008, a profile in The Palm Beach Post on Newsmax and founder Ruddy indicated the company generated revenues of approximately $25 million per year, and, according to the company, has been profitable for the past five years. In a 2009 Forbes.com interview, Internet expert Nathan Richardson was asked to identify the "smartest thing on the web" today. Richardson identified Newsmax, among several websites, citing its success "monetizing the web."[8]
Thank you.
Dulcamara1 (talk) 04:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Dulcamara1
Oh dear. Not sure this guy can take a hint. Home Lander (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
My, what a stress-filled job you Wikipedestrians must have. Being made to fret and feverishly convene like stammering schoolgirls when the subject of one of your profiles takes exception to being called 'pretentious" and "self promoting" by one of your unimaginative tribe. Sorry to have rattled your composure, ladies, but y'see I hail from a time long ago when a site like yours would actually graciously welcome the input and insights of a featured subject. As your corporate nightmare machine fueled by litigation fears and bean-counting lackeys lumbers soullessly forward, you've left something very valuable in your dust. The human element. Simple consideration and gratitude for the efforts of someone who's trying to add some quality to your uninspired and vacuous standard presentation. You're now sitting there ringing your hands like the world is ending because I called you on viciously hacking the brief and informative bio I supplied down to a splinter and then complaining in your tag box that it still needs extensive work when there's NOTHING LEFT TO WORK ON. Pardon me if I find your screeching and flailing a tad excessive over a bio that consists of THREE STODGY SENTENCES. I'm officially asking you here and now to leave the current page alone, as criminally spartan as it is, and quit marring the appearance with ugly tag boxes with meaningless alarm text, or else just remove the whole page, which is utterly fine with me. From what I've seen of your ridiculous behaviors and attitudes, I don't want to be associated with your silly enterprise. Frankly, I don't know how I wound up on sticky Wiki in the first place. I certainly never solicited or campaigned for inclusion ... and I have good reason to suspect that there's more than a smidgen of "agenda" going on with all the incessant harassment I've faced since my first post but, alas, that's the current trend ... the conditions that prevail, as they say. At any rate. Kindly use your noodles to find a way to leave the bio page alone or pull it once and for all. It's that simple. From the heart of my bottom, Nick Bougas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megerflit (talk • contribs) 22:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
RE: Zetron
Hello, The edit does not contain incorrect information. While the article does not mention Spillman, the story for Abilene FD) references issues with a new Spillman system that was used to replace an aging Zetron system. The story states that the issue is with Spillman, the story states that Spillman is being sued. The link gives the impression that Zetron is the issue when that is incorrect.RollsKanardly (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC) RollsKanardly (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2017 (UTC)RollsKanardly Sep. 21, 2017
The reference was changed back and I understand why it was. The title also does not mention Zetron. Makes the reference a little misleading. RollsKanardly (talk) 23:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
I am not trying to violate Michael Bair page I am just trying to create my page which is Michael Hernandez. Michael Bair and Michael Hernandez are two diferent person and as you see Michael Bair is redirecting My name Michael Hernandez to his page and that is not fair, because his name is Michael Bair not Michael Hernandez I am the real Michael Hernandez and he is Michael Bair please help me to create my page.
Fred C.
We exchanged some communications a few months ago about an update that I performed to the Dallas, TX page concerning the employment data. We resolved that very easily once I explained the text update was being made based on the links always reflecting the latest data and new links did not need to be made. You can go to the page and see where we discussed that.
I have invested a great deal of time over the last few days updating that same section of the Dallas, TX page that you and I discussed back several months ago. Today, out of the clear blue, someone takes exception to it and arbitrarily deletes a huge section of data. I reverted it back and he then did the same thing and so forth. I am now at 3 reverts and cannot change it. He has now enlisted the help of one of his buddies to have yet another person delete all of that data that I have labored so hard to gather, document, update and provide appropriate citations and so forth to the text.
Will you please help me? Can you please put it back to what I had and lock that part of the page from any further arbitrary deletes while this is being resolved?
Please, I spent a great deal of time to make the data current, correct and to annotate everything correctly to now see someone who doesn't apparently like the fact that Dallas has eclipsed Houston in several categories make arbitrary deletes and get someone else to back it up by doing it again (knowing that if I do I may be banned because it would be my 3 revert).
Please help me! Texan44 (talk) 21:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC) September 23, 2017
Fred, the data is not new, it was not being expanded, it was merely being updated. The whole paragraph is prefaced by the fact that Dallas is the central economy in the region and the data that follows is only available as an MSA form of data. If the update has upset someone because of the data, then just put it back to the old version and let it be. This is crazy that merely updating existing text with current released data is creating this. I do not know how to start a discussion on the Talk:Dallas board or I would do so. I think what this is telling me is there are very petty people who cannot tolerate data that is not what they want it to be.Texan44 (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
The reason they gave to me that they didn't like it was that I "expanded" the data ... I didn't expand it was updated. And I have updated this section off and on for a very long time and never had anyone object, until now. And I believe it is a safe assumption that it was the actual content of this latest update that is the basis for this this time. As mentioned, I have been updating this section of the article for a very, very long time with population, GDP, etc. and until today it has not bother a single party. So today, a single party takes exception to it and now "poof" it all gone. This is not encouraging people such as myself who have taken the time to research and document and provide very valuable input to this forum to have it arbitrarily deleted by a single party that takes exception to the data being "expanded" when that was not the case at all.Texan44 (talk) 21:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
He sent that to my talk page .... can you see it on my page? Yes, he says those other things too but when I responded directly to him about this his response to me was because I "expanded" the text. All I am asking you is if you will please restore the text and lock it for now, let me open a conversation on the Talk:Dallas page and get input, if there is consensus it should go then it will go and I will never waste my time on Wikipedia again with this topic. But with it being deleted and gone it makes it difficult for people to see what it is that is being discussed. If you will please, as a temporary measure, restore it, lock it and then let it be discussed over a period of time then it would seem more fair to someone who has invested, not just today but for a very long time adding updates to this very page. Can you do that and let me then see about how to start a new conversation on the Talk:Dallas page about this? I said I wasn't sure how to because I went over to that page and looked and didnt' see an easy way to start something (like it seemed with reaching out to you).Texan44 (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Then it is on his talk page ... because that was what was stated ... that because I "expanded" it it caused him to take notice and object to it. Anyway, since the page has contained this data for a very, very long time it would seem that the correct and fair thing to do is to restore it to the previous existing state, allow a discussion to be opened in the Talk:Dallas page, let input and feedback occur, and after that has occurred than action can be taken one way or the other. This approach right now is very one-sided ... if the party has an issue with it then why didn't they take it to the Talk:Dallas page in the first place than starting the editing war? The other party started the edit war and did not take the time or courtesy to post his issues in an appropriate setting for discussion before his taking arbitrary action that has led to this dispute. Wouldn't that have been the more civilized approach? Create a discussion in the appropriate forum about the matter FIRST before removing text that has been in place for a very, very long time and creating this level of dispute?
So I am asking you to do much as an unbiased arbiter would do, restore it to what it was, allow a discussion to be opened in an appropriate forum (Talk:Dallas) and monitor that for whatever is an acceptable period of time, then action be taken one way or the other that would be a consensus. Right now, the action taken is not one of consensus but completely arbitrary which seem to run counter to everything you are saying you support.Texan44 (talk) 22:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
If you will please restore the text, lock it for the timeframe that it is under discussion, so it can be visible to those who will participate in the discussion, and then final action be taken one way or the other. As stated, this is arbitrary right now and is not what a court of law would do in a similar circumstance. Longstanding text that has been there for ages should not be stripped away at the whim of one person ... I will be happy to start a discussion if the text can be restored, locked, and left in place for the duration of the discussion and then action taken that is fair and equitable to all parties involved, not just one which is what it is now.
If Wikipedia is about fairness then that is the correct way to go ...Texan44 (talk) 22:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Lepricavark told me that no admin is answering my request probably because it is long. The problem is that it has been 11 months now that these attacks continue, and when there are attempts to stop them, there are even more attacks so that it is too long for admins to read everything (specially since the attacks are often marred into artificial content disputes so that it appears even more complicated). The problem is that I do not feel safe editing since, without a ban of the user, I am to continue to be subject to these long-going aggressive and very hurtful attacks and threats. --Launebee (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I have one you can use. If you tell me how to send it to you I will provide it. It is free. It is my photo and you are welcome to use it and it has the approval of the artist. Please tell me how to send it to you.
Yes please C. Fred if that is what is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ELOJeff10538 (talk • contribs)
Sorry I don't know what this means. Please use any free picture other than the one being re-inserted. Something like this one perhaps. Or can you advise how I can send you one? http://www.newsandstar.co.uk/lifestyle/features/article/Rumer-Learning-to-dodge-the-fame-and-concentrate-on-singing-0b4409ec-05d8-48ad-b78c-e5fa4666400b-ds
The image you keep using is one that is not liked and is not the best free image as you state. Please consider using another, or advise me on how I can send you a free one to use. Thanks.
If you can tell me how to send you a picture I can guarantee that it is free as I took it, I own it and it has the approval of the artist. You may have it for free for this page. Can I email it to you as I can see no way of adding it here. Thanks so much
This makes no sense. If its not free its not allowed and if it is free is shouldnt be added here. Why can it just not replace the picture you have here. You are talking in riddles and I have no idea what wikipedia commons is, how does it get from there to here after that?
Please use this picture that I have now uploaded to Wiki commons, it is mine and would be preferred. Thanks. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rumer_my_own_personal_photograph.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by ELOJeff10538 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Please use this picture. As an expert could you load it for me so that I am doing the right thing. Thanks. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 16:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC) 7a (2)nnn my own personal photograph taken by me of Rumer
It isn't on Rumer's official Facebook page at this time, it was over two years ago and she has changed the profile pictures on the page since. Altho I suppose it is archived somewhere. I have no way of knowing how to find an archived Facebook picture (if such a thing exists). To be honest I am less concerned about my own picture going up, and more concerned that photograph that has been put back up is back up again. Is there a way you can remove that one in the meantime. Thanks for your help C.Fred this is all new to me and seems incredibly over complex. All I was trying to do was help with a simple request to remove the current photo and replace it with "anything". ELOJeff10538 (talk) 18:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Ok what I meant by "anything" was that "anything" would be better than the current photo. Of course replacing it with my photo once it has been approved would be great. But what I meant was that it really didn't have to be one of mine. Unless of course using such makes things simpler and quicker to change. Anyway, in the mean time can the Birmingham Symphony Hall photo loaded by EggHead06 be removed - no photo is better than that one. Thanks again. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
So you would rather over-ride the personal wishes of the person in the picture. Thats really a terrible shame. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
The picture you insist on keeping has not been "used with permission" of the person in it, why do you not need to prove that? Thats quite ironic all things considered. I shouldn't have to copy my personal email from the person in the picture asking me to help remove it surely? It seems that your word that an unwanted photograph is acceptable, but my word that I have been asked to help remove it is insufficient. This is not consistent or fair. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:29, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Really what is the difference to you in these photographs. why does the one there have so much sway. I only have your word that it should be the photo that must be used. That is not sufficient. Surely? ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Who is contesting it?? Why? It is my photograph. I have now asked for wiki commons to accept my ownership of it. I do not accept the wishes of the person contesting it as I know I own it. On what basis of established fact are they contesting it? I only have your or their word that they think it is contestable and that is not acceptable. Hopefully once wiki commons approve the fact that I have said it does not require a licence I will be able to load it. Or someone else can load something in place of the current picture. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Anyway, as you said earlier above, hopefully we can soon move forward. Ultimately I am sure we are on the same side here, it is just hugely frustrating from the perspective of someone simply trying to help with what ought to be a pretty straightforward process. I do appreciate your assistance here in view all of the difficulties thus far encountered... Kind regards and hopefully soon we can get this fixed. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 19:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
I don't have a COI, I have consideration and respect for the person in that picture and their wishes. Sadly the intentional barriers you mention and their resulting pedantry here seems to over ride actual people's human feelings and emotions. Of course technically you are right on all counts but if these things are more important, then this seems very very sad and tbh quite shameful. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes that's right. To repeat, there is no Conflict of Interest here just simple courtesy and respect and consideration for others. I do not subscribe to your view that this is a COI. Rules may be rules to you, of course, but you are arbitrarily assigning your assertion to me - as a result of suchlike - on some totally random (and more importantly inaccurate) whim here (if you don't accept things "on a whim" then neither do I). So to make absolutely clear I do not accept this as I am not prepared to take such a random view at face value. Sorry about that. I have said before this about common courtesy etc etc, so we'll just have to try and move forward if a different photograph is approved for use on the page in time. Thanks again. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
You can make of them whatever you like. If you are calling me a liar then fine. Unfair and you're wrong, but its your prerogative I suppose. However, that is personally really not at all important to me. I have no need to prove myself to you in this regard, I was just hoping to swap over a picture. I've made clear why. It really is up to you whether you believe "my claims" or not. I really don't care if you don't believe them, I would just like the photograph changed over as I have said many times before. That's all that matters to me here at the end of the day. If you choose to believe that I have made that up it really doesn't bother me in comparison to the actual request. Just another sad shameful part of the process I guess. Ho hum. Lets hope my photo gets approved by the licensing folks as a first step anyway. If my attempts fail, then it is my understanding that this issue will be progressed more formally by other parties more professionally placed and much better at the whole thing than me ... ELOJeff10538 (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Dear FlightTime, there should be no copyright issues regarding a request for the removal of a photograph. Thanks anyway. ELOJeff10538 (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, C.Fred. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "TSFactory".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
I am reverting the VANDALISM that references a personal attack opinion piece referering to her as a "Kardashian look a like, and slandering her".
I have also sited the WP:RS where Video references are Allowed.
The people undoing this version have a political aganda against her, and are trying to slander her. Wikipedian FW (talk) 00:50, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Then why didn't you just remove the google doc? What you have reverted to, just leaves personal attack opinion pieces. This is unacciptible. Wikipedian FW (talk) 01:01, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Why my article was deleted by @C.Fred Solecito91 (talk) 22:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Can someone help to recreate my article is very important for my culture .Thanks Solecito91 (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
I am Mr. Sosa’s attorney and his biographical info as to his ethnicity is incorrect. Please remove that his father was of Haitian origin. He was Dominican DominicanResponse (talk) 01:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
I am not being compensated for my edits. I am a personal friend and Sammy Sosa’s lawyer and the info that I removed is at Mr. Sosa’s insistence because the info is false. DominicanResponse (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Then what do I need to do to correct the info? This is the first topic I edit ever on Wikipedia. The info on his father is false. I don’t know what else I can do because it should be removed. I am not being paid to edit this. I am his attorney but, this is not in my billable time. I am simply editing the content to correct incorrect info DominicanResponse (talk) 01:58, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I will make sure that I have a published reliable source to counter the article that assumes that Mr. Sosa’s father was of Haitian origin. The article cited doesn’t even confirm the allegations and conclusions reached. However, I will make sure that I get a reliable source and cite it to counter the misstatements made by whoever edited it and included the false info. Thank you. I am not doing this to get publicity, incite a war of words or anything of the like, I simply want to correct the article so that the info is correct. DominicanResponse (talk) 02:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
I am overly shocked by your shocking disparaging comments about the god we know to be Alessandro Esposito. You said that my edits had an unacceptable amount of overly glowing prose about Alessandro Esposito. On the contrary, sir, I don't think they were glowing enough. That man is a god, and all of my information came directly from him. So why don't you leave me to do my business and you do yours. God dammit, Fred. I'm trying to make him famous. Ojax364 (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)ojax364
On the series we knew, There's problems with the names on this, Is WP:OR, The names needed research for the English airings of Big Sky, Small Fry!
1. Ash needs to revert back to Satoshi,
2. Lana needs too revert back to Suiren
3. Kiawe needs to revert back to Kaki
4. Team Rocket needs to go back to R-Dan
5. These English names on the dub needs WP:OR, Find the research for the names.
6. And the plot needs new blurb for that
Plans needed, The, C. UnknownPro (talk) 00:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/803110974 was the problem, See Oripaypaykim's revision. UnknownPro (talk) 00:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
"With no class today", Ash and Lana go Pokémon-fishing, but they may end up catching more than they bargained for since the lagoon they're fishing in may contain a water-type Totem Pokémon. If there is, then Lana is determined to battle it. Meanwhile, Kiawe takes the rest of the gang to visit his family's dairy farm, and Team Rocket doesn't seem to be having much luck with their own Pokémon-fishing is not the blurb UnknownPro (talk) 00:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
As will of the airdate:
EP#[a] | English title Japanese title |
Air date | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
J# | E# | ! United States | |||
975 | 968 | "Big Sky, Small Fry!" (The Mighty Yowashi, Totem of the Lake!) Transliteration: "Yowashi tsuyoshi, ike no nushi!" (Japanese: ヨワシ強し、池のぬし!) | July 6, 2017 | September 30, 2017 | |
With no class today, Ash and Lana spots an Wishiwashi that could turn into School Form, What if works? |
UnknownPro (talk) 04:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Why? I am the only one posting the correct information. Please read the links that I have sourced!
OK Fred. I think I have posted enough sources on the talk page to back up my claims that Jethro Tull has not reformed. So who will now provide the consensus in order to get the erroneous information removed?
OK, thanks. I have added signature. Can I delete something that I posted on the talk pages? --Hooter13 (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
So it seems that FlightTime has ruled that the Jethro Tull page will remain as is, largely because Escape Orbit provided the most current reference, which was dated March 16, 2017. I then provided an article dated Aug. 12, 2017 which clearly states that Ian Anderson "now goes by his name rather than that of the group" and "He formally ended Jethro Tull a few years ago, figuring it was probably time that it was his name on the marquee." Please have a look at this article. It is clear indication that Ian Anderson now tours under his own name.
I admit that I am also a newbie to Wikipedia. What I would like to know though is whether FlightTime or Escape Orbit have a higher status than me. If not, what makes them correct and me wrong?--Hooter13 (talk) 03:15, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
You redirected it to a page that doesn't exist, and it cant be reverted.-K-popguardian (talk) 20:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
oh, ok. Thank you for the help. Sry i got mad.-K-popguardian (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred. You blocked this IP for 31 hours back in September for block evasion (probably related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Euexperttime/Archive). Anyway, the IP seems to be back editing European School articles. I reverted the IP edits and asked them to discuss on the articles' talk pages instead because the IP's preferred version has been previously reverted by others multiple times and is also the same version which other IPs were trying to add. If this was an inappropriate thing to do, please revert me. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Why my talk: Umair Ahmad page Deleted by You ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.187.56.255 (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
hi... Now Ömrüm - Günüm, Sevdi Ürək the pages will be deleted? I swear to God this is true. these old albums. the songs not be offered officially for sale in our country. do not allow pirat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayla.Mirzezadeh (talk • contribs) 19:39, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
External links is a community page not advertisement. The Facebook page was up over 10 years. There is also a website about the community. Why isn't it allowed?? Lakelandbmore (talk) 23:48, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Please review your closure regarding Đakovica Municipality 3RR violation by User:PlyrStar93 [18], you acted based on a lie. Assuming you want to act based on facts not lies. 78.55.121.189 (talk) 19:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I am totally aganist this sppedy deletion. Prakash Neupane (NepHop) is a popular renounced artist verified on Facebook, shahzam, Spotify, genius, musixmatch and having well google records. Even he had international good records which you can see in huffingtonpost: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/59d5a96be4b085c51090ada8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iampython (talk • contribs) 19:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Is the potential issue solved or do I need to make further edits? I undid my last reversion. —DanielFreed (talk) 20:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice! —DanielFreed (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
IT appears the source coming directly from "a controversial museum" of that last Vengaboys Edit confirming their 20th Anniversary is up to date and correct, just check robin pors and Denise posts Instagram page for additional proof...
more proof [1]
Your Right, definitely not reliable, Something Weird is going on with "That" Museum... Just checked it again and was redirected to this and greeted by this ominous page claiming several parts of their Museum are under attack by some hater and some weird sounding siren blared in the background constantly!
[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.8.226 (talk) 03:44, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
References
@C.Fred: Sorry about removing your CSD tag on this page. I added a few tags then was going to add ((mergeto)) St. Michael-Albertville High School. When the edit came back and I saw the CSD tag, the only thing I could think was "crap." LOL! Thanks for the hard work. Operator873CONNECT 02:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello C. Fred. I'm continuing this from a separate page.
The information is valid (regarding the STMA Theater Program) for a wiki article, already looking at the WP:ORG article this particular subject has multiple news sources reporting on it(^ Gutzwiller, Meghan. “Pirates of Penzance Takes the Stage at STMA High School Starting Thursday.” North Wright County Today, 7 Nov. 2016, northwrightcounty.today/2016/11/pirates-penzance-takes-stage-stma-high-school-starting-thursday/.) , talked about in a published book by a St. Michael Historian (2.^ Jump up to: a b Zahler, Bob. Faith, Family & Farming: a History of St. Michael, Minnesota. Robert H. Zahler, 2009.). I will continuing looking at the page to further prove my point by implore you to reconsider you judgment without having examined all the facts thoroughly
Clubs are generally deleted as not notable unless they are syndicated or coordinated on a national/international level. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Schools). 1.) The STMA High School Theater Program is not a club, but a program and 2.) It is apart of the International Thespians Society which, as it says in the title, an INTERNATIONAL organization. The Program also welcomes many foreign exchange students, which also adds to its claim of "coordination with a national/international level"OlderWomen (talk) 03:01, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
(https://sites.google.com/a/mystma.org/mr-mann-s-class/musical/international-thespian-society) This site here is run by the director of the Program and talks about International Thespian Society at the High School and Membership.
Also I read you wiki article and noticed the part about your "deletion": In the course of wielding the administrator's mop, I also delete a fair number of articles. Most are about the editor's band, girlfriend, school club, story idea, or MMORPG guild. Some articles have a shred of hope to them, so I leave them around to see if there is future development on them. While I keep them on my watchlist, I've also got a list of articles to revisit to see if progress has been made on them. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:C.Fred)
So yes, I can see you would want to delete this page and I respect your opinion, but my article and its subject DO meet the standards of the article you recommended me (WP:ORG) and yes, it does have, as you phrase it, "a shred of hope". I'll be adding more information shortly so please give me the opportunity to at least continue editing it until I can submit it, I promise that the information that will be stated in it will be more than satisfactory. OlderWomen (talk) 03:43, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Also, just saw this, are you considering merging it with the St. Michael Albertville High School page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Michael-Albertville_High_School). I just noticed that conversation you were having with someone, sorry to throw that on there as well.OlderWomen (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Dear C Fred i am the person whose Vikipedia this is and there are some very bad things in it about me , which are absolutely false please do ask a proof from someone when they make a change about a public person and allow me to make required changes so that you can have accurate information about me and also please let me know who made these recent changes when it was said that i am a sex worker, i am an a global prize winning girls education activist sister Zeph, and this is someone who is making such stories about me, I am feeling so bad right now by looking at such words about me and my character
That Vengaboys Museum appears to be Persistent... Keep a eye on the official Vengaboys wiki or Protect it and force Vengaboys Themselves to provide their ID if they want to add any new Edits to their Wiki...
First a weird page came up saying the Museum was under attack, now it has returned to normal... They must be planning something big because this recently popped up on google if you do a search for Vengaboys Museum and you check out their official facebook page and you see a ominous message about their museum creating some kind of "global domination"...
Image and Ominous Message — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.130.80.182 (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
I thought she was a fictional identical twin for real. Pretty Little Liars (book series). --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 14:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for throwing that indef block on the sock account that just popped up :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Page updated! Karen at Stuart Weitzman (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
Bad overlook on my part at James Burgoyne, thanks for cleaning it up. Home Lander (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
we request that you join the MM we stop Islamaphobic bias and encourage knowledge about Islam including on wikipedia.
Why would you delete this page?it is confirmed by the references
There are links to imdb and kinlock, this is the most authoritative websites about the movie.
Kinopoisk (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KinoPoisk) is the most reliable website about movies in Russia.And sorry for my English.
Edit the staff of Yandex.(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yandex)
The website people are doing,Kotor follow the movie news,actors.All editors of the site understand the movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
So you can recover the page?The actor is quite famous in the country and there are links to reliable sources.
This actor-Belarus.In my country it is quite well known.A bunch of Belarusian actors and poets there are in Wikipedia,but in your country it is not known.—Onix14489952
I can throw links to Russian-language sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
http://www.bolshoyvopros.ru/questions/1630244-serial-molodezhka-ivan-dubrovskij-foto-biografija-filmografija.html http://oserialy.ru/aktery_i_biografija/biografija/ivan_dubrovskij/28-1-0-43 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
I threw 2 more source than you do not like them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs)
I will create a page for the last time.Will add a lot of sources.Do not like-delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onix14489952 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, please help out to take down all discussions of S.Styron. Mostly are indexed on Google. Thats not allowed. User is Global Banned. So do not index the past things. There is no need. Please check all sites and delete everything. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NEW-02 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to let you know I appreciate you finding the last good (maybe?) state for Brannock High School. When I get a chance, I'll dig through and work on the article to see if I can't verify all the info. Operator873CONNECT 22:15, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred,
The user Cheikh Didier keeps on editing this page over the past two days, removing the correct link to the director Mike Mitchell and replacing it with the disambiguation page, which I don't like because it leads readers to the wrong page. The user has repeated the performance four times, twice before and after page protection. There should be appropriate action to take against the user who did that. Thanks, Iggy (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Hey I want to improve upon the Mountain View High School Wikipedia page, as it is certainly very lacking. I'm trying to put in information about many organizations, but I'm not sure what counts as encyclopedic and what doesn't since the only comment you ususally leave behind after deleting my edits is that my information isn't encyclopedic. Please help!
Infoismymiddlename (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
I was merely following the name that's used on the Swedish Wikipedia. It has been 'bout four years since I last studied Swedish, so I am not sure if there is something fishy about the matter, I'll admit. --Prospero One (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
When the matter stated in the article is not backed by one or two citations but by more than a dozen citations, how can possibly term the info as biased, exaggerated or vague? Kindly look into this. Labeling a page, backed by solid references, with maintenance tags is extremely wrong! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
What about the other two maintenance tags?? You are a registered user, how about you look into this?? Having these tags is something extremely disrespectful to the contributions made that have been backed by sources mentioned. Thanks would appreciate if you can do something! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 22:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
Okay thankyou! Rashid Ghafoor (talk) 23:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
What is your role in editing first hand accounts by an individual to a Wikipedia page to obscure factual first hand account of criminal behavior ? Spookmagook (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes I am a primary source who met with him was asaulted by him and threatened with false arrest, planting evidence and prison if I disclosed. He was the Asst State Attorney General and. He was serious Spookmagook (talk) 18:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Fred yes I am saying that as a primary source having been attacked, and with him demanding sex . When I was able to leave he threatened me as the Washington State Attorney general with false arrest and imprisonment if I disclosed the event Spookmagook (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Fred this whole page is jury rigged by criminal suppression of source material . When you apply these standards against the manipulation of the story your point allows for continuation of myth building for the story of a very disturbing predation. Oddly very little of this story in Wikipedia is a reflection of the truth.
The victims in this case were intimidated, had too much to loose as with the Lakeside boys or disenfranchised as with the street kids this judge raped.
Congrats, rules without methodology in this case are malleable forms of propaganda as is demonstrated in this situation. Spookmagook (talk) 00:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Fred; I am Patricia Anne Fletcher. My brother Edward Michael Fletcher and I wish to improve upon the page about Patrick Oswald F. Fletcher. We do not see this as an issue of conflict just that it needs fleshing out. I have left a message on the Talk on the current page however I see the page was put up by WikiProject Saskatchewan and they are shown as semi-active which means I may never get a reply. I am quite willing to show you what we would like to place on the page. I don't think there should be a problem with the material, it just is more complete. Please let me know how to proceed. Thank you Pat Sportate (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportate (talk • contribs) 00:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred
Thank you for the feedback regarding my article. I´m new at this so do you mind giving me some advice on how to finish it, please? whats missing etc? Your feedback would be very helpful for me.
Regards Marlode (talk) 08:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kalingaaa is a WP:DUCK sock of User:Nsmutte. Please delete this disruptive AFD. Sro23 (talk) 05:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
There isn't really a difference between blocked or banned, as they mean the same thing. AllyGebies (talk) 03:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Can you explain how my edits broke the Neutrality Rule any more than the original article, and its treatment of "ableism" as some proven scientific term, which it certainly isn't? Bucky225 (talk) 01:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear C.Fred,
I am sorry to know that you never identify the links provided in Kartikeya are not related to Murugan- the god of Tamils. First you should not redirect the Murugan page to Karthikeya.
Karthikeya is god worshiped in North India and not related to Tamil god Murugan. Murugan or Murukan is purely tamil god and dont mix up the Dravidian culture to Aryan culture of north. Aryan culture looted our god and say it in different names. But pure Tamil god is only with six names. Provided in the following page. [19]
1. So i request to to delete the re-directing link from Murugan to karthikeya. If you want to write about Karthikeya its well and good. Dont direct the Dravidian god Murugan to that page of god Karthikeya. Read more about Murugan god of Tamils in the above link provided.
My suggestion is to write about Tamil god murugan there should be a page and it is totally different worshiping by Tamils when compared to Karthikeya worship in North India.
2. First the link provided in the "Karthikeya" page is absolute non-sense. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muruga_(film)" It is a regular Tamil cinema with only having the name Muruga. and it is no way related to Murugan god.
3.Second the the link provided in the karthikeya page is second non-sense thing "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karthikeya_(film)" It is a regular Telugu cinema with only have the name Karthikeya
4. The Picture of Murugan god shown as Karthikeya is third non-sense thing shown in that page. It is God Murugan and not karthikeya. Refer the below page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batu_Caves. The picture to removed from karthikeya page or to be renamed as Lord Murugan.
So i request you not to insult the beliefs of Tamils and Tamil god Murugan with title Karthikeya which belongs to only North Indians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayavan.murugan.sadasivam (talk • contribs) 15:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Dear C.Fred, You can even notice in the Karthikeya page the following in the first paragraph. Quote" Kartikeya is particularly popular and predominantly worshipped in South India as Murugan, among the Tamil people.[4][2][5] Unquote"
Also Murukan is the worshiped as lord Murukan by the ancient tamils and not the new god Karthikeya. this would justify to have the the original god "Murukan" rather than "Karthikeya" from which other names have emerged. For more understanding read the following books, http://murugan.org/research/clothey.faces.of.murukan.htm "The Many Faces of Murukan: The History and Meaning of a South Indian God " By Fred W. Clothey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayavan.murugan.sadasivam (talk • contribs) 05:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Projet Montreal 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
There really has been some heavy-handed editing and deletions regarding band name THE RUB.
A temporary band that played a few gigs has been favored in the wikipedia review process over the first band to use the name that was formed in Los Angeles in 1985 and that has been active through to its current release in November 2017. THE RUB is on the notable independent Happy Squid Records (Pasadena, CA) label which has its own wikipedia page. This label represents an important LA underground list of artists. There is a gentlemen named Reni associated with the temporary gig band he named the rub whose ego knows no bounds. You really should review all his postings, which are self-generated and self aggrandizing. For example, did you know Reni is the greatest drummer in rock history - according to Reni. This wikipedia lets stand at the expense of a very humble and descriptive posting THE RUB (US). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.115.79 (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
See [20]. I see you went to UNC. A lot of my family went to Duke. Doug Weller talk 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my edit. I’m just correcting the wording. The reference is already there. They just left out the word Reserve. IShoot556 (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Fred, Vbnmj is a sock of Nsmutte. Please block the account, see the SPI if needed. Thanks. Home Lander (talk) 02:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Think a sock is active at Northwell Health where you just were at - apparently they have an issue with the COI tag. Home Lander (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Please check the reference of the latest Vengaboys interview involving "a fan asking Vengaboys about the Illuminati" on the official vengaboys wiki before you go undoing it just because the source came directly from Vengaboys themselves in a interview through a Ellington Video. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellingtonisland (talk • contribs) 03:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Please Check latest Uncle John Music Video Filming location in Vengaboys Article to see if it meets Wikipedia's Officious Reference Policies — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.13.125 (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
I requested 3 edits. You refused them based on a single reference to a blog, what about the other changes? The reference to the blog itself s a minor point, the reference itself was to a blog that was already cited by the article you might note if you took the time. My text that referred to the blog states its existence, which is verifiable, rather than the veracity of its content, either way, that part need not be included. All other edits cite academic sources. Whats your excuse for not including those? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Socialpsychfollower (talk • contribs) 18:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Socialpsychfollower 19:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
References
As a young social psychologist, she played by the rules and won big: an influential study, a viral TED talk, a prestigious job at Harvard. Then, suddenly, the rules changed.
Cesario2017
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).When the next editor has a go at me, as they sometimes do, for being a little previous with my CSD tagging, I will be able to say that sometimes, just sometimes, C.Fred beats me to the draw ! Velella Velella Talk 19:39, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
I am responded in reference to the Artist's Proof Page. The explanation were vague and some were incorrect. If you read my edit, I describe in detail all proofs and how each is a part of the printmaking process. I have been in the field for over 40 yrs and wanted to fix it for younger generations who may be interested. Ideally there would a "Printmaking Proofs" page with all the proof types underneath with a link to their own page i.e. Artists Proof, Printers Proof, Trail Proof, Bon a Tirer, etc. How can I go about doing this. I spent a good deal of time writing my edit so I'm curious what steps need to be taken so that it is approved. I am new to this so help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.
Best
Arthistoryandfacts (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC) (Arthistoryandfacts (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC))
Hi C.Fred
I am responded in reference to the Artist's Proof Page. The explanation were vague and some were incorrect. If you read my edit, I describe in detail all proofs and how each is a part of the printmaking process. I have been in the field for over 40 yrs and wanted to fix it for younger generations who may be interested. Ideally there would a "Printmaking Proofs" page with all the proof types underneath with a link to their own page i.e. Artists Proof, Printers Proof, Trail Proof, Bon a Tirer, etc. How can I go about doing this. I spent a good deal of time writing my edit so I'm curious what steps need to be taken so that it is approved. I am new to this so help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time.
Best
Arthistoryandfacts (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Fred, can I recommend that Vicky Kadïañ be salted? This article has been created and deleted under three names (the other two being Vìçky Kádïáñ, Vicky kadian, and Vicky kadian (vhacker)), and its creator is under investiagtion as a sock puppet per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vhacker Vicky kadian. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Operator873's Outstanding Wikipedian Award | ||
For conspicuous and meritorious service under unusual and/or exceptional circumstances, I am proud to present this award to C.Fred in honor of their accomplishments which reflect great credit upon themselves and their fellow Wikipedians. You were observed directly acting to oppose vandalism, restore content, fight sockpuppetry, and protect content in a blindingly fast manner. There was at least two times you were able to respond to evolving incidents faster than I could. While you may carry a mop and are "expected" to invest a certain amount of dependability and dedication, your actions are clearly above and beyond the normal "call of duty." Especially when one considers today is Thanksgiving and a recognized US Holiday. Thank you, for all you do here. Operator873CONNECT 23:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, I'm not seeing anything that explains the block. It looks like he was creating pages for users? If you are going to block him for disruption, shouldn't there be something about the block on this talk page so he knows A) what he was blocked for and B) how to move forward? Given he has disclosed who he is (or at least who he claims to be), this is either him or someone trying to attack him in some weird way. Either way I'd think we'd want this dealt with a bit more by-the-book. Hobit (talk) 16:07, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Boleyn. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Khadim Hussain Rizvi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Boleyn (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi C.Fred, I noticed you have recently undone some edits done by Nkckyjamelcangri787 (history). This is now the second time the user has created copy-paste moves of the same two Star Wars movies, introducing new, apparently made up, permutations of the movie titles and then edited articles of actors taking part in the movies to bind them to his new version of the same article. He is new, so I am a bit on the fence if this is just an inexperienced new user or something more. Some of the edits are ok, but many are on the border to vandalism, including a couple of PAs against me when I undid his changes the first time around diff, diff. He has been cautioned a few times, but as he always purges his talk page after a warning, I'm not sure other editors have noticed this. I was wondering if we are actually already in level 4 territory ([21]). Just on the basis of this, I thought maybe ANI would be warranted. In addition, there is evidence of sockpuppetry (or at least the building up of a second, clean user). Those two look remarkably similar: userpage1, userpage2 with similar edit patterns, though the second user has been inactive for a few weeks. I was wondering if you have any thoughts on this? pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 08:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I think you are right about the COI. Thank you for clearing it up for me. I think I should have read deeper into using good Wikipedia before creating a page.
There are articles (printed press) and an exhibition of Philips work scheduled for next year so I guess we may think about a Wikipedia entry again then (by someone who know what they are doing!)
Regards, Ainsley Ainsley Brown (talk) 16:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello C.Fred, just to let you know I've started an RfC on this BLP. Regards, JGHowes talk 04:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I did. I don't need to site alt text for an image from which the fact is instantly verifiable.
the image is a pyramid chart, as described, any and all of them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kulprit001 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, C.Fred. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Sir, I want to delete my account from Wikipedia permanently and my posted pages too. How can I do that ? Please guide me Aliscience.in (talk) 17:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm apologies, I am new to Wikipedia as far as editing goes. I was sent an alert about my account being suspected of being an impersonation account and I would just like to know the process for confirming who I am. I was attempting to prevent myself from being doxxed on my own wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BenpaiDP (talk • contribs) 01:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Having read A7, English Independence IS an English Nationalist political party in England, and its leader is Neil Humphrey, as per its registration with the Electoral Commission. It contested Batley & Spen By-Election 2016, and will be contesting Alyn & Deeside AM (Welsh Assembly) in Feb 2018. It polled 1.2% which is the same level as UKIP. It beat Ankrit Love, whose Wiki page exists, despite only getting 34 votes (not 241). There is strong evidence of MI5 / Media manipulation in Batley', as English Independence gets almost no coverage at all. All candidates were described as 'far-right', even though 2 were from pakistan and bangladesh. References to the EI candidate are being deleted - notably the Yorkshire Post Oct 2016. Wiki's process to set-up political parties is extremely complex, as including templates, regions etc. A7 says 'Before nominating a page for speedy deletion, consider whether it could be improved, reduced to a stub, merged or redirected elsewhere, reverted to a better previous revision, or handled in some other way'. Please use these sources to create a party stub, or send the material back to me, so I may continue creating my page, which I was part way through. ----EnglishIndy — Preceding unsigned comment added by EnglishIndy (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Can you please hide the revision at [22] because it is full of gross and insulting content. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)