Archive |
Hello, Ceha. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Howabout we take a break from our discussions for a month, for the holidays? So, we suspend the current issues for some time. Your choice. Let me know. (LAz17 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)).
Ceha, can you please remove or re-word your latest comments here. As I'm sure you have seen, I have topic-banned LAz, which means he will no longer be able to respond on that page (or elsewhere, for that matter). If you wish to respond to his last posts nevertheless, please do so without saying things that sound like attacking him in return – not only is it bad style in any case, it's also "hitting someone while they are down", which comes across as rather unfair. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Its like I told LAz, nobody can tell you how detailed your map has to be. When its accurate and sourced, I could not remove it even if I wanted to. Of course, if there is a better, more detailed map, the community most often goes with it - especially if it resolves ethnic disputes raging about the map's lack of detail. :)
If you could make a really nice, detailed map of the 1910 census data, that would be excellent. Its like it always is with these map problems: detail solves all disputes. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 11:30, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, my friend, i am soooo busy now, i will respond tomorrow. OK? :) --Tadijaspeaks 16:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
You have answer here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Serbo_croatian_languages2006.png Please continue discussion there since this map is in Wikimedia Commons and therefore issues related to it should be discussed in Wikimedia Commons. PANONIAN 21:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Izbori 1990.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bosniak croat war.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Serb ambitions.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Ceha, I'm contacting you because we need some Croatian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Croatian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Territories of Croatian community of Herzeg Bosnia.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:04, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Please stop nominating files for deletion, the files are on Wikimedia Commons, and not Wikipedia. They cannot be deleted here. If you still think they should be deleted, you must have the conversation there. --kelapstick(bainuu) 18:34, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Bih-fronts93.JPG, which you've attributed to http://www.slobodanpraljak.com/slobodan_praljak_pocetna.html. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as ((non-free fair use)) or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 08:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burgenland Croatian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Una. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Ceha. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Pozdrav Ceha, svaka čast na poslu s popisom stanovništva po naseljima za županije, kapa dolje. Jedno pitanje: možeš li, molim te, postaviti kartu na kojoj su ucrtane samo granice entiteta, općina i područje koje pokriva EPHZHB? Bilo bi dobro za članak Croat entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina, članak o samoj EPHZHB, a i općenito. Vidio sam da imaš to jer si koristio granice u prikazu kretanja broja Hrvata po općinama 1991-2013. Hvala unaprijed, --Bojovnik (talk) 19:17, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ceha. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:Banovina H.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 14:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Banovine 1929.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 14:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Banovine 1931.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 14:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Bih 1941.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 16:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:S 1961.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 16:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Total-1961.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 16:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Bih 1941.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Ceha. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Banovina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Turkish Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Habsburg Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Please undo your recent edit at Talk:Turkish Croatia. It is normal to link to discussions, not copy them. Combining discussions should require editor consensus, especially if nobody else thinks this is a good idea. If you want to write a brief summary of whatever was concluded at the other page, you could do so. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--౪ Santa ౪99° 22:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--౪ Santa ౪99° 04:16, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --౪ Santa ౪99° 01:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ౪ Santa ౪99° 15:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:50, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kingdom of Bosnia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ključ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Hrvatska Pavla Šubića.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like ((PD-self))
(to release all rights), ((self|cc-by-sa-4.0))
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Kingdom of Bosnia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv🍁 15:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. – bradv🍁 16:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Ceha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not wiolate 3RR on any of the pages. Unfortunatelly, I did not see that brad warned me also on the Bosnia (early medieval polity), I thought that the warning was just for Kingdom and Banate. Čeha (razgovor) 16:50, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You don't have to violate 3RR to be determined to be edit warring. 3RR is a bright line, but you can be determined to have edit warred with fewer reverts, or if there are reverts over a longer period of time than 24 hours. Please read policy on edit warring for more information; to be unblocked, you will need to indicate that you understand this. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ceha (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I understand that. I'm not trying to go into EW. I'm trying to discuss changes, any of my change is very well discussied. I'm also tring to compromise or discuss. I just didn't think that my actions have crossed the line... I'm sorry if they did. Čeha (razgovor) 17:16, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
To answer your question, I see no evidence after Bradv's warning that the other person kept the edit war going. Your comments in the section below indicate that you don't understand what is considered edit warring. Take this 24 hours, read up on edit warring and return to the discussion ready to find consensus (which does seem to be your goal). Barkeep49 (talk) 22:40, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
@Bradv: If I am block for edit war, why am I the only one? Why isn't Santasa blocked also? I'm trying to discuss my changes, using TP etc, trying to be constructive... Why am I the one being blocked? Why are always his versions (if both should be equal) the one which stays as current?--Čeha (razgovor) 21:57, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Last Santasa edit also made an error of adding data from the next time period (banate, not entity). I warned about that, no one reacted.
Hello Ceha. Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2009#Macedonia:
Ceha (talk · contribs) blocked 2 weeks for a slow-moving edit war on Demographic history of Bosnia and Herzegovina. User subject to 1 revert per week on Balkan-related articles indefinitely as this is not the editor's first EW block on the topic. Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
There is no notation elsewhere in WP:DSLOG, so I believe you are still under the indefinite 1RR/week restriction on all Balkan-related articles that was imposed in 2009. This was under the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions. The logging administrator was User:Toddst1. If you believe the restriction is no longer needed, it can be appealed in the usual way. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
With your edit at Bosnia (early medieval polity) here you are breaking your 1RR/week restriction. I hope it was a mistake and strongly advice you to self revert. --T*U (talk) 20:49, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
Mhare (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)::Ceha (talk · contribs) blocked 2 weeks for a slow-moving edit war on Demographic history of Bosnia and Herzegovina. User subject to 1 revert per week on Balkan-related articles indefinitely as this is not the ::editor's first EW block on the topic. Toddst1 (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Ceha. Your name has been mentioned at Talk:Bosnia (early medieval polity) regarding possible canvassing on the Croatian Wikipedia. You may wish to reply there. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donji Kraji, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ključ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Bih 1941.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bosnia (early medieval polity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Croatia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok. Čeha (razgovor) 06:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Ceha. I noticed you placed a response about new RfC options inside the already closed discussion. This is less than optimal for two reasons: First, closed RfC's are supposed to be left as-is to provide a record for future editing or dispute resolution. Second, most editors don't look inside closed RfC's for new comments. I suggest that you create a new section on the page and move your comments to that section. I like to refrain from moving other editor's talk page postings so I won't move them myself unless you ask. I hope this helps explain things. Thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
I have blocked you from editing Kingdom of Bosnia for 3 months. The one-revert-per-week sanction applied to you is a restriction, not an entitlement. Making the same edit every week for months on end, with complete disregard for the discussion on the talk page, still constitutes edit warring.
You are still able to propose changes you want to make to the article on the talk page, provided you are willing to work toward consensus. If these issues persist on the talk page or on other articles in this topic area, the next step will be to ban you from all content regarding the Balkans and Eastern Europe. – bradv🍁 06:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are indefinitely banned from edits relating to Eastern Europe, including the Balkans, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned in response to continuous slow motion edit-warring and repeated changing of content without attempt to obtain consensus for your edits. You were previously warned for this behaviour and blocked from editing Kingdom of Bosnia – this topic ban now extends to all content related to Eastern Europe, including talk pages.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. – bradv🍁 04:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)