This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
All IP edits which update ((disamb)) or ((disambig)) to ((Disambiguation)) generate false positives. Can this be fixed? 82.132.245.233 (talk) 00:19, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
For example, this edit made three changes: ((Wiktionarypar)) -> ((Wiktionary)), ((TOCright)) -> ((TOC right)), ((disambig)) -> ((Disambiguation)) - ClueBot then reverted this edit and the preceeding two edits. 82.132.236.222 (talk) 11:05, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
When Cluebot places a warning on somebody's talk page, can it recognize the presence of previous warnings on that talk page? I ask because of this case: User talk:69.4.57.137. There was already a section heading for January 2014, with a level 2 warning, but when the user made another vandalism edit, Cluebot created a new January 2014 section heading and gave a level 1 warning. I ask because there needs to be an escalating series of warnings if a case is to be made for a block. Thanks for any comment. --MelanieN (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
I do not understand why ClueBot reverted my last comment at Baroque Music article: my comment was a hidden question & a suggestion very politely addressed & signed, concerning the source of the word *baroque* spelled *barocque* in a 1734 text:
"Is the quote "c'est du *barocque* found in the 2001 New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians? If so, then the page number is needed (Blue Indigo)"
I do not see how my using the correct orthography, then the following day adding a hidden comment after being reverted can be considered acts of vandalism!
Also, please note that I did not revert the correction brought by Jerome Kohl, but only added that hidden comment.
Should you take the time to look at the various changes/corrections etc. I have brought to articles for the little time I have been on Wikipedia (English & French), I do not think you will find much vandalism or even many mistakes.
--Blue Indigo (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I get some PHP error messages: "Notice: Undefined index: recaptcha_challenge_field in /data/project/cluebot/public_html/pages/View.page.php on line 22 Notice: Undefined index: recaptcha_response_field in /data/project/cluebot/public_html/pages/View.page.php on line 22".
Before you auto-flag others for vandalism, why don't you make sure your program works? Thanks. Srezz (talk) 12:12, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
On the main page, it says Cluebot is grounded for maintenance, but on other parts (like the new section for talk page) it says Cluebot is running. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmelc9 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 27 January 2014 (UTC) Creepypasta fools — Preceding unsigned comment added by BEASTY73 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Stay out of my articles ..do you read me . Jerk reporting your but stay out and away — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenlgfc (talk • contribs) 04:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
I added the sentence "This text should be removed from this wikipedia article" and you removed it in like, no joke, under a minute. How did you do that so fast? You are really good at your job!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by DudeIncognito (talk • contribs) 08:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
In regard to your edit The following is the log entry regarding this message: Govinda (actor) was changed by Raj007bond007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88361 on 2014-02-09T09:50:07+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2014 (UTC)--
My edit is from a reliable source. Please check references which i have added.--Raj007bond007 (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
There is a problem with Talk:Toronto Star. The archive box has stuff from Talk:Toronto. Can anyone fix this please? I tried everything without screwing it up. Thank you. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 02:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
As of this writing CBNG has not edited in about an hour. I suspect an outage. K6ka (talk | contribs) 03:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
I rejected an edit due to it's irrelevance and Cluebot NG detected it as vandalism [[1]]. I think That it reverted it to vandalism... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titusfox (talk • contribs) 19:20, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
EPIC FAIL on my part, vandalism was reverted to my version. Damn! TitusFox 19:23, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I noticed that your bot reverted a change on a page where the person put a very inappropriate word, So I just want to thank you to the Cluebot for reverting those changes. - Danke! (that's German for "Thank you" :) ) Happy Attack Dog (talk) 23:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but my edit's aren't vandalism, all I've done is just add a little <!-- Stop! sign, can you please tell me how that is vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlisaJay (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
I sendz u happinez, enjoyz!
Happy Attack Dog (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
In the Cats (musical) article, 174.102.111.166 made an edit (22:16, 7 February 2014), then 76.95.108.103 posted "Cats are so cool but dogs are better" (14:43, 13 February 2014) and then ClueBot NG reverted (14:43, 13 February 2014) to version by 174.102.111.166 to remove "Cats are so cool but dogs are better". The version by 174.102.111.166 does not include "Cats are so cool but dogs are better", yet the phrase "Cats are so cool but dogs are better" still is in the article lead (as of this post). Also, when you look at the Clubot removal diff, it says it removed "Cats are so cool but dogs are better", the diff edit shows "Cats are so cool but dogs are better" being removed, but the article text below the diff show the phrase still in the article text. -- Jreferee (talk) 13:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Your bot is clever enough to handle the batch of stupid anons dumb enough to go around blanking pages and inserting "Wales is dumb poop licker LOLOLOL", but how what can it do? 184.44.3.48 (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
false
81.157.48.25 (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Not done - no request - Arjayay (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2014 (UTC)